Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Eviscerate....such a great word....


2 posted on 02/13/2017 12:47:52 PM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Sacajaweau
Eviscerate....such a great word....

Great, but inaccurate. Evisceration is only effective if the victim has guts. And George Stephanopoulos has no guts.

9 posted on 02/13/2017 1:02:42 PM PST by 60Gunner (The price of apathy towards public affairs is to be ruled by evil men. - Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
Eviscerate....such a great word....

"There's a good woody sort of word."

11 posted on 02/13/2017 1:05:52 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

“Eviscerate....such a great word....”

“Gut like a fish” isn’t a bad turn of phrase either. :)


16 posted on 02/13/2017 1:12:12 PM PST by PLMerite
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau
"Eviscerate....such a great word...."

I look forward to seeing George Stephanopoulos drawn and quartered by a White House adviser.

37 posted on 02/13/2017 2:04:46 PM PST by Carl Vehse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

He did a great job.


38 posted on 02/13/2017 2:09:38 PM PST by marsmanmd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Sacajaweau

Eviscerate is a stupid and non applicable term to this interview. Stephanopoulos is a tough interviewer with the hide of a rhino. Being thick skinned and impervious to criticism is a requirement for being a talking head. Miller did well in stating policy clearly, BUT he appeared mechanical, expressionless and reactive. We have simply got to get it through our heads that the MSM talking heads are the freaking enemy and they deserve nothing but contempt, satire, irony, mockery, humor. Job 1 for any of us being interviewed is to question the legitimacy of the interviewer’s question by preceeding any comment of the substance of the question with an analysis of the question itself, the reasons it is being asked, it’s legitimacy as topical, its undercurrent of carping bias, its habituality, its banality and suggest a better way the question could have been asked The objective is to do what Trump so masterfully does- ATTACK the questioner and the question, delegitimize his techniques attack the ethics of the question, Say straight up in his face “that’s a stupid question” and then “for the following reasons” and enumerate them until the interviewer’s head explodes. Never be on the defensive in an interview, but also don’t express an angry face. Be smiley, superior, professorial, chiding, mocking but never angry. Make the interviewer angry and mention that he seems a little angry or flutered as you answer his quesiont. Be able to talk over his interruptions or bring attention to the fact that being interrupted is bigoted journalism, an attempt at stage managing sound bite. The overarching objective here is to make the MSM news AFRAID to interview Trump’s people because they will get a shovel upside the head every time. ATTACK.


55 posted on 02/14/2017 9:27:37 AM PST by Yollopoliuhqui (Smarter - Faster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson