He has no shame and has aligned himself with the enemies of humanity and, in doing so, has evoked the wrath of God.
Still doing the democrats’ work for them.
What a self righteous prig!
are clearly contrary to the Supreme Court of the United States’ current rulings on abortion. >>>>>>>>>>>>
No kidding !
Ohio’s weaselly , blivovating village idiot governor has sided with baby murder.
Just instate free birth control in Ohio and then STOP the baby killing.
>>>“As governor I have worked hard... “
And this relates to working smart?
I’m sure he’s right that implementation of the bill would instantly be blocked by Federal courts, but he should have signed it anyway.
He’s a real peach of a guy. So glad he thinks he is relevant in national politics. /s/
Ah, but he’s holding to Conservative principles. He told us so, many times. The son of a postman wouldn’t lie.
But a politician lies, repeatedly.
This bonehead Gov of Ohio always talks a big game about life and his relationship with Christ.At the end of the day he is just the typical politician afraid to stand up for what is right . I hope the good people of Ohio wake up and put this guy on the unemployment line next round.
Well the people of Ohio can veto his job.
Because obviously there is no heartbeat detected in him.
He vetoed the bill AT THE REQUEST OF OHIO RIGHT TO LIFE.
Go to their site to read the reasoning.
[As governor I have worked hard to strengthen Ohio’s protections for the sanctity of human life, and I have deep respect for my fellow members of the pro-life community and their ongoing efforts in defense of unborn life.]
JOHN KASICH - “Man of his word.” /s
RINOcrat John Kasich is a lying murdering traitor.
Kasich, you were such a loser for not supporting your party nominee...Now you have added hell bound loser because of your veto of this bill...Thank God the people of America saw thru you. Goodbye and good riddence an I hope the lovely people of ohio..vote you out on your keester in next gubernatorial election.
There are some, even here, who think this pig was a worthy candidate for potus.
Kasich was really trying to say that “we don’t need American babies because I support bringing in as many illegal alien babies and anchor babies as possible.”
If there was a chance in hell of a single baby actually being saved by the “heartbeat” bill, I’d be as upset about this as the other commentors here.
Although interestingly, a “heartbeat” bill is seen by the strict pro-life community as a fatal compromise that sacrifices hundreds of thousands of lives on the alter of “reasonableness”. It would in fact be possible that a heartbeat bill, even if it miraculously passed supreme court muster, would save NO babies, because every woman could still get their abortion they wanted before the 6 week deadline.
So it is absurd to argue that it is a sell-out to support 20-week ban but not 6-week ban, unless you also will admit that it is a sellout doing a 6-week ban instead of an implantation ban.
(which btw is still considered an outrage by the part of the pro-life community who argues for a fertilization ban, meaning a ban on doing anything to end the life of a fertilized egg. This is the most strictly pro-life position, (well I guess those who argue that preventing a sperm and an egg from interacting is a form of abortion are “stricter”) although it is nearly impossible to actually control legally, as you would NEVER know that an egg got fertilized but then didn’t get implanted. (note that a firm anti-death-to-fertilized-eggs position would shut down IVF, since you would be required to implant every fertilized egg or be accused of murder).
Anyway, from a strategic viewpoint, and looking at this like a war, Kasich is correct. the 6-week bill is like having a soldier take off his clothes and march toward the enemy with a grenade, in the theoretical possibility that he will make it to the camp and kill the leader. When in fact, we know he’ll just be shot dead, and we’ll have one less soldier.
A certain-to-lose fight over a heartbeat bill will waste money. And it isn’t saying that a life is worth money, because the money spent won’t save a life, it will actually enrich our opponents.
No point really in passing a bill that will do nothing more than transfer tax dollars to the pro-abortion side.
That’s the “practical” argument. The ethical argument would be “we pass the bill because it is right, even though the courts are wrong”. Except as I pointed out above, “heartbeat” is not the “right” bill, a full ban is the “right” thing to do. Which we don’t pass because we know it will get rejected, just like we know this heartbeat bill will be rejected.
But that wasn't in the headline. Why not? The headline is dishonest.