Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

India Overtakes Britain as the World’s Sixth-Largest Economy
Foreign Policy ^ | 12/20/2016 | Robbie Gramer

Posted on 12/20/2016 9:26:35 PM PST by libh8er

Score one for the post-colonial underdog. India’s economy has reportedly overtaken the United Kingdom’s for the first time in over 100 years, now standing as the world’s sixth-largest economy by GDP after the United States, China, Japan, Germany, and France. The milestone is a symbol of India’s rapid economic growth and, conversely, the U.K.’s post-Brexit slump.

Economically, it’s been a banner year for India. In February, it surpassed China as the world’s fastest-growing economy. And in October, the International Monetary Fund predicted India would retain that title for the foreseeable future; its GDP is projected to increase by 7.6 percent through 2017.

“India may have a large population base but this is a big leap,” Kiren Rijiju, India’s minister of state for home affairs, said of the news earlier this week.

India’s former colonial ruler, the United Kingdom, is projected to grow by only 1.8 percent in 2016 and 1.1 percent in 2017. Since it voted to leave the European Union in June, which could entail leaving the EU’s lucrative common market, Britain’s economy and currency have struggled.

(Excerpt) Read more at foreignpolicy.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: india
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last
To: DrPretorius

The author seems much more scholarly and researched and believable than your rambling post without a shred of evidence.


41 posted on 12/21/2016 11:45:12 AM PST by entropy12 (Officially POTUS on Dec 19th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: zeestephen

Correct you are. India has NEVER invaded or bombed another country in it’s 5000 year history. Which simply means it is not an aggressive power. Now with its 7+% annual growth rate of GDP, it does have the capability to defend itself without needed umbrella defense pacts such as NATO.


42 posted on 12/21/2016 11:49:23 AM PST by entropy12 (Officially POTUS on Dec 19th!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: entropy12
India had the world’s largest economy during the years 1 AD and 1000 AD.

Keep in mind though, during that time period "India" was little more than a geographic expression. See Middle kingdoms of India.

43 posted on 12/21/2016 2:27:06 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“The author seems much more scholarly and researched and believable than your rambling post without a shred of evidence.”

Hello, sucker.

“There’s a sucker born every minute.” - PT Barnum


44 posted on 12/21/2016 5:09:10 PM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

“The author seems much more scholarly and researched and believable than your rambling post without a shred of evidence.”

Hello, sucker.

“There’s a sucker born every minute.” - PT Barnum


45 posted on 12/21/2016 5:09:13 PM PST by DrPretorius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: libh8er; HiTech RedNeck

2.3% - yet that’s about 30 million :)


46 posted on 12/22/2016 2:28:40 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hammer
The UK was a poor country until the start of the 1700s. With the Industrial revolution it pulled ahead.

It took over overlordship of various Indian nations in the 1800s which is why from 1853 it overtook India economically.

Then from 1947 India implemented Socialism which kept it down -- THAT's the key reason why India is still poor. It dismantled socialism in 1991 and has been growing steadily and rapidly since then

So the answer to your question is that socialism sucks -- it kept India down and it stagnated the UK from '47 onwards (and still does). Why did Obama want to implement a failed policy in the USA?

47 posted on 12/22/2016 2:40:56 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RockyTx

actually the removal of the two larger notes seems to have a deflationary effect.


48 posted on 12/22/2016 2:42:33 AM PST by Cronos (Obama's dislike of Assad is not based on his brutality but that he isn't a jihadi Moslem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

Are they saying it’s not a third world country. Truly shocking, if true!


49 posted on 12/22/2016 2:43:27 AM PST by BunnySlippers (I Love Bull Markets!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-49 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson