Posted on 02/23/2017 5:44:03 PM PST by madprof98
The British, gay provocateur and former Breitbart editor is everything that traditionalists hate: bold, politically incorrect, unapologetic, and often offensive. He uses his unconventional style to spread conservatism, offend snowflakes and promote free speech. Milo is so controversial, many mainstream conservatives have completely written him off, for fear of tarnishing the GOP brand.
While it may be tempting to disassociate with Milo, the Republican Party must listen up and learn a few lessons from the controversial Brit especially if it wants to expand its base among young voters, who now make up the nations largest voting bloc.
The year of Trump arguably would not be so without Milo. His deft use of social media, especially Twitter, was second to none until his ban. Milos press conferences brought back shades of Andrew Breitbart himself his edgy, sardonic side was a shot in the arm of a race once considered Hillary Clinton's.
The GOP establishment would ignore that at its peril.
Milo probably wont be a senator one day. He will probably not run Fox News or CNN. I doubt hell be a regular on The McLaughlin Group. However, he will be a trailblazer for a new brand of conservatism: modern, blunt and always ready to fight back.
Im sure there will be a name for it then, but we can probably coin it today as The Milo Effect.
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...
I have not dug in on this dude, but if anyone has ever approved of diddling kids or used their sex quirks for recognition, then get off the stage.
His career is going to be fine. This week alone there have been 4 Million articles written by cuck conservatives claiming they’ve never heard of him.
He couldn’t possibly be making a dent.
You can find it here.
GOP - old, wants to coexist
Milo - young, wants to WIN
As I see it, that is precisely the difference. And I think that was the point the young author of this article was trying to make as well.
But she IS the author.
Oh my Lord, that picture is a little edgy. Quick kick her out of the debate! Shut her down! Ban her! Burn her books!
You can find it here.
***
Ahem.
Ewwwwwww.
Having said that, I still feel obliged to cut him a little slack because of how sexual abuse can warp the mind of an abused child. Again, talking from experience.
Or maybe less cutting him slack, and more feeling very sorry for him because of what that did to him. I can certainly see why he could come to believe that, at least if I remember his biography correctly.
Even if it’s horrible.
Sexual abuse sucks.
The article is OK, but that headline is misleading.
Milo bump.
Love the Milo! Hope he stays around! Makes the leftist and the RINOs crazy.
Tell me the last time a single democrat, elected or not, caught doing anything wrong or saying anything wrong, mattered to the DNC or was their problem???? Double standards no longer work.
Milo is not a pedo, but George Takei and Bill Maher are. Haven’t heard that from the MSM yet.
If for no other reason, this introduces Kristin Tate to me. What a beautiful, intelligent conservative bulldog! Nobody interrupts her. She is a terrific TV debater.
She’s an Emerson College graduate.
Young conservative men should take a gander at this lass.
I seem to have missed it.
I've sexually molested myself.
Does this count?
I think she has molested me.
If not me; then at LEAST Laz!!
Milo didn’t molest anyone, Bill Clinton did.
Is it Ok for a 50 year old man to have sex with a 9-12 year old girl or is it disgusting and vile?
This is the first and only question that should be asked of the Left who have mounted a rabid defense of a religion whose un-holy Prophet did just this.
Milo was a homosexual infiltrator and the resulting harm to the GOP and the conservative movement was contrived. IMHO.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.