Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Starting in 2019, if Your Film Isn’t Diverse, It Won’t Be Eligible for a BAFTA Award
Slate ^

Posted on 12/20/2016 7:28:21 PM PST by TigerClaws

In an incredibly bold move, the British Academy of Film and Television Arts announced last week that, beginning in 2019, works that do not demonstrate inclusivity in their production practices will no longer be eligible for the Outstanding British Film or Outstanding Debut by a British Writer, Director, or Producer awards at the annual BAFTAs, often considered the U.K. equivalent of the Oscars.* Eligible projects must showcase this in two of the following ways, as the BBC reported: On-screen characters and themes, senior roles and crew, industry training and career progression, and audience access and appeal to underrepresented audiences. BAFTA will also remove the requirement that newly admitted voters be recommended by two existing members.

Back in 2014, the British Film Institute established similar standards for projects seeking National Lottery funding in an effort to improve representation within the filmmaking industry. BAFTA's decision is particularly striking, however, when you hold it up against its American counterpart, the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences, which, of course, faced an embarrassing PR backlash with the #OscarsSoWhite campaign this year. Not long after the Oscar nominations revealed, for the second year in a row, a slate of all-white acting nominees, the academy announced that it was changing its membership rules in an effort to address the issue. This included shortening members’ voting statuses to 10 years (able to reactivated so long as they remain active within the industry) and adding three more governors' seats filled by people from underrepresented groups.

(Excerpt) Read more at slate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: bafta; film; uk; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 12/20/2016 7:28:21 PM PST by TigerClaws
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

And?

So?


2 posted on 12/20/2016 7:29:18 PM PST by ButThreeLeftsDo (MAGA!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

More liberal extortion.


3 posted on 12/20/2016 7:30:17 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

anyone who makes films for awards....


4 posted on 12/20/2016 7:31:00 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

You talk about chicken shtt


5 posted on 12/20/2016 7:32:18 PM PST by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Even chickens look down on this. It’s worse than chickenshit.


6 posted on 12/20/2016 7:33:40 PM PST by NorthMountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Gone with the Wind was diverse . . .


7 posted on 12/20/2016 7:35:04 PM PST by Dalberg-Acton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

BAFTA? Bureau of Arrogant Friggin Tittybaby A-holes?


8 posted on 12/20/2016 7:36:16 PM PST by patro (Phrogs Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

I guess period pieces are automatically not eligible?


9 posted on 12/20/2016 7:36:33 PM PST by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Who cares?


10 posted on 12/20/2016 7:37:31 PM PST by stocksthatgoup (Where's Hillary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Movie houses are gonna have a lot of popcorn and Jujubes left over.


11 posted on 12/20/2016 7:42:48 PM PST by moovova
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Looks like a lot of these miffed organizations are going to get elbowed off into irrelevance. The world is at a cultural tipping point of enough-too-much-leftiness.


12 posted on 12/20/2016 7:43:06 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

You’re not going to need the awards when you’ve killed movies


13 posted on 12/20/2016 7:43:09 PM PST by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41
Only if you make Queen Elizabeth I a coal black lesbian, who speaks with an Indian accent, Alfred the Great has to be a Muslim Paki, Winston Churchill as a skinny, queer, on welfare Egyptian, and on and on and on like that, I guess.

The BEEB has absolutely RUINED almost EVERY SINGLE Shakespearean play, now, by casting blacks in MAJOR roles, where they do NOT belong at all!

14 posted on 12/20/2016 7:44:47 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: stocksthatgoup
You should!

Hollyweird and T.V. shows made here, have done the same damned thing and have already picked the OSCAR winners according to race, queerness, transgender, etc.!

15 posted on 12/20/2016 7:46:26 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: butlerweave

They’ll still give out awards; especially for highly praised FLOPS that the vast majority of people have less than no desire to see; sadly.


16 posted on 12/20/2016 7:47:22 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

According to whom?


17 posted on 12/20/2016 7:49:26 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigerClaws

Contrary to certain people’s imaginations, I actually go whole days without running into Blacks and homosexuals.

Some days I do run into them. That’s life. It is as it should be.

Movies can depict real life without swapping out male roles, and packing the cast with tokens.

Shame on these racists.


18 posted on 12/20/2016 7:54:37 PM PST by DoughtyOne (jcon40, "Are we be coming into the age of Sanity?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

It depends on the period.


19 posted on 12/20/2016 7:56:04 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: nopardons

I might be wrong, but I think Shakespeare transcends race. A black actor in a Shakespeare play doesn’t bother me too much at all. After all, all the female roles were played by boys/young men back in the day.

But in depicting actual historic events, putting blacks where they weren’t is just falsifying reality for political correctness. I doubt there were many blacks at the Battle of Runnymede.


20 posted on 12/20/2016 8:01:52 PM PST by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson