Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mark Levin: There is something horribly immoral about RINOcare
Conservative Review ^ | March 09, 2017 | By: Chris Pandolfo

Posted on 03/09/2017 10:35:57 PM PST by TBP

Thursday on the radio, Conservative Review Editor-in-Chief Mark Levin gave the rundown on the press conference of Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wisc. (F, 51%), in which Ryan tried to give the hard sell to Americans on the Republican American Health Care Act "reform" plan.

Levin called Ryan’s proposal “repeal in name only." Or, if you will, “RINOcare,” because the GOP plan keeps the core of Obamacare in place.

Levin had a “number of questions” for the speaker, questions that so far remain unanswered.

“Now, here’s my question Mr. Ryan,” Levin said. “How much will the average American’s deduction go up, or down?”

Further, Levin asked, how much will the federal government be spending on subsidies for certain individuals? Will individuals be able to see the doctors they want? The specialists they need? Will individuals be able to go to the hospital of their choice? Will they be able to get the medicines they need to get?

At the end of the day, the problem with RINOcare, Levin explained, is it embraces the Left’s assumption that government involvement is needed to make health insurance affordable. It embraces progressivism; it embraces centralization.

“Republicans have blown it,” Levin said. "There is something horribly immoral about RINOcare."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 198ml; cuckcare; healthcare; levin; marklevin; obamacare; obamacare20; paulryan; piasa; repealit; rinocare; ryan; talkradio; tbp; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last
To: MichaelCorleone

I’m with you!


161 posted on 03/12/2017 1:23:03 AM PST by gleeaikin (question authority!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: 867V309
>>Because levin is an idiot?<<

No, far from an idiot. He has an abrasive personality.

162 posted on 03/12/2017 6:20:47 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TBP

What is so friggin hard to understand. REPEAL it to the same healthcare plan before Obama. Duh!


163 posted on 03/12/2017 6:58:04 AM PDT by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TBP

“...unify ...”

Clearly not a word those third parties understand... unfortunately.


164 posted on 03/12/2017 7:29:34 AM PDT by NFHale (The Second Amendment - By Any Means Necessary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

Frankly, just because I agree that Levin asked some good questions does not mean I am “supporting him”...

I understand, and that's fine with me.

But I will not stand by while people say good things about levine here. He's a skunk of the highest order, and anything he says has to be seen through the lens that he's a never Trump, and his goal is STILL to damage the President.


165 posted on 03/12/2017 11:47:53 AM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: plain talk

I don;’t think this monstrosity has the votes to pass the Senate.


166 posted on 03/12/2017 3:04:02 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: itsahoot

How is that? An endorsement from a major conservative talk host somehow lost votes for Trump?


167 posted on 03/12/2017 3:05:04 PM PDT by TBP (0bama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: lodi90

And, again, I find the antipathy and rage toward ANY criticism of Trump deeply, extremely troubling and disheartening. It borders on religious fanaticism — “Thou shalt not speak ill of Dear Leader Trump. Period.” Criticizing for the bad, praising for the good — what an outrageous idea.


168 posted on 03/12/2017 3:08:45 PM PDT by 198ml ("Profit")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: 867V309

Frankly, just because I agree that Levin asked some good questions does not mean I am “supporting him”...

I understand, and that’s fine with me.

But I will not stand by while people say good things about levine here. He’s a skunk of the highest order, and anything he says has to be seen through the lens that he’s a never Trump, and his goal is STILL to damage the President.


Hmm, well I don’t know that I agree that his goal is to still destroy the President...He did actually put out programming last week that supported Trump regarding the Russian/leaking/surveillance fiasco.

That said, I have a long memory and won’t forget Levin’s attitude. However, I rather view this as something similar to WWII where US worked with the Russians to defeat Hitler...We need to work with whoever is supporting Trump at any given time to defeat the elitist/globalist radical progressives. Levin has been very effective in slicing through Ryan’s bullsh*t regarding Rynocare.

I pray President Trump does not fall for Ryan’s progressive trap.


169 posted on 03/12/2017 3:12:34 PM PDT by Freedom56v2 (JOHN 8:32 THEN YOU WILL KNOW THE TRUTH AND THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: Freedom56v2

I pray President Trump does not fall for Ryan’s progressive trap.

I don't pretend to know what Trump's game is here, but if we know anything about Trump, it's that the whole game can turn on a dime. Some here refuse to learn that lesson.


170 posted on 03/12/2017 3:18:40 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: TBP
Major conservative talk host? Get real.

If you think you're going to reinvent, ignore and or somehow erase Levin's comments from the past, you're mistaken. The days of going along to get along are over. Same with Beck, Levin and Limbaugh in my opinion. They had their chance and they blew it good. Like Hugh Blewitt too!

We're surrounded by traitors and posers and others who care only about their ratings and longevity. There is no need to recycle them.

171 posted on 03/12/2017 4:03:14 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: dragnet2

If you think you're going to reinvent, ignore and or somehow erase Levin's comments from the past, you're mistaken. The days of going along to get along are over. Same with Beck, Levin and Limbaugh in my opinion. They had their chance and they blew it good. Like Hugh Blewitt too!

You omitted meth-head med-ved. King of Fake Conservatives       :)


172 posted on 03/12/2017 7:56:08 PM PDT by 867V309 (Lock Her Up)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: Crucial

I saw a post from Jim Thompson, saying “repeal, don’t replace”.

Since he operates this website, I won’t comment. Don’t agree, but won’t comment.

Sorry but you’re only seeing half of the posts on this subject. His right to say that, but there are a lot of people like me, who are just sitting down and not saying what we think, as a result.

Great website Jim.

But you have quashed debate, on a very important issue.

Just my opinion.


173 posted on 03/13/2017 8:30:58 AM PDT by cba123 ( Toi la nguoi My. Toi bay gio o Viet Nam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: TBP
How is that? An endorsement from a major conservative talk host somehow lost votes for Trump?

No the total #NeverTrump tirade he was on for months before his foxhole conversion. You are not that dense.

174 posted on 03/13/2017 10:07:37 AM PDT by itsahoot ( Super Secret, Super Genius Plan #135)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 167 | View Replies]

To: cba123

I’m not sure how I quashed debate but I simply supply my opinion as well. I welcome debate because only through debate can you sometimes get to the kernel of the truth and as a result spread it. That’s why this website is so vitally important.


175 posted on 03/13/2017 11:44:41 AM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-175 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson