Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feds drop case against man accused of posting Facebook threats to Trump
Sun-Sentinal ^ | January 19, 2017 | Paula McMahon

Posted on 01/24/2017 1:49:50 PM PST by SSS Two

A Broward man who was accused of posting Facebook threats to kill or harm President-elect Donald Trump was released from jail Thursday after federal prosecutors dropped the allegations, jail and court records show.

Kevin Keith Krohn, 59, who was never formally charged, was released just one day before Trump's inauguration.

He was arrested Dec. 21 at his Pembroke Pines home after law enforcement informed the U.S. Secret Service agents who protect Trump about the postings.

Agents said that Krohn wrote, "I'm just glad Obama didn't take all our gunz! I see a good use for one now," above a picture of Trump that read, "He's not my president / He's an enemy of the state."

Agents said Krohn posted another comment: "The EXPEDITER of Trump! He will never last long!" above a picture of a man in camouflage holding a scoped sniper rifle.

Krohn responded, "Keep yer eyes open!" when another Facebook user asked what he meant. 

Krohn, who has a history of arrests, did not seek to be released on bond and remained jailed on the allegation from Dec. 21 to Jan. 19. He told the agents who arrested him that he did not intend to threaten Trump and that his comments were merely an expression of his First Amendment rights to free speech.

(Excerpt) Read more at sun-sentinel.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: DiogenesLamp

He’s a keyboard commando. He’s all for others threatening to kill. But when called on to make those same threats himself - He runs off.


21 posted on 01/24/2017 2:25:06 PM PST by Responsibility2nd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

Oh Jeez...He looks bat shit crazy to me in the Charlie Mason tradition! His ass should be locked up for that stare alone!


22 posted on 01/24/2017 2:26:53 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oatka
How do you feel about the right to yell "FIRE!" (when there isn't one) in a crowded enclosure?

Falsely shouting "Fire" in a crowded theater is not protected Free Speech. (See: Schenck v. United States).

Crude political hyperbole is not a knowing and willful threat against the President of the United States. (See: Watts v. United States). Hope that clears it up for you.

23 posted on 01/24/2017 2:26:55 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
...gunz...

Straight off the DUmp...that's the dictated way to spell it for the primitive morons.

Skinner would have it no other way.

Sleazy, sleazy site.

24 posted on 01/24/2017 2:27:23 PM PST by OldSmaj (The only thing washed on a filthy liberal is their damned brains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Please clarify. I can't tell whether you are expressing sarcasm or seriousness.

It appears most people on this site would like to imprison this clown for something he said that is fully protected by the #FirstAmendment.

25 posted on 01/24/2017 2:28:52 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: treetopsandroofs; darkwing104

Hmmm. IBTZ? (Obviously not directed toward you.)


26 posted on 01/24/2017 2:29:28 PM PST by piytar (http://www.truthrevolt.org/videos/bill-whittle-number-one-bullet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
See Watts v. United States. Like Watts, Krohn was making a political statement. The United States does not imprison people for making political statements.

Wasn't the court filled mostly with Liberal idiots in 1969?

27 posted on 01/24/2017 2:30:16 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Wasn’t the court filled mostly with Liberal idiots in 1969?..I believe you are correct.


28 posted on 01/24/2017 2:32:49 PM PST by AngelesCrestHighway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp
Wasn't the court filled mostly with Liberal idiots in 1969?

Don't know / Don't Care ... I'm okay with it as long as the Court upholds the #FirstAmendment

29 posted on 01/24/2017 2:33:39 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
It appears most people on this site would like to imprison this clown for something he said that is fully protected by the #FirstAmendment.

The purpose of the first amendment is to allow people to criticize governmental officials without fear of them using their powers of office to enact revenge upon the speakers. It was a rejection of the common abuse of power that English authorities engaged in with people who criticized them.

It's scope and intent was never to permit threats of violence directed at members of the government. That is a bridge too far to claim first amendment protection, and I don't care that a 1969 Liberal court enshrined their stupidity into legal precedent.

Even in that decision they acknowledge that threatening the President is illegal, they just didn't think that what Watts said met the level of seriousness necessary to constitute a violation of the law.

Given the kooks we have nowadays, I think all such interpretations of "intent" should err on the side of caution. The United States Republic will not suffer any great loss of freedom if a strict interpretation of laws against threatening the Presidency are enforced.

30 posted on 01/24/2017 2:39:46 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

So what you’re saying is that you think our #FirstAmendment rights are too robust in 2017, and you think they should be constrained by the more narrow definition you’ve outlined above?


31 posted on 01/24/2017 2:43:50 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: AngelesCrestHighway
Wasn’t the court filled mostly with Liberal idiots in 1969?..I believe you are correct.

And throughout the 1960s and 1970s. My recollection from American History is that they were doing everything they could to let criminals get away with criminal behavior.

Crime started uptrending in 1974.


32 posted on 01/24/2017 2:44:14 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two

I’m curious what happened to those that did same to Obama. These assassination threats to Trump are out of control and need to send message it’s not alright.


33 posted on 01/24/2017 2:47:10 PM PST by VermithraxPejorative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
So what you’re saying is that you think our #FirstAmendment rights are too robust in 2017, and you think they should be constrained by the more narrow definition you’ve outlined above?

What I am saying is that no one ever had the right to threaten the life of a government official. It never was a right.

We modern folk are too accustomed to paying heed to the Liberal crap that has been turned out by the Liberal courts since Roosevelt. Much of it is just garbage. Garbage with official sanction from the "judiciary", but garbage none the less.

34 posted on 01/24/2017 2:47:36 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: VermithraxPejorative
I’m curious what happened to those that did same to Obama.

Political hyperbole was ruled to be Free Speech.

35 posted on 01/24/2017 2:54:07 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

It appears to me that you’re arguing that we’ve got too many protections for Freedom of Speech going around in 2017, and that you think some of them should be stripped away.


36 posted on 01/24/2017 2:58:46 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: piytar

We can hope.


37 posted on 01/24/2017 2:59:06 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
It appears to me that you’re arguing that we’ve got too many protections for Freedom of Speech going around in 2017, and that you think some of them should be stripped away.

It appears to me that people added on a bunch of fake "freedoms" that never existed.

I have little doubt that had anyone threatened to shoot George Washington in 1790, he would have been immediately tossed in prison. Of course George Washington was a major bad-ass, so it is just as likely that George Washington would have simply challenged him to a duel and killed him.

Jackson did in fact do this for lesser offenses than that.

38 posted on 01/24/2017 3:04:42 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Look for ways to expand our #FirstAmendment rights, not ways to restrict them.


39 posted on 01/24/2017 3:06:14 PM PST by SSS Two
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: SSS Two
Political hyperbole was ruled to be Free Speech.

There is a reason they call it the "ninth circus." That is the single largest collection of kookbat liberal judges in the nation.

They are the most overturned circuit in the US.

40 posted on 01/24/2017 3:07:23 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson