It’s a no-brainer to admit to that.
Currently it is.
Should it be? Aha, now that is the real question.
He was just asked again about Roe vs. Wade and again said it was “ensconced” in law and wouldn’t say he would have his solicitor general to testify against it (called it hypothetical). Why is our side always afraid to come out firmly on stuff? The Democrats don’t care. For goodness sake - abortion ends a human life.
What I would like someone to say is “yes, it is the law of the land. At one time, so was Jim Crow, so was segregation, so was whites/blacks only laws, so was Dredd Scott. However, over time and much bloodshed, these laws were deemed unjust and unconstitutional. Over the past few decades, over 60 million babies have been murdered by a segment of the medical and law industry more interested in making money then saving lives. As AG, I would follow the law but would work to get the law changed, just as I would any other unjust law.”