Posted on 12/28/2016 11:05:42 AM PST by Rockitz
When the East Anglia Climate Research Unit was hacked, the recovered emails pretty much set the standard on how to “fiddle” with the data. Stick different data sets together with no regard to how well they actually conform. Leave inconvenient data sets out, like the “entire Medieval Warming Period” (They tried to claim it was local to Europe!). Actually its no different then what I remember seeing students do when I was a TA. You get “behind” the lab is due, you kind of know what the lab TA wants to see, you know what the desired error needs to be. So “presto Ali-Ka-Zaam!” data “appears” you hand your lab in and crisis averted!
And Truth in Advertising: I admit I did this too a time or two way back when, when time was running out and the lab molecules or signals weren’t cooperating.
And I remembered that when grading those lab reports.(as long as it wasn’t a habit!)
I think we had only 4 elements then - earth, fire, air & water!
If the data doesn’t fit the theory, lie about the data.
I reject the entire notion that people can determine the average temperature of the entire planet to within one one/hundredth of one degree in the first place. I live by a large stream which is called a creek but is more of a small river. I don’t fish any longer but I used to go fishing almost daily and when traveling the winding curves of the creek late in the day in a boat it was amazing to feel the temperature of the air change every time you turned a corner, it was quite noticeable, sometimes changing from very comfortably warm to chilly within a few feet. To think that people can take temp measurements in a very few locations and then come up with an average temperature for the Earth just seems illogical, in fact silly in my view. To claim acccuracy to one one hundredth of one degree F is, I believe, absurd.
No kidding there.
Take the Siberian stations offline and move the US ones to parking lots, basically...and take many of them offline...seriously?
Biggest scam of our generation, or maybe three.
Mrs. Infool7 and I experienced the same phenomenon on the Fox river here in Illinois, this very November. It wasn’t hot but certainly the most warm and comfortable November I can recall.
I wonder much CMEs actually affect the earth’s temperature. My research so far has only uncovered studies that completely dismiss any CME heating whatsoever.
Little boy; let the emperor enjoy his new clothes.
His subjects sure do!
No; just the 'name' of the Federal Agency and ABOLISH it!
This has worked since the dawn of man...
Democrats are liars - from the lowest violent thug to the highest college crybully... This is not a surprise.
Chicago O'Hare airport (Orchard Field) , 1940's
O'Hare field in the early 60's
O'Hare Field today
1950's aircraft
1970's aircraft
Todays aircraft
Traffic at O'Hare
Airline Operations
(Takeoffs Plus Landings)
Midway . Ohare
1958
337,421 66,205
1959
345,170 82,417
1960
298,582 163,351
1961
187,978 235,908
1962
46,873 331,090
1963
19,054 358,266
1964
19,017 389,640
1965
16,716 443,026
1966
5,090 478,644
1967
4,427 573,506
1968
26,941 628,632
1969
31,394 632,030
1970
43,553 598,973
1971
51,734 565,826
2015
Passengers 76,949,336
Aircraft operations 875,136
Any home-schooled high school kid knows that if you compare current temps with 100-year old temps, YOU MUST use exactly, precisely, the same methodology as that used 100 years ago. Especially when speaking of temps measured in 100ths of degrees.
This is NOT being done.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.