It wasn’t Comey asking the questions, yet Gowdy failed (as he always does) to ask the two men in front of him under oath if they were the onese who disclosed General Flynn’s identity and/or the content of the surveillance he was caught on.
What the hell is wrong with that guy? All talk, nothing else. Just like Issa and the rest. Talk is cheap. In fact, talk is worthless.
What the hell is wrong with that guy? All talk, nothing else. Just like Issa and the rest. Talk is cheap. In fact, talk is worthless.
.
http://www.smh.com.au/it-pro/security-it/australian-outback-station-at-forefront-of-us-spying-arsenal-20130720-hv10h.html
Gowdy is a careful interrogator facing an equally savvy suspect. Likely asking if either Rogers or Comey disclosed classified intel would elicit a truthful “no”. Then, down the memory hole.
As it is, we know 10-30 individuals between the two agencies had access. Narrows the field by quite a lot.
The young female R critter (forget her name)began to establish another timeline, one of mandatory disclosure to superiors. Caught Comey saying there was no DNI at the time, when there was. Oops.
Cat and mouse. It’s how this sort of thing is done. No one is in their first rodeo except maybe the young woman I mentioned and I don’t know if she has a criminal law history.
That missed opportunity was small potatoes compared to the dozens of other questions they did not ask. We still don’t know Herbert they bugged Trump Tower. All we know is that Obama did not order it if they did. We don’t know if Obama ordered other wiretaps. We don’t know if Obama changed the distribution rule after being told that they had Flynn on a wiretap. We don’t know if Comey is investigating a Trump bank account. We don’t know if someone at the FBI tipped off Hillary that they were investigating a Trump bank account. It goes on and on.