Posted on 01/04/2017 8:04:46 AM PST by Kaslin
Is HilLIARy a closet lesbian? The internet is about with questions. 24/7 coverage starting now!
If you’re a liberal, speculation against Trump is “fact”
In a word, NO.
Moving right along...
When news and moron talking heads drive policy, it's time to ignore them as irrelevant.
When a useless social segment is determined to commit suicide, why not let them?
Well, liberal and “conservative” news sources spent the past 12 months filling their pages with stories about how the GOP was going to fall apart because of Trump’s nomination, and what a Hillary presidency was going to look like. That turned out to be a giant waste of space. Now they have moved on to fill their pages with stories about how horrible Trump is going to be, or how he is going to either be a conservative, racist, sexist ogre (liberal media) or a closet liberal who will stab conservatives in the back (Never Trump media). That is going to be a waste of space too. Is it any wonder why people have stopped reading these sources for the most part?
In the days of George W. (Aw, gee, Biff) McFly, “Analysis” (OPINION) headline “news” was the norm.
For the Fraud, Big Media left off the “analysis” and simply printed all the lies they wanted to as headline “news”.
I do not think speculation or predictions are “news.” It is simply space-filler. I have long been annoyed by this.
It is one thing for a FR post to speculate about the future. We are a discussion forum. It is something else again - something untrue - to pretend that any “report” of things that haven’t happened is “news.”
YOU LOST!
DEAL WITH IT!
The MSM considers a lot of things to be news... things like speculation, myth, junk science, I mean look at the whole schtiick about global warming!
Let's face it the actual "news" of any given day could be covered, at length, in a 90 minute broadcast. In fact, that's how it was done for decades, but only from one point of view. Thus, well over 90% of what the MSM broadcasts now is speculation, prediction, opinion, editorializing, fluff, filler and entertainment and downright lying in its passion for 24/7 "news" broadcasting. I like how most of the talking heads call what they do "opinion journalism". Ha - that's a oxymoron if I've ever heard one.
“I mean look at the whole schtiick about global warming!”
Now it’s all about “climate change” and Hussein-worshippers bashing the “fools” who don’t believe it happens (without leftist freaks acknowledging the requirement that we believe that WE cause it).
Can News Be Defined as Speculation? YES!
.... Apparently the answer is Yes since the Media is handling the Russian "Hacking" of the election as actual fact.
It always has been by the New York Times.
They make speculation into news by reporting that an “expert” said it. The hard “news” is that the expert said it. By extension, reporters can just quote each other, or a reporter can even just quote himself, and it’s news. Just the facts.
“Can Speculation Be Defined as News?”
Not without a live chicken and a Rabbi
Only when it supports a Democrat narrative. Then it’s headlines.
It's not going to be any of those people.
Or if it is, it's going to be a very dull year.
“Can Speculation Be Defined as News?”
Can the Gospel of Obama be treated as truthful?
Nope n Nope ....
Come on Jan. 21st !!!!
First, I would suggest that Rachel Maddow actually study a bit of history and learn a little about Hitler. Substitute "conservative" for "Jew" in modern liberal rhetoric, and you have something pretty close to the Nazi rhetoric of the 1930s and 40s. The Nazi party platform was not that different from the current Democrat party platform.
Second, Rachel is partially correct: the liberal practice of intimidating, threatening, assaulting people and damaging or destroying property of anyone who disagrees with the liberal agenda is eerily similar to the actions of Nazi brownshirts who used such tactics to cement Nazi power.
Watch out for Democrat projection: since they always project what they themselves plan or think, and their projections are becoming more violent, there is strong reason to be concerned. Very concerned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.