...and this is considered exploring and progress. The left is a disease.
Ick.
From about 1969 to 1977...I read Nat’l Geographic with passion. It was a great educational tool. I had a subscription later in life from the late 1980s to 1994. At the Nov 94 point where they had the entire issue devoted to Global Warming....I gave up and cancelled the magazine. I won’t touch today.
Kinda sad. It was a five-star magazine at one point.
Another example leftism is truly a mental disorder.
Baloney....You don't have to prance around if you're happy.
Same thing with this "child".
Years ago, watching science fiction magazines and newspapers of various sorts come and go, I identified a process I called “roll hard left and die.”
When a magazine or a newspaper or any news or entertainment media was in real trouble, they went hard, hard left, then died.
It took me a little while to realize this was a sane strategy. In a field completely controlled by the left, when you knew that your job was in peril be it through missmanagement or whatever, your last hope was to go incredibly hard left, so you could blame the failure on ideology. And instead of not being able to find a job, you found yourself lionized by all the “right” (left) “thinking people.” New jobs were assured.
https://accordingtohoyt.com/2016/11/19/rolling-in-the-deep/
NatGeo used to be such a wonderful magazine. I honestly wonder about demonic possession driving the actions of the left. It’s as if their script for everything they do was written in hell and derived from the mind of madness and chaos.
What does this mental illness and derangement have to do with photos of foreign lands that this magazine was founded upon ?
This is child abuse. Parents pushing their children into this to be cool.
More like they just EMBARRASSED themselves big time. MORONS!
I dropped their magazine after having receiving it for 40 years and told them the same. I grew up reading these magazines over and over until the covers were bent.
Pathetic and what a lose to children of all ages. I hope something comes along to replace it.
Aaaaand that’s why I’ve been boycotting that rag for the past few years.
I’ll read the old stuff from before 2003, but I wont touch anything they print today.
That is child abuse to promote this crap at that age. They should be ashamed.
Glad I cancelled my subscription a few years ago. They did an article around 10 years ago about Earnest Shackelton that was amazing, after that they went downhill.
(Link to the full-length Free Republic thread)
The next National Geographic cover will feature a quote from Jillpup which echoes the messages that have been central to his advocacy since he began: that he’s always been sure of his species and that he loves who he is.
“The best thing about being a puppy is, now I don’t have to pretend to be a person,” the quote reads. The story elaborates, “Mom was thrilled the first time I showed my doggie side. Dad took a little longer, even said I was barking up the wrong tree. Mom threatened to ‘cut him off’ whatever that meant, so he immediately took me out to play fetch and chase parked cars. Once he started taking me hunting and saw that I could retrieve waterfowl, Dad adjusted to it. I like controlling my parents and demanding all of their attention.”
I notice there are no fat people on the cover. Are they fat-o-phobes?
Appearance is fleeting and superficial. Every one of these snowflakes has xx or xy chromosomes that define their biology independent of any external perception. How they look and act has no bearing on their “gender.”