CNN has no evidence to support that assertion." Buy, but....what about the seriousness of the charge?
1 posted on
01/07/2017 3:26:22 PM PST by
blam
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
To: blam
This is CNN: Fake News retracted.
2 posted on
01/07/2017 3:28:57 PM PST by
Uncle Miltie
(Higher Taxes, Less Freedom, More Bureaucracy! What could possibly go wrong?)
To: blam
Is not “CNN” Arabic for “Fake News”?
3 posted on
01/07/2017 3:31:07 PM PST by
Da Coyote
To: blam
That’s a YUGE charge.
Show us the evidence or STFU.
Did they get an indictment from their version of a grand jury?
6 posted on
01/07/2017 3:34:28 PM PST by
dp0622
(The only thing an upper crust conservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
To: blam
7 posted on
01/07/2017 3:35:29 PM PST by
eaglestar
To: blam
That was quick/
Sue the lying mediots!
10 posted on
01/07/2017 3:37:59 PM PST by
Grampa Dave
(Obama shut your lying mouth and leave America! You are past your use by date! You stink!)
To: blam
Assange is currently wanted for extradition to Sweden - -
Last I heard, HE WAS NOT
To: blam
15 posted on
01/07/2017 3:45:51 PM PST by
blam
To: blam
Can’t un-ring a bell.
Pull their broadcast license and shut ‘em down.
Then sic the IRS on all their advertisers.
18 posted on
01/07/2017 3:50:29 PM PST by
Arm_Bears
(Rope. Tree. Politician/Journalist. Some assembly required.)
To: blam
“CNN said that it “regretted the error”
Hell I regret that CNN is still on TV.
19 posted on
01/07/2017 4:00:16 PM PST by
EXCH54FE
(Hurricane 416,Feisty Old Vet !!)
To: blam
“the women involved”
... were consenting adults, quibbling only over condom use. Assange wanted au natural, so they accused him of rape.
22 posted on
01/07/2017 4:17:50 PM PST by
ctdonath2
("If anyone will not listen to your words, shake the dust from your feet and leave them." - Jesus)
To: blam
Too late. Publication has already occurred. Sue them into poverty.
23 posted on
01/07/2017 4:20:33 PM PST by
SgtHooper
(If you remember the 60's, YOU WEREN'T THERE!)
To: blam
24 posted on
01/07/2017 4:21:18 PM PST by
ForYourChildren
(Christian Education [ RomanRoadsMedia.com - Classical Christian Approach to Homeschool ])
To: blam
A retraction is not good enough.
26 posted on
01/07/2017 4:31:29 PM PST by
Leep
(Stronger without her!)
To: blam
He should still sue them for slander, especially now that they’ve admitted to it. They would have a fairly ironclad case. If they can get a fair judge and or jury.
28 posted on
01/07/2017 4:35:30 PM PST by
Bullish
To: blam
30 posted on
01/07/2017 4:49:49 PM PST by
Secret Agent Man
( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
To: blam
This is The Democrat M. O.!
To: blam
Yes but who cares if CNN retractions. Gawker then and old that network. They need to learn with a HUGE penalty. Florida courts are familiar with this type of action.
34 posted on
01/07/2017 5:30:38 PM PST by
keving
(We get the government to vote)
To: blam
Error?
It’s character assassination. False accusation.
35 posted on
01/07/2017 5:54:22 PM PST by
Beowulf9
To: blam
We sincerely regret posting that extremely lucrative clickbait. We promise not to do it again until the next time we do it.
Signed,
Fake News, Inc.
36 posted on
01/07/2017 6:31:01 PM PST by
TChad
To: blam
Retractions are like saying, “I shouldn’t have shot you.”
37 posted on
01/07/2017 6:31:24 PM PST by
91B40
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-23 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson