To: Steve_Seattle
You label my news as fake and I can prove it...Sweetie,we have billion dollar lawsuit for SLANDER..After all,it was YOUR FACT CHECKERS who said my news was fake...There is malice if your checkers are liberal and my news is pro life,pro conservative or pro Trump...
To: Hambone 1934
"You label my news as fake and I can prove it...Sweetie,we have billion dollar lawsuit for SLANDER..After all,it was YOUR FACT CHECKERS who said my news was fake...There is malice if your checkers are liberal and my news is pro life,pro conservative or pro Trump..."
I'm not a lawyer, so I don't know what would and wouldn't fly from a legal standpoint, but I would not think they would be operating in good faith by allowing any viewer to label something as "fake" with no proof whatsoever, and with no review, especially if the disseminator of the information could PROVE that it was true.
Apart from First Amendment considerations, there also might be a racketeering angle, if the policy could be shown to be an effort to shut down competing businesses via malicious harassment.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson