Posted on 03/17/2017 5:14:39 PM PDT by unlearner
Why exactly is this woman not in jail?
I don't often accuse fellow Freepers...but you are an idiot and an embarrassment to FR.
You run around accusing Freepers of all sorts of things you deem inappropriate.
Well, take your big mouth and eff off.
With all due respect, adopting a “Christian” pose of unconditional forgiveness towards an unrepentant felon is the idiot position.
Being so ridiculously willing to forgive that all principles of justice get thrown out the window is borderline enablement, and I’m not quite sure which side of the border it falls on.
You're a wishy washy squish, with no spine, little intellect, and as far as being an idiot and an embarrassment to FR goes, you take those honors and in spades.
I don't "accuse" other posters of things that are "inappropriate"; however, I do call out those who post inane, naive, stupid, and/or patently ridiculous twaddle. Suck it up snowflake!
Is that like a vegan that likes the occasional BLT?
I guess by your name you can think. Her comment included an apology.
Was it sincere?
I wouldn't know.
But she did apologize.
Your posts are puerile and show an abject lack of education, the ability to think, and a VERY unChristian attitude; whilst you fraudulently claim to be a Christian.
Just imagine if Sarah Palin was given interview questions prior to her interview in which she was totally stumped by one of the questions asked...
How underhanded are the Dem cheaters?
Sounds like a perfectly reasonable reason for President Trump to ban CNN from all white house press events.
They broke the rules and any sense of decorum and actively assisted his opponent, knowing that the result would be to his detriment. Then they lied about it. CNN didn’t fire Brazile, nor issue a formal apology to President Trump and their viewers and the American people. They have forfeit their claim to the “journalism” moniker and need to be punished for it by having all credentials pulled for Trump’s entire first term. if they can be honest in the next presidential election cycle they can earn back the privilege of access to the administration.
Eff off.
If I am an idiot on FR, I ask you to produce evidence of such idiocy.
I post articles every day. You have plenty of material to chose from.
Go for it.
Prove your point or shut the eff up.
In her case, I don't think that word means what you think it means. Think James Cone.
Big whoop...so you post articles on FR, do you? That is supposed to be "impressive"? *snicker*
Talk about being a "nobody....that's you; diddums. ;^)
I'm not the only one, on this thread, alone, who found your post about the CRIMINAL Brazile, to be not just inane, but stupid. Wake up and race the fact that your post, that started this all, was and shall always be stupid.
I guess the well-educated nopardons has pored over her thesaurus.
Keep it up. I like it.
The dems are blaming everyone and everything except for themselves and their enfeebled, corrupt candidate for losing. One can’t help but suspect quite a few voters voted against hillary because of those pilfered debate questions.
This is a top Clinton consigliere we’re talking about.
I find it difficult to understand why someone would give such a person the benefit of the doubt, as if nothing at all was learned over the last 25 years about how Clintonites operate.
It’s not even remotely reasonable to give leeway to hardened big time criminals - and very likely actual traitors, as we should eventually learn from the Clinton email crimes.
But I love that you pulled that banal canard out of your arse to use. LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.