Before 1930, All Christian Denominations Opposed Contraception
Sex is a need. Like food. And the OT message of “be fruitful and multiply” was replaced by Paul’s (i paraphrase) “it is better to remain single, but if you are horny, get married so you don’t sin.”
Nothing there about contraception being good or bad.
What does our race have to do with anything?
Not much existed in the way of contraception in 1930.
Prehistoric condoms and some crude spermacides were about it. I doubt the topic even came up to anywhere near the extent it does today.
Somewhere along the way people lost sight of the fact that children are a blessing from The Lord.
What’s wrong with birth control?
Agreed. This vanity post sounds like a KKK promotion on race.
BTTT!
We have been warned. Read Humanae Vitae.
I have read Tolstoy’s “Anna Karenina”. There is a scene where Levin describes urban couples who in my comprehension sterilize themselves. This is related to Anna sterilizing herself after giving girth to her bastard child. Levin describes how unnatural it is.
Catechism of the Catholic Church
2399 The regulation of births represents one of the aspects of responsible fatherhood and motherhood. Legitimate intentions on the part of the spouses do not justify recourse to morally unacceptable means (for example, direct sterilization or contraception).
2370 Periodic continence, that is, the methods of birth regulation based on self-observation and the use of infertile periods, is in conformity with the objective criteria of morality. These methods respect the bodies of the spouses, encourage tenderness between them, and favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, “every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible” is intrinsically evil:
Thus the innate language that expresses the total reciprocal self-giving of husband and wife is overlaid, through contraception, by an objectively contradictory language, namely, that of not giving oneself totally to the other. This leads not only to a positive refusal to be open to life but also to a falsification of the inner truth of conjugal love, which is called upon to give itself in personal totality. . . . The difference, both anthropological and moral, between contraception and recourse to the rhythm of the cycle . . . involves in the final analysis two irreconcilable concepts of the human person and of human sexuality.
So Christianity is a white thing?
Yes but the track record of these Austrailoid Caucasian hybrids and the fact once they establish in the west or become more financially successful in their homelands their birth rate cliff dives
It’s a weird paradox but comfort and ease of life means fewer kids
Plus less agrarian pursuits do too
Btw yes I know Brahmin class Indians are considered white as me
And some are
To be honest I’m not that impressed
Neither them or Pakis much less Bangladesh are Japan or Germany smarts wise
I think it is only the Amish, old older Mennonites, Catholics and some independents like the quiver full folks that haven’t accepted it yet. The Amish, old order Mennonites and Catholics haven’t accepted civil divorce and remarriage either to my understanding.
Freegards
But, but - with no contraception, you can’t f*** who you want, when, where, and how you want while avoiding responsibility.
How could we survive?
I often say, “Wealth is the best environmental policy” (because only people with means can afford to care much about the environment) and “Wealth is the most effective contraceptive” (largely because people with means don’t need to reproduce simply to have a retirement plan).
It’s not that any race is in a race to breed themselves out. It’s that the wealthier people become, the fewer children they tend to have. There’s a knock-on effect, so to speak, because as more and more of the higher-wealth people have fewer and fewer children, it becomes fashionable not to have children, just as it has become fashionable not to smoke.
I feel like “white” is being used as a synonym for “christian” in this article. That is pretty racist.
Do we want the world to be more “white?” Is that our goal?
Intersting all white locations are favorited by China?
Bump