Posted on 02/16/2017 3:43:53 AM PST by blam
Submitted by James George Jatras via The Strategic Culture Foundation
After barely two weeks in office Donald Trump has stunned the world with his «shock and awe» campaign to keep promises made when he was a candidate. The mere fact of a politician doing what he said he would do seems to have unsettled the nerves of his opponents. What is called «Trump Derangement Syndrome» is already reaching critical proportions.
Withdrawing from the Trans-Pacific Partnership, ordering a start on his Mexican border wall, ordering an investigation into voter fraud (if conducted properly, almost certain to uncover widespread unlawful voting by non-citizens both legally and illegally present in the U.S., since no proof of citizenship is required to register), insisting he wants to get along with «killer» Vladimir Putin, and cutting short a call with Australia’s prime minister over Barack Obama’s idiotic promise to take in Muslim refugees that our mates Down Under don’t want themselves – all of these have infuriated the usual suspects.
But the declaration of war was his order to impose restrictions on entry from seven majority-Muslim countries designated as trouble spots by Obama with nary a peep from the progressive watchdogs of «tolerance» and anti-«Islamophobia». As Srdja Trifkovic has noted, Trump’s order is the first step in instigating an ideological test to bar jihad ideologues from the United States. (See «The Real ‘Muslim Ban’» and my «If He Doesn’t Like Trump’s Exclusion of All Muslims, Obama Must Exclude Advocates of Sharia and Caliphate»).
If Trump prevails on his exclusion order, he has the high ground to crush his opponents in both political parties – and they know it. That’s why the reaction has been both hysterical and cynical. Mainstream media, inveterate enemies of Trump and the American people...
(snip)
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...
Far be it from me to insult a fellow hi-tech redneck: them's good people.
“So first we surrender?”
Is FR where reading and comprehension goes to die?
It’s like I’m talking to a couple of SJWs.
Matthew 6:5
You decided to rip into dp0622 for actually wanting to take action rather than sit back and snipe about “reading and comprehension”... Not me.
I saw no suggestion of anything from you as an alternative, just some snarky remark about pussy hats.
For what do you advocate?
“You decided to rip into dp0622 for actually wanting to take action “
like I said, you cant read, and cant stop making yourself look like an idiot
“Conservatives look for excuses as to why they cant even counter protest the left.
We need to participate in the digital/information/demonstration war that is instead of bragging about winning a shooting war that may never happen. It’s little more than telling the left to terrorize as much as you want short of shooting at people, because anything short of that isn’t going to excite the right enough to do much more than complain.”
“How about we GET OFF our asses, take off from work and head to DC. A million.
The digital age? are you kidding?
They have the msm, hollywood and a million other things
get real.”
Now when you learn to read above 4th grade levels, then feel free to reply with something other your goofy emotional responses.
He who defines the issue wins the debate. "Voter fraud" is almost impossible to prove because of the anonymous nature of voting.
Election fraud. Because of Motor Voter, many ineligible to vote are registered anyway. That's election fraud.
How many actually vote? No one knows, including the RATs. But it's a hole in the system.
How many crooked poll workers? Who knows?
Defining the issue as "voter fraud" ensures we will chase our tails.
"Would you like your own pussy hat to go with your day of marching? One day of making a show of yourself isnt going to make these people go away. It may make you FEEL good. Like what do you plan to do 24 hour later? Whine and cry that the media is making you out to be crazies? Yeah, I didn’t think you had a clue either. That is why I made my point. You either win the propaganda war, or you can save the trip to DC.So this wasn't you?
Trump is our last chance to defend ourselves within the system.
No but they can make us a tiny minority. If they force Trump out they know they need to open the floodgates and dilute us even faster.
“Or Will His Enemies Drag Him (And The Country) Down?”
Not if we lowly peasants pick up our pitchforks and fight.
Here’s a good place to start............contact them.....
https://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
It’s still like YOU CANNOT READ!
Did you MISS this:
“One day of making a show of yourself isnt going to make these people go away. It may make you FEEL good. Like what do you plan to do 24 hour later?”
If you are able to THINK, you would understand that merely going to a rally all the way in DC is USELESS unless you bookend it with efforts outside of physically flying across the country to rally and chant, and THEN GO HOME!
The truth is that you are plainly too damn stupid to understand people’s points. You just want to blow hot air like the moron leftists I have to debate.
“If your complaint is that I didn’t read every single piece of tripe that you’ve posted in this thread before responding: Guilty as charged.”
Plainly sense you cant follow a simply conversation thread.
If you cant be bothered to do it, then do other people a favor and stay out of them in the future.
Not to mention 12 years of destruction under Bush presidencies and 8 years of Clinton. They were all enemies of America.
Rough Thread !
I didn’t miss anything, as a matter of fact I just quoted it in the post you’re replying to...
Again, your entire response and continuation is based on the supposition that YOU know what dp0622 is thinking, or doing, or planning. It just ain’t so.
I read and understand what you wrote PERFECTLY. If you didn’t write what you meant, that ain’t my problem.
“I read and understand what you wrote PERFECTLY”
You have no idea what I was even talking about, admitted that you didn’t bother to read everything, and continue to demonstrate that you rather keep on with the stubborn mule act rather than admit that you should have asked questions if you were confused.
I have no problem if you want to play stupid because your pride was hurt. You are only wasting your own time.
Your words.
“Your words.”
What, is that like some alternate form of saying “I cant even”?
If you are out of argument. That is perfectly fine, no shame in that.
Honestly, I’d have to bet all my money on President Trump coming out on top.
“You seem to now insist that those words don’t mean what they clearly say, or that reading every moronic post in this thread is necessary for “context”.”
Which roughly translates into “I’m too lazy to follow conversations, and I should be able to just say stuff because of muh feels”.
If you cant take the time, then DONT REPLY.
Again, my original post:
We need to participate in the digital/information/demonstration war that is instead of bragging about winning a shooting war that may never happen. It’s little more than telling the left to terrorize as much as you want short of shooting at people, because anything short of that isn’t going to excite the right enough to do much more than complain.”
The original reply for it from the poor aggrieved “victim”:
“get real.”
Your demonstration of not being able to follow a conversation:
“You insulted a fellow Freeper for wanting to take action”
And here is another part of that conversation you are either too lazy (by your own admission) or stupid to have read:
“Go to DC if you feel compelled, but realize that is not the magical end all.”
“What would VanDeKoik do?”
Already explained that in my OP. Not shocked that you cant figure that out either.
“Anyone reading this thread can clearly see that you’re quick with an underhanded insult, but not too facile with reason or logic. I have no more work to do on that topic.”
LOL! You cant even read, dude. You cant follow conversations, you are shown to be clueless, and then you try to pat yourself on the back for being too butthurt to admit it!
“Do you have anything to add, aside from the typical ad-hominem?”
Pick up a textbook from an elementary reading class, and try harder next time. LOL!
I swear leftists I debate are less dense than this.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.