Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Fedora; WMarshal

Considering how inept Chelsea was as a “news contributor” for awhile there when she would freeze any time a camera was pointed at her, i would think she would not be a contender.

However, I did notice she was ver comfortable in front of the camera during her mother’s campaign.

She has expressed a desire to be in politics (after all, she knows it’s a gravy train from her parents). Expect it be be a continuation of Hillary’s roster of grievances.


15 posted on 01/18/2017 3:05:02 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]


To: BunnySlippers

I could also see her in an off-camera role working in one of the Clintons’ nonprofit schemes.


20 posted on 01/18/2017 3:10:45 AM PST by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: BunnySlippers

I don’t see it. She is even less appealing than Hitlery, albeit without quite as much baggage. She is probably up to her neck in Clinton Foundation corruption, but that is still less than Hitlery’s treasonous baggage.

Nothing the democrats do would surprise me, though.


90 posted on 01/18/2017 7:03:55 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson