[freeandfreezing]

You posted a lot of information about the death of an RT executive, and presumably are trying to show that RT, which is an acronym for Russia Today, is "biased" in that they report news with a particular slant.

So somehow our intelligence community feels the need to point out that media sources are "biased". Presumably they recognize that all news sources are "biased", and that pointing out that RT presents biased news is no more relevant than pointing out that the Washington Post, or the New York Times, or CNN, or the BBC, or for that matter Voice of America put a particular slant on what they report and their opinions.

And the same intelligence community devotes pages of their report on Russian "hacking" to showing, using recycled information from 2012, that RT is pro Russian, and against a lot of ideas -- including by the way the ideas of the people who voted for Trump.

And from that they allegedly concluded that Russia was trying to influence the election since they criticized Hillary Clinton more than Donald Trump.

I hope you can see that from an analysis point of view their methods appear to be amateur at best. A high school student who put forward articles from 2012 to support an argument that in 2016 some group took a particular course of action would get a D on their paper.

In this case the report deserves a "D", for Democratic Party propaganda.

[ETL]

You posted a lot of information about the death of an RT executive, and presumably are trying to show that RT, which is an acronym for Russia Today, is "biased" in that they report news with a particular slant.

Lol! Thanks! That's pretty funny. Do you have a background in comedy?