To: Jim Robinson
No, but they always fall back on the Commerce Clause as their reason for everything......
2 posted on
03/17/2017 12:41:57 PM PDT by
Red Badger
(Ending a sentence with a preposition is nothing to be afraid of........)
To: Red Badger; Jim Robinson
Totally unconstitutional. And health care is not interstate commerce (although it would be constitutional to strike down state laws barring buying insurance out-of-state - and that probably ought to be done).
10 posted on
03/17/2017 12:45:49 PM PDT by
NobleFree
("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
To: Red Badger; Jim Robinson
>>No, but they always fall back on the Commerce Clause as their reason for everything......<<
Worse — the entire Constitution is embedded in the Preamble: “To Promote the General Welfare.”
That is the whole thing as far as they are concerned.
30 posted on
03/17/2017 12:52:26 PM PDT by
freedumb2003
(Not tired of winning yet!)
To: Red Badger
Sad a law is more important to the actual constitution. The judicial needs to restict as only of three government powers.
53 posted on
03/17/2017 1:28:52 PM PDT by
keving
(We are the Government)
To: Red Badger
Constitution?
That old rag? That was written in the dark ages, was it mot? What did they know back then?/s
100 posted on
03/19/2017 7:17:07 AM PDT by
HangThemHigh
(Entropy's not what it used to be.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson