Posted on 03/07/2017 10:04:11 AM PST by PJ-Comix
You have probably seen the image below of the New York Times January 20 headline. It has gone viral on web and renders absurd the current denials by the Times and much of the rest of the mainstream media that there was no wiretapping of the Donald Trump campaign by the Obama administration. No, there won't be a document out there signed by former President Obama that says something like "I hereby authorize the wiretapping of the Trump campaign." There doesn't need to be. The headline and its January 19 article makes very clear that the previous administration did secretly monitor communications of the Trump campaign.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...
And now one of that article’s authors says, “Naw, no proof.” Was he lying then or is he lying now?
Maybe the answer is somewhere in the Vault 7 release??
.... They were either lying then or lying now ..... Yup ... Proving that the big problem with lying so much is that you eventually lose track of your own lies and then start lying about your very own lies. (Ya ... I know ... Kinda confusing isn’t it)
Good afternoon.
I have to admit that the CIA using these tools against an enemy would not phase me.
However, the CIA using these tools against its own people is treason.
Time to build some gallows.
5.56mm
Not necessary, he’s done what he needed to do.
Evidence will be revealed as Trump goes about the business of MAGA
You think a ny times employee would be fired for lack of integrity?
Thanks for the laugh.
The Australian and Mexican presidents are Russian puppets, just like President Trump.
As a matter of fact, all three of us are Russian puppets, pretending to have a conversation to fool all the Russian puppets on the other side that may be reading this.
And both the pro-Trump and anti-Trump sides on Twitter and Facebook are Russian puppets - the "arguments" are to keep everyone fooled so that no one looks under their bed and sees Putin looking back at them...
I did tests where I could record speech in rooms 2 or 3 rooms away, around corners, etc.
A MS laptop?
Yes, Win 8.
Just like they did during the campaign with that article about Muslims dancing in the streets on 9/11.
Not
News
Hilarious!
obama is a piece of dog slime. He sent his thugs into Israel, clearly did it, everyone knew he did it, trying to stop the PM from getting reelected. Now, he whines that Russia tried to damage hillarythebeast?? These people are slime. Heck, I am being unfair to slime. Is there any other words to define these criminals, socialists, homos, commies, liberals, garbage,&#*^@E86eknkn, YE&^@HDK76eie%kn and &2746UD&c7dt!!!!!!!!!!!! obama the muzzie is pig poop (insert the other word if you like!!)
See the kimdotcom tweet !!!!
Extremely surprised the NYT didn’t make that page disappear when it started getting talked about...or as much of it as humanly possible.
The problem with that excuse is there will need to be entries in the surveillance logs to back it up. If there are, and that’s a big ‘if’, it is a good bet the President would have by now outed the persons involved to confirm the allegations.
It’s also a good bet the surveillance record is now preserved and under the control of Director Pompeo. so there is very little chance the democrats and their CIA rogue operators could pull a ‘Sandy Berger’ on the logs or alter them.
The FISA warrant application should have the backstory and if the surveillance was ordered direct by Obama, the NSA or CIA will have records of the finding.
The fact that the narrative of Trump and Russians conspiring to rig the election has been dropped and has disappeared is telling.
That last minute order signed by Lynch relaxing the dissemination of raw data to something like 17 agencies is also telling. It shows a blatant attempt by Obama to keep contact with the raw data through his insiders.
As President Trump said the Russian story of rigging the election is a ruse. That points to something else that Obama wanted his leakers to find and be alert to. Because the Russian connection is very likely a ruse (otherwise different actions of President Trump would have been observed), it means the ‘raw data’ must be manufactured to support the ruse.
Somehow, Obama’s spies appear not to have yet been able to pull off what was planned. They are losing. There is an intriguing backstory that is yet to be known.
We know now with certainty that the democrat progressives and their media minions LIE. The backstory is highly likely to be a failed attempt at manufacturing the LIE they needed to present as fact, to discredit the President and to force the President to step down or face impeachment.
Somewhere along this path, there has been a failure by the democrats. That’s where the real story resides, in the details of the failed coup.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.