Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Law That Never Was
American Thinker ^ | February 10, 2017 | Allan J. Favish

Posted on 02/10/2017 6:01:45 AM PST by AJFavish

The key point for everybody to know about the United States Court Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion regarding President Donald Trump’s Executive Order regarding immigration, is that the three judges failed to discuss, or even acknowledge the existence of, the primary law that supports President Trump’s Executive Order.

(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 9thcircuit; circuit; immigration; order; refugees; travelban; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

1 posted on 02/10/2017 6:01:45 AM PST by AJFavish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

This is true. Good piece.


2 posted on 02/10/2017 6:05:44 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Slam dunk at the Supreme Court?


3 posted on 02/10/2017 6:06:09 AM PST by TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed (Yahuah Yahusha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

The Progressive/Liberal/Socialists/Democrats will not give up easy. We have won a Battle but the War Continues https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7lwGvM39GFY


4 posted on 02/10/2017 6:06:59 AM PST by Halo-JM (Common Sense is not so Common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Now that it has been determined that the three 9th circuit judges have failed to consider the law which definitely supports Trump’s position, WHO will be filing the motion for impeachment of those same judges? WHO, or more importantly, WHEN? Go for the throat and teach the liberal bastards that THEY failed to consider our laws when making such a extremely important decision. There are consequences.


5 posted on 02/10/2017 6:11:51 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

It appears the author is suggesting that this decision could be used to impeach these three judges.


6 posted on 02/10/2017 6:14:27 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

As well as, the original judge who ordered the stay.


7 posted on 02/10/2017 6:17:06 AM PST by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Douglas

I hope so. It is way past time to put these Judicial Tyrants in their place for their assumption of powers that the Constitution clearly denies them.


8 posted on 02/10/2017 6:17:47 AM PST by yuleeyahoo (Those are my principles, and if you do not like them...well I have others. - Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish; Mr. Douglas; RayofHope

Thanks for posting; very important point that the judge didn’t quote the law in his decision.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3523395/posts?page=6#6

(h/t Mr.Douglas)

Time to impeach that judge, and also have another EO ready... and get Gorsuch confirmed


9 posted on 02/10/2017 6:21:57 AM PST by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

As well as, the original judge who ordered the stay.


Yes. I missed that. He, also, did not mention it to the best of my knowledge. Actually, he didn’t say much other than to announce his decision, sans any reasoning behind it.


10 posted on 02/10/2017 6:30:08 AM PST by Mr. Douglas (Best. Election. EVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

I can’t help but wonder if Trump is once again playing a bigger game. He would be hard pressed to find a more unambiguous statute, he didn’t send the A team in to defend it, he goaded the 9th circus into doing what they did.

Now we’ll have to see how it plays out...


11 posted on 02/10/2017 6:38:24 AM PST by GMMC0987
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

Can any legal minds here state in plain language what the actual question the 9th circuit was considering?


12 posted on 02/10/2017 6:43:09 AM PST by maxtheripper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GMMC0987

Hmmm.... now that is an interesting thought. You have correctly assessed the situation and historical lay of the land.


13 posted on 02/10/2017 6:44:35 AM PST by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... Macroagression melts snowflakes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
"Slam dunk at the Supreme Court?"

No, same problem, 3 or 4 of the SC justices will rule how they want the outcome to be and not according to the law.

14 posted on 02/10/2017 7:02:12 AM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish

15 posted on 02/10/2017 7:04:21 AM PST by Travis McGee (EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish
The key point for everybody to know about the United States Court Appeals for the Ninth Circuit’s opinion regarding President Donald Trump’s Executive Order regarding immigration, is that the three judges failed to discuss, or even acknowledge the existence of, the primary law that supports President Trump’s Executive Order.

To them, the law is whatever happens to flit into their empty heads at the moment. Precedence is a dead concept to them.

They are attempting to usurp the Executive Branch's function and purpose.

16 posted on 02/10/2017 7:06:36 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Love Trumping Hate" sure involves a lot more assault and arson than I expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed

This one is so clear, that — unless the Supreme Court decides to completely jetison the meaning of all words, and totally shred their credibility, and even emperil their existence — that I predict a 8-0 or 9-0 rebuke of the Ninth Plane of Hell’s ruling.


17 posted on 02/10/2017 7:08:51 AM PST by Lazamataz ("Love Trumping Hate" sure involves a lot more assault and arson than I expected.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: AJFavish; donaldtrump

http://www.allanfavish.com/index.php/biography


18 posted on 02/10/2017 7:10:01 AM PST by novemberslady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
Slam dunk at the Supreme Court?

Don't bet on it!

19 posted on 02/10/2017 7:11:06 AM PST by Don Corleone (.leave the gun, take the canolis, take it to the mattress.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
Slam dunk at the Supreme Court?

No.

Judges are drawn from a particular class. Supreme Court Justices, even more so, This class has firm beliefs about right and wrong, justice and injustice, and in the case of some of them, about Tikkun Olam, the necessity of using whatever tools are in their hands to set the world right.

John Lennon expressed the beliefs of this class concisely:

Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too

Imagine all the people living life in peace, you
You may say I'm a dreamer
But I'm not the only one
I hope some day you'll join us
And the world will be as one

We the People sent Donald Trump, let's be honest, to destroy their world.To blow up their favorite ride at Disney World (It's a Small World After All). To napalm the idiots singing "Imagine" in Times Square on New Year's Eve.

You don't think they're going to give up what they've built, on the cusp of their total victory, because the hated white working class, which is supposed to die (Williamson) or be replaced by brown and yellow people (Kristol) sent an orange Cheeto man to the White House, do you?

This is their plan: Donald Trump will need to ask a District Judge every time he wants to fart, or else he will be sued into oblivion, until he quits or is impeached and removed for farting without permission.

And to be honest, I can't think (right now) of what the proper counter is.

I just know that Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell are laughing their asses off this morning with their good friends Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer.

20 posted on 02/10/2017 7:23:04 AM PST by Jim Noble (Die Gedanken sind Frei)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-50 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson