Replies

“You seem to now insist that those words don’t mean what they clearly say, or that reading every moronic post in this thread is necessary for “context”.”

Which roughly translates into “I’m too lazy to follow conversations, and I should be able to just say stuff because of muh feels”.

If you cant take the time, then DONT REPLY.

Again, my original post:

“Conservatives look for excuses as to why they cant even counter protest the left.

We need to participate in the digital/information/demonstration war that is instead of bragging about winning a shooting war that may never happen. It’s little more than telling the left to terrorize as much as you want short of shooting at people, because anything short of that isn’t going to excite the right enough to do much more than complain.”

The original reply for it from the poor aggrieved “victim”:

“get real.”

Your demonstration of not being able to follow a conversation:

“You insulted a fellow Freeper for wanting to take action”

And here is another part of that conversation you are either too lazy (by your own admission) or stupid to have read:

“Go to DC if you feel compelled, but realize that is not the magical end all.”

“What would VanDeKoik do?”

Already explained that in my OP. Not shocked that you cant figure that out either.

“Anyone reading this thread can clearly see that you’re quick with an underhanded insult, but not too facile with reason or logic. I have no more work to do on that topic.”

LOL! You cant even read, dude. You cant follow conversations, you are shown to be clueless, and then you try to pat yourself on the back for being too butthurt to admit it!

“Do you have anything to add, aside from the typical ad-hominem?”

Pick up a textbook from an elementary reading class, and try harder next time. LOL!

I swear leftists I debate are less dense than this.

Dearest FRiend,

It was never my intention to refute, or even to comment on everything you've ever said.

I replied to a single post in my original response, and quite frankly don't give a toss about your other posts, or other opinions. You may choose to view this as "lazy", as you have repeatedly asserted, but you'd be wrong...

They just aren't important to me. I think that should be quite clear to anyone other than a purposefully obtuse imbecile, or a troll.

"We need to participate in the digital/information/demonstration war that is instead of bragging about winning a shooting war that may never happen. It’s little more than telling the left to terrorize as much as you want short of shooting at people, because anything short of that isn’t going to excite the right enough to do much more than complain.”

Haven't you noticed that this statement is incoherent and has no meaning?
Has no one pointed that out besides me?
You're not advocating for any defined action whatsoever.

You'll notice I joined the conversation after you began mocking another poster for advocating specific action.
You can deny that was your intent if you choose, but you cannot deny that those were your words
I'll happily leave the conversation now that your chosen activity is to argue about what the argument is about.

“Do you have anything to add, aside from the typical ad-hominem?” add: Your incoherent rambling

I'll take that as a no.