Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Good analysis from an experienced attorney, with many details for those interested in them.

What I'd like to know is, under 50 USC 1805, is it possible to have a wiretap order issued strictly on the authorization of the Attorney General?

Here is a snippet that contains the wording in question:

"the judge shall enter an ex parte order as requested or as modified approving the electronic surveillance if he finds that - (1) the application has been made by a Federal officer and approved by the Attorney General"

Since we know the request was turned-down once by the FISA court (a rare occurrance indicating the reason for getting the wiretap approval were really weak) - did Obama turn to his own AG to go ahead and do it anyway?

1 posted on 03/04/2017 5:55:19 PM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: bigbob

Obama and Loretta Lynch would look good in orange jumpsuits.


2 posted on 03/04/2017 5:58:50 PM PST by Rockitz (This is NOT rocket science - Follow the money and you'll find the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

No surprise here. Some throw caution to the wind. Obammy throws the Constitution.


3 posted on 03/04/2017 6:00:48 PM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi - Monthly Donors Rock!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Who above the level of Private Bradley Manning has gone to prison for anything like this?


4 posted on 03/04/2017 6:00:57 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (You cannot invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

has to be a probable cause warrant in additional to official sign-off.


5 posted on 03/04/2017 6:01:36 PM PST by KyCats
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Didn’t Obama sign into power a “Warrantless Wiretap Bill” a bunch of years ago?


7 posted on 03/04/2017 6:02:31 PM PST by R_Kangel ( "A Nation of Sheep ..... Will Beget ..... a Nation Ruled by Wolves.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
What about

Flashback: Obama signs warrantless-wiretapping bill into law

9 posted on 03/04/2017 6:03:39 PM PST by TigersEye (We all have a stake in MAGA! We all need to contribute our efforts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

This is criminal — ABSOLUTELY. This is why the fabricated Russia /Trump bull ship was being peddled to idiots!! I have never seen any abuse of office to this magnitude in my life . The make Watergate look like play school, I fully expect some peopple to start flleing the country. Trump needs total air port shut down on these criminals!!


13 posted on 03/04/2017 6:09:11 PM PST by WENDLE (Watch this on John McCain. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0mHEJyC3Y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

When Trump open a grand jury over Fast and Furious then Zero and h0lder may be facing mass murder charges. Trump should pound that.


17 posted on 03/04/2017 6:12:06 PM PST by MtnClimber (For photos of Colorado scenery and wildlife, click on my screen name for my FR home page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Bottom line is that a sitting President WIRETAPPED the candidate from the other party DURING an election. There is no way on God’s green earth that this was not political in nature.


20 posted on 03/04/2017 6:13:31 PM PST by DouglasKC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

I’d bet on it


21 posted on 03/04/2017 6:13:33 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

No, on that last point. They went back in October with another version, which was approved this time.


22 posted on 03/04/2017 6:14:18 PM PST by expat2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
Am I correct to say 'whoa' to the following? I thought Sessions replacement having recused himself would be a sniveling O appointee ... but this paragraph appears to say 'not exactly so' - that while it's technically an O appointee - meaning he can't be claimed to be a Trump shill, it's one O removed because he feared him as Session's backup ... but then Trump reinstated him.

" Democrats may regret Sessions’ recusal, as his replacement is a mini-Sessions: a long-respected, a-political, highly ethical prosecutor, Dana Boente, whose reputation is well-warranted from his service at the Tax Division, and who won’t be limited by any perceived ties to Trump, given his prior appointment by Obama. Obama himself appeared scared of Boente, as he removed Boente from the successor-to-Sessions position during the lame-duck part of Obama’s presidency, but Trump restored Boente to that role earlier this month. Democrats may get the investigation they wanted, but it may be their own that end up named in the indictment."

26 posted on 03/04/2017 6:17:21 PM PST by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

27 posted on 03/04/2017 6:17:59 PM PST by Vendome (I've Gotta Be Me - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wH-pk2vZG2M)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Here is my prediction.

Democrats will soon, very soon quit calling for an investigation,
because an investigation will uncover Watergate style corruption
and criminal activity on the part of Obama and his Intel henchmen.
Many RATs will go to jail over this.
That’s my prediction and I’m sticking to it.


28 posted on 03/04/2017 6:17:59 PM PST by tennmountainman ("Prophet Mountainman" Predicter Of All Things RINO...for a small pittance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Obama will have first learned of the wiretaps on the news tomorrow morning.


29 posted on 03/04/2017 6:19:37 PM PST by tinyowl (A is A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob
Now I understand why Sessions recused himself. The democrat fascists were planning on using wiretap evidence they could distort to make their case and now they've denied they ever wiretapped Trump.

Trump and Sessions played this nicely.

JMHo

31 posted on 03/04/2017 6:21:22 PM PST by Rashputin (Jesus Christ doesn't evacuate His troops, He leads them to victory !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

Please Lord God, let this be so!


32 posted on 03/04/2017 6:21:35 PM PST by parmamenian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

>There Could Be Serious Legal Problems if Obama Admin Involved in Illegal Surveillance<

.
Stop dreaming.

Anyone going to press charges against the first black POTUS?

Get real.


37 posted on 03/04/2017 6:25:05 PM PST by 353FMG (AMERICA FIRST.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

There is two things

There could be and illegal wiretap and illegal use of the information.. given to the Hillary campaign for political use

Or

You could have a legal wiretap it had a warrant but a illegal use of the information... given to the Hillary campaign for political use

Flynn call was potentially legally recorded but the information was illegally used for political purposes


38 posted on 03/04/2017 6:27:07 PM PST by tophat9000 (Tophat9000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: bigbob

??????IF???????


40 posted on 03/04/2017 6:28:30 PM PST by connyankee (#MAGABEGINS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson