Posted on 12/13/2016 8:07:51 AM PST by bobsunshine
And Hillary still lost. Her campaign waaaay underestimated the number of fraudulent votes she needed to win. Which of course means Trump probably won by the greatest landslide in history.
I read that on of the boxes had an unopened seal and had registered 306 votes, most for Hillary. When they removed the seal and looked in the box, there were about 50 voting receipts.
I guess they need to shut down those funeral home voter registration offices.
The dems might regret these recount demands.
They were in Pennsylvania, turned out in droves! Some in Ohio, too!
And Hillary still lost. Her campaign waaaay underestimated the number of fraudulent votes she needed to win. Which of course means Trump probably won by the greatest landslide in history.
And not a soul will go to prison.
This is a tricky conspiracy to figure out when you assume the left is always devilishly clever.
It's kind of like they shot themselves in the foot. Usually they can accuse us of the very things they are doing and get away with it.
6 votes for the price of one
Just insert that ballot multiple times
The Amish know good value for their effort
How hard would it be to compile a list of Registered Voters and sort it by Address?? In California it is ILLEGAL!
When you find multiple addresses that don’t exist and have dozens or hundreds of Registered Voters at those nonexistent addresses, or 40 voters Registered to a 1 bedroom apartment, there might be Voter Fraud going on.
If such a list was AVAILABLE all of this nonsense would end immediately and everyone would know how rampant Vote Fraud really is, especially here in California
1. I 100% believe that election fraud favors the Democrats.
2. If I had to bet, I would bet that over 90% (probably closer to 99%) of election fraud favors the Democrats. (I don’t believe that there is never fraud that favors Republicans, but I’m confident it is quite rare by comparison.)
3. That said, I would have to have better data to say much about the 37% figure. What if, in 37% of precincts there was 1 extra vote. Hardly massive fraud. What if, in another 37% of precincts, there were too few votes? There was not enough data in the article to draw any reasonable conclusions.
I can, however, draw conclusions about past election recounts. The recounts like we had with Franken and Gregoire are statistically improbable. That so many other disputed elections would go to the Democrat with such a lopsided frequency indicates fraud in the recount process.
“If such a list was AVAILABLE all of this nonsense would end immediately and everyone would know how rampant Vote Fraud really is, especially here in California”
Time to penalize a state if it enables fraud. Reduce the number of electoral votes by a new formula. PASS new laws at the federal level to inhibit these states that do this.
I’m starting to feel sorry for the russians.
For conservatives, the Hillary 2016 campaign is the gift that keeps on giving.
Why do you think the democrats are fighting tooth and nail against voter ID? Never mind, it was a rhetorical question.
Vlad forced them to recount and exposed their printing press. You evil genius.
Pray America woke
“If such a list was AVAILABLE all of this nonsense would end immediately and everyone would know how rampant Vote Fraud really is, especially here in California.”
My guess is it’s going to be developed, courtesy of the new DOJ.
I’d REALLLLLYYY love to see such an audit into LA, SF and Alameda Counties in California. Cali’s voter participation was shown to increase by 8.2% over 2012. I’m not buying that BS for a second. That 4.3 million vote advantage for Clinton seems way out of proportion, even in that state.
When no one was looking they scanned a few more ballots through the machines.
Easy.
There are some inner city precincts where there are no actual Republican election judges or poll watchers. These are often high crime areas. I have long thought how easy it would be for the two chief judges, both of whom are Democrats though one signed (legitimately) the Republican line, to just vote again and again after the polls closed. That's my theory on why Dem cities so often report hours after the rest of the state. They wait to find out how many additional votes will be needed.
When Philadelphia reported before many Republican leaning areas of Pennsylvania, I had real hope that Trummp would win. Perhaps there were Republican workers/watchers in most Philadelphia precincts. There is no need to report late if you are being watched for cheating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.