Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: freeandfreezing
if you turn to page 16 of the unclassified version of the report, you can see that the whole section on RT's supposed biased reporting is from 2012.

RT's supposed biased reporting??

FYI...

Mikhail Lesin, co-founder of the Russian government-controlled news outlet "Russia Today" (RT), which the FR Putinistas often link to in their threads, was found dead in a Wash DC hotel in November of 2015.

Word is he had had a falling out with Putin and was about to become an informer, a 'snitch'. Putin's Russia is very much like the Mafia.

RT (Russia Today) and the other Moscow-controlled media outlets reported at the time that there were no signs of foul play--that he died of a heart attack.

However, when the autopsy report came out 5 months later (May 2016) it was revealed that he actually died as a result of blunt force trauma to his head and body.

_________________________________

MIKHAIL-LESIN-DIES

Mikhail Yuriyevich Lesin (July 11, 1958 – November 5, 2015) was a Russian political figure, media executive and an adviser to president Vladimir Putin.[1]

In 2006 he was awarded the Order "For Merit to the Fatherland", one of Russia's highest state decoration for civilians.

Mikhail Lesin was nicknamed the Bulldozer because of his ability to get virtually all Russian media outlets under The Kremlin's control.[2]--wikipedia
___________________________________

"RT [Russia Today] has been called a propaganda outlet for the Russian government[10][11][12] and its foreign policy[10][11][13][14] by former Russian officials[15] and by news reporters,[16] including former RT reporters.[17][18][19]

It has also been accused of spreading disinformation.[20][21][22]

The network states that it offers a 'Russian perspective' on global events.[24]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RT_%28TV_network%29
______________________________________

RT = RUSSIA TODAY

Nov 2015...

Vladimir Putin's media Svengali who was found dead in DC hotel was 'murdered for being an FBI informant'


______________________________________________________

" [RT (Russia Today) founder, Mikhail] Lesin was a central figure in the early Putin years, spearheading the Kremlin's effort to silence the country's independent television, the first step in the consolidation of authoritarian rule.

The first target was NTV, at that time Russia's largest and most popular independent TV channel, whose hard-hitting news broadcasts, talk shows, and satirical programs criticized the government over growing corruption and the war in Chechnya and gave airtime to the opposition.

In June 2000, a month after Putin's inauguration, NTV's founder and majority shareholder, Vladimir Gusinsky, was arrested and placed in Moscow's infamous Butyrka prison.

While he was there, the information minister made an offer: Gusinsky could have his freedom if he agreed to transfer his media holdings to Gazprom, the state-owned energy monopoly. ..."

http://www.worldaffairsjournal.org/blog/vladimir-kara-murza/ominous-return-putins-media-enforcer

22 posted on 01/06/2017 8:26:26 PM PST by ETL (On the road to America's recovery!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: ETL

I got that that RT is a propaganda arm of Russia. I also understand that the MSM here in the US operates the same way in producing the “Narrative.” I read stories in RT to gain an additional perspective, of which I can absorb into the mix, or reject just like any other source. All others should do the same.

OF course RT has an agenda...as well as any other publication.


34 posted on 01/06/2017 8:50:33 PM PST by abigkahuna (How can you be at two places at once when you are nowhere at all?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: ETL
You posted a lot of information about the death of an RT executive, and presumably are trying to show that RT, which is an acronym for Russia Today, is "biased" in that they report news with a particular slant.

So somehow our intelligence community feels the need to point out that media sources are "biased". Presumably they recognize that all news sources are "biased", and that pointing out that RT presents biased news is no more relevant than pointing out that the Washington Post, or the New York Times, or CNN, or the BBC, or for that matter Voice of America put a particular slant on what they report and their opinions.

And the same intelligence community devotes pages of their report on Russian "hacking" to showing, using recycled information from 2012, that RT is pro Russian, and against a lot of ideas -- including by the way the ideas of the people who voted for Trump.

And from that they allegedly concluded that Russia was trying to influence the election since they criticized Hillary Clinton more than Donald Trump.

I hope you can see that from an analysis point of view their methods appear to be amateur at best. A high school student who put forward articles from 2012 to support an argument that in 2016 some group took a particular course of action would get a D on their paper.

In this case the report deserves a "D", for Democratic Party propaganda.

54 posted on 01/07/2017 6:01:11 AM PST by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson