We Will.
Posted on 12/15/2016 1:39:32 PM PST by DeweyCA
Facebook had announced it will begin adding warning labels to “fake news” on its site. The plan is to add a link to stories which readers have identified as fake. The link will cite fact-checkers explaining why a story is false or fake. Facebook described the proposed changes in a blog post:
"We believe in giving people a voice and that we cannot become arbiters of truth ourselves, so we’re approaching this problem carefully. We’ve focused our efforts on the worst of the worst, on the clear hoaxes spread by spammers for their own gain, and on engaging both our community and third party organizations…
"We’re testing several ways to make it easier to report a hoax if you see one on Facebook, which you can do by clicking the upper right hand corner of a post. We’ve relied heavily on our community for help on this issue, and this can help us detect more fake news.
"We’ve started a program to work with third-party fact checking organizations that are signatories of Poynter’s International Fact Checking Code of Principles. We’ll use the reports from our community, along with other signals, to send stories to these organizations. If the fact checking organizations identify a story as fake, it will get flagged as disputed and there will be a link to the corresponding article explaining why. Stories that have been disputed may also appear lower in News Feed."
Cue the outrage mobs targeting stories or websites they don’t like as “fake news.” But Facebook users’ reporting of “fake news” will be backed up by the expertise of fact-checkers. Clicking over to Poynter’s list of signatories you find the fact-checkers Facebook will rely on in the U.S. are ABC News, the AP, FactCheck.org, the Washington Post, Snopes and Politifact.
There certainly is a lot of junk on Facebook that I wouldn’t defend and won’t miss. That said, the idea of Snopes and Politifact controlling the distribution of news online seems like a truly terrible idea. Just to take one significant example of why it’s a bad idea, here’s how Politifact rated Obama’s statements ‘If you like your plan you can keep it’ between 2008 and 2013.
2008: True
politifact-2008
2009: Half-true
politifact-2009
2012: Half-true
politifact-2012
2013: Lie of the Year
politifact-2013
There are a couple points to make about this sequence. The first is that it’s not just tinfoil hat conspiracy theories from fringe websites that are going to be impacted by Facebook’s decision to put a scarlet letter on certain news stories. It’s also major stories that are central to our political debate, like the one above. This was President Obama’s go-to sales line for his signature achievement in office.
The second point here is that fact-checkers get it wrong sometimes. Not only was “If you like your plan…” important to the national debate it was also hard to pin down because of the grand scope of the change being instituted. Obamacare was complex enough (and far off enough) that it was possible to argue Obama was right…until it became clear he wasn’t.
Third point: Sometimes the experts are also partisans who have an agenda. That was certainly the case with regard to Obamacare. Health care wonks like Ezra Klein and Jonathan Gruber knew a great deal about the program. They were also prepared to help their Democratic allies in government lie to the public if necessary to see it succeed. It’s not that they didn’t know the truth it’s just that they weren’t going to share all of it (except occasionally to a friendly audience).
Now imagine applying these new rules retroactively to this story. Would any story which challenged Obama’s statement be flagged as “fake news” prior to 2013? And not only flagged, it seems Facebook would discourage people from sharing it and some algorithm would ensure it appeared lower in the news rankings. The bottom line is that a “fake news” designation could suppress stories that later turn out to be true, possibly even for years. This is just one example but it’s a pivotal one.
Maybe Facebook will clear out a bunch of “fake news” with this new process but it’s also very likely going to taint and hamper some important (and true) news stories. Fact-checkers do miss the mark sometimes and experts aren’t always completely straight with the public. But what’s really worrisome is that this new dynamic creates fresh opportunity for unscrupulous politicians who are good at controversializing stories they want to go away. It also could help in the creation of media echo chambers designed to support certain policies. Has Facebook thought through any of this? It’s not clear that they have.
No problem. I see lots of people on Facebook now going around to the stories from ABC, NBC, CNN labeling them FAKE NEWS in the comments. We all can play this game.
Understand what is happening folks.
ANYTHING not approved by MediaMatters.Soros will now be considered as “Fake News”.
What could possibly go wrong?
Every liberal is a totalitarian thug.
The President has no say over such a policy implemented by a private company, nor should he.
The news media, hollywood, and big, leftist companies like google and facebook will switch their efforts to de-legitimize Trump into overdrive following January 20th. He'll just have to deal with it like every conservative president for the past several decades.
Prediction:
This will roll out and be active for about 6 months.
The backlash will be so phenomenal that Facebook will pull the plug.
Ohh, this will be fun!
We will be able to test their sincerity when they start labeling the Russian hacking business as fake.
We all need to claim “fake media” on every msm article here, Twitter, and fb.
Honestly, unless there are links to raw documents, I don’t trust any web site for their “unbiased reporting”.
On the left fringe you have WaPo and their ridiculous “fake News / Russia” garbage, on the right you have #pizzagate.
I haven’t dug deeply in either one because within 5 minutes of research, you can easily point how they are both so speculative, and have no hard evidence.
Who will FACT CHECK the FACT CHECKERS ?
Liberals LOVE censorship because their ideas are so easy to show as bullsh*t.
Liberals are the most greedy, fascist, hate-filled, mean-spirited, envious, resentful, vicious, close-minded, violent, murdering, child-abusing, amoral, stupid, censoring, horse-punching, book-burning, ignorant, uneducated, unskilled, childish, prejudiced, racist, women-hating, man-hating, perverted, thieving, destructive, American-hating, Christian-hating, muslim-loving, communist, vote-rigging, vulgar, dirty, smelly, election-rejecting, regressive, restrictive, prohibitive, bed-wetting, poo-flinging, cop-killing, and scared little lying thumb-sucking idiots God has ever created.
We Will.
Get the popcorn ready.
They’re going to label something ‘fake news’ and then get sued for defamation.
And the opposite too: they’re going to miss labeling a story about some quack cure as ‘fake’ and get sued by someone who believed it.
Soon Facebook will be as unreliable as the news they’re trying to control.
There is more than slant though. Sure leftists fact-checkers will too often label something that is spot-on as wrong because it violates their PC world view. But just because something is conservative leaning it doesn’t make me want to read it. There is some BS out there by click bait scammers that cater to conservatives as well all other kinds of audiences.
I hope they start labelling POLLS as fake news.
If a pollster asks a silly question, then posts AS NEWS the collective answer to the silly question, then that’s BS. They aren’t reporting news. They are creating a little story and reporting the results as news.
WARNING! The following companies only produce fake news:
CBS
NBC
ABC
Could lead to some juicy lawsuits,too
You label my news as fake and I can prove it...Sweetie,we have billion dollar lawsuit for SLANDER..After all,it was YOUR FACT CHECKERS who said my news was fake...There is malice if your checkers are liberal and my news is pro life,pro conservative or pro Trump...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.