Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/10/2017 10:55:34 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: patro; abb; SE Mom; HarleyLady27; connyankee; Behind Liberal Lines; Miss Marple; ...

Chris Matthews criticizes 9th Circuit ruling on multiple grounds.

Flying pig alert to Liberal Media Criticism list.


2 posted on 02/10/2017 10:59:03 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest (FReepmail or ping me to be put on my ping list for criticism of liberal media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

But it will allow the judges to continue getting invites to beautiful people parties, so no worries.


3 posted on 02/10/2017 10:59:09 AM PST by rightwingcrazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I was making the point to Mrs. Thinking this morning about this (Trump bias at court). The last four POTI have placed a total of 42 holds, and noone said a word. Ebola did it more than any of the others, even. And then the law that explicitly says in so many words the Admin has the authority to do this. It’s all about what they feel about Trump personally.


4 posted on 02/10/2017 11:02:07 AM PST by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

He’s a liberal, but more of an old-school liberal than a new-school antifa jackboot/snowflake.


7 posted on 02/10/2017 11:05:43 AM PST by oblomov (We have passed the point where "law," properly speaking, has any further application. - C. Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

A judge who ignores the law is a so-called judge


11 posted on 02/10/2017 11:09:55 AM PST by joshua c (Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

Another problem with the ruling that no one mentions is that Trump’s case, which is based on a Conservative interpretation of the Constitution, was prepared by employees of the U.S. Department of Justice who are overwhelmingly Leftist.

I don’t know anything about the lead DOJ attorney, maybe he is actually a Conservative.

But a great general has very little value if his troops refuse to fight.

Two things jump out at me about the two appeals.

(1) The issue of “standing,” which is of paramount importance in federal cases, was never even discussed by the DOJ attorneys.

(2) The statute that outlines the president’s immigration powers could not be more clear. But, the DOJ attorneys never even asked the appellate judges what Constitutional principles were violated by the Executive Order.


13 posted on 02/10/2017 11:20:39 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

I just saw a pig fly by my window................


15 posted on 02/10/2017 11:27:33 AM PST by Red Badger (If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: governsleastgovernsbest

If Obama had made this executive order would the results have been the same? Obviously no.


17 posted on 02/10/2017 11:39:04 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson