Skip to comments.
Judges Reject Orange County's Claim That Social Workers Didn't Know Lying In Court Was Wrong
ocweekly.com ^
| 1-6-2017
| R. SCOTT MOXLEY
Posted on 01/17/2017 7:30:00 AM PST by servo1969
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
To: Red Badger
To: servo1969
Negan & Lucille would get their minds right.
22
posted on
01/17/2017 8:09:44 AM PST
by
kiryandil
(Will Hillary's BrownShirt Media thugs demand that The Deplorables all wear six-pointed Orange Stars?)
To: catman67
I thought that was sort of a guideline, a suggestion.
23
posted on
01/17/2017 8:13:36 AM PST
by
ichabod1
(Make America Normal Again)
To: TexasGator
24
posted on
01/17/2017 8:14:12 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
To: servo1969
It is California. So it could be true that they did not know.
25
posted on
01/17/2017 8:19:02 AM PST
by
sport
To: servo1969
Show me in the State Constitution where it says you:
“Cannot put lying social workers into a wood chipper.”
You won’t find it.
To: Red Badger
So why selectively bold the hiring part as if it were what they did?
To: kiryandil
I see what you did there.
28
posted on
01/17/2017 8:26:41 AM PST
by
ichabod1
(Make America Normal Again)
To: servo1969
county attorneys argued that it
was not clearly established in civil court at the time of the events in question that in situations such as Hardwicks, those involved had
the right to be free from deliberately fabricated evidence. Well there is now, thanks for that. The good news is that this ruling could make holding the social workers personally liable for the punitive damages originally awarded by the jury a reality. That would be sweet.
29
posted on
01/17/2017 8:41:18 AM PST
by
Valpal1
(I am enjoying the lamentations of their girly-men on social media.)
To: servo1969
I would’ve yelled, found them in contempt and had the Marshalls take them to jail.
To: TexasGator
It’s sad that bold letters where you don’t deem fit and therefore are offended is the only thing you got out of this post. Lying government workers taking someone’s kids is nothing compared to selectively bolding in a post.
31
posted on
01/17/2017 8:45:20 AM PST
by
Rusty0604
(bc)
To: Rusty0604
Your bold lead me to believe something that was not true.
To: TexasGator
Sorry you are so easily misled. I read it and had no trouble understanding that it was hypothetical.
33
posted on
01/17/2017 8:58:03 AM PST
by
Rusty0604
(bc)
To: Rusty0604
Then why did you NOT bold the part indicating it was a hypothetical?
To: servo1969
35
posted on
01/17/2017 9:01:21 AM PST
by
samtheman
(I hope someone close to Trump is reading a post somewhere in FR right now.)
To: TexasGator
I guess the poster just wanted to give it a little emphasis as to what kind of case this was..................
36
posted on
01/17/2017 9:02:01 AM PST
by
Red Badger
(If "Majority Rule" was so important in South Africa, why isn't it that way here?............)
To: servo1969
The code of ethics for attorneys states that when they sign on their name to a lawsuit, they are affirming that the issues are real and they believe the lawsuit has merit. (paraphrased, but you get the idea)
37
posted on
01/17/2017 9:07:44 AM PST
by
wildbill
(If you check behind the shower curtain for a slasher, and find one.... what's your plan?)
To: servo1969
That lawyer (Lin) should be disbarred for even making that argument.
The social workers in question should go to prison.
38
posted on
01/17/2017 9:13:25 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Big government is attractive to those who think that THEY will be in control of it.)
To: servo1969
They’re Democrats....lying is their default position!!!
39
posted on
01/17/2017 9:20:37 AM PST
by
ontap
To: catman67
What about I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth is unclear? In the case of leftists, the god before whom they think they are swearing is a bit iffy.
There is One who is takes notice all the same.
40
posted on
01/17/2017 9:52:10 AM PST
by
thulldud
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-46 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson