Posted on 03/22/2017 3:39:37 PM PDT by qam1
OH PUKE!!!!!!!!!!!!! Chuck isn’t for anyone but himself and everyone knows that...oh well New York Peeing Post what do you expect???
Did you even read anything other than the headline?
Yeah, I’m not like a lot of people and just read the headlines, I like to know what it is that is being talked about...guess us older women (72) are kinda like that...what about you???
Ryancare is caving in to Schumer, who is not even at the table. It’s as if Paul Ryan is living in abject fear of the man for no reason.
About a month ago I got sick of hearing UpChuck rave about how great Obamacare was so twice I emailed his office and asked if it is so great why did Congress exempt themselves, their families and I think their aides from it. His response is shoe in the two sets of parentheses below:
( )
and
( )
Well, that is a curious chain of events, that Chuck Schumer would be put in the role of being the “rope-a-dope” foil for Donald Trump. I know The Donald can be pretty subtle at times, but his treatment of Chuck Schumer has been anything BUT subtle.
Does Chuck know and acknowledge his role in this Kabuki Theater being played out?
O M G
Life imitates art!
I remember this one — there is something put in the water to cause all the inhabitants to hallucinate.
The few that don’t share the hallucination are hunted down and killed.
Part A is clearly underway!
Someone spit on the chrome on your Harley today? You are quit feisty this afternoon.
Only the RINO part.
Bwhahahaha! Maybe if this legislation passed in North Korea, it would be conservative.
Yes, and nothing in the article suggests that Chuckie is helping intentionally, or that he’s not just out for himself. Therefore your comment makes little sense if you read the article. It does make sense if you only read the headline.
When then since your the Professor then why don’t you charge people for reading before you open your mouth...
I have no idea what that even means.
Nanzi Pelagosi will save the remnants of zerOcare tomorrow when the Freedom Caucus wants something more. Trump can claim bipartisanship. UpChuckie will do the same thing in the Senate.
It seems remarkable to me that so many so-called “conservatives” would choose to vote WITH Nancy Pelosi and vote AGAINST President Trump.
We expect the hive-mind Democrats to do whatever Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden command.
But it’s hard to see why those so-called “conservatives” are willing to be self-exposed as “useful idiots”.
To them: Bye-bye in 2018!
It seems remarkable to me that so many so-called “conservatives” would choose to vote WITH Nancy Pelosi and vote AGAINST President Trump.
We expect the hive-mind Democrats to do whatever Chuck Schumer, Nancy Pelosi and Joe Biden command.
But it’s hard to see why those so-called “conservatives” are willing to be self-exposed as “useful idiots”.
To them: Bye-bye in 2018!
Good article.
It’s from the New York Post.
But down at the bottom of the article it says, “Special to The Washington Post.” ???
No one ever said Chuck isn’t a Schmuck.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.