Posted on 12/08/2016 1:56:12 PM PST by JOHN ADAMS
Brietbart had an article about this speech, here http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/07/obama-urges-soldiers-to-question-trumps-authority-criticize-our-president/ I read it and thought maybe they were being hyperbolic about what Obama had said. So I forced myself to read the speech. They weren't being hyperbolic. Herewith the important excerpts, with my translation in CAPS.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2016/12/06/remarks-president-administrations-approach-counterterrorism
We have to avoid repeating the mistakes of the 2003 invasion that have helped to give rise to the organization that became ISIL in the first place. LETS REMEMBER ONE OF MY FAVORITE LINES FROM THE FIRST SEVEN YEARS OF MY PRESIDENCY: ITS ALL GEORGE BUSHS FAULT.
No foreign terrorist organization has successfully planned and executed an attack on our homeland. THIS DEPENDS ON WHAT YOU MEAN BY FOREIGN AND WHAT YOU MEAN BY ORGANIZATION
We will not achieve the kind of clearly defined victory comparable to those that we won in previous wars against nations. We wont have a scene of the Emperor of Japan and Douglas MacArthur in a surrender. And the reason we wont have that is because technology makes it impossible to completely shield impressionable minds from violent ideologies. And somebody who is trying to kill and willing to be killed is dangerous, particularly when we live in a country where its very easy for that person to buy a very powerful weapon. DONT EXPECT AN ACTUAL VICTORY OVER OUR ENEMIES. I NEVER USE THE WORD "VICTORY," BECAUSE I DON'T BELIEVE THERE CAN BE SUCH A THING. IF YOURE UNHAPPY ABOUT THE FACT THERE WILL BE NO VICTORY OVER PEOPLE WHO WANT TO KILL US ALL OR SUBJUGATE US, BLAME THE SECOND AMENDMENT, NOT ME, FOR YOUR LACK OF SAFETY.
So rather than offer false promises that we can eliminate terrorism by dropping more bombs, or deploying more and more troops, or fencing ourselves off from the rest of the world, we have to take a long view of the terrorist threat, and we have to pursue a smart strategy that can be sustained. YOULL JUST HAVE TO LEARN HOW TO TOLERATE LIVING IN A WORLD WHERE TERRORISTS BLOW STUFF UP AND MURDER PEOPLE AT RANDOM INTERVALS, THE BEST SOLUTION FOR ALL OF YOU IS TO HOPE THAT THE PEOPLE WHO GET KILLED ARE IN SOME CITY OTHER THAN YOURS AND ARENT RELATED OR KNOWN TO YOU. I, OF COURSE, WILL HAVE SECRET SERVICE PROTECTION, SO I PERSONALLY WONT HAVE ANYTHING TO WORRY ABOUT.
In the time remaining, let me suggest what I think should guide this approach. First of all, a sustainable counterterrorism strategy depends on keeping the threat in perspective. The terrorist threat is real and it is dangerous. But these terrorists want to cast themselves as the vanguard of a new world order. They are not. They are thugs and they are murderers, and they should be treated that way. Fascism threatened to overrun the entire world -- and we had to wage total war in response. Communism threatened not only to overturn a world order, but threatened nuclear holocaust -- so we had to build armaments and alliances to contain it. Todays terrorists can kill innocent people, but they don't pose an existential threat to our nation, and we must not make the mistake of elevating them as if they do. That does their job for them. It makes them more important and helps them with recruitment. THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO RISK OF ISLAMIST I MEAN, VIOLENT EXTREMISTS OF NO VALID IDEOLOGY GETTING THEIR HANDS ON A NUKE. SO CASUALTY RATES WILL REMAIN IN THE HUNDREDS OR BELOW EACH YEAR WHICH IS ACCEPTABLE. AND ANYONE WHO TAKES THIS THREAT MORE SERIOUSLY THAN I DO, AND SPEAKS ABOUT IT PUBLICLY, OR PROPOSES TO DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT OTHER THAN WHAT I THINK IS THE RIGHT THING TO DO, IS TO BLAME FOR THE ATTACK THAT HAPPENS AFTER THEY SPEAK.
Our Article III courts have delivered justice faster than military trials PART OF RECOGNIZING HOW LOW LEVEL A PROBLEM IT IS TO HAVE ISLAMI I MEAN, VIOLENT EXTREMSISTS MURDERING RANDOM PEOPLE AT RANDOM INTERVALS IS THE IMPORTANCE OF TREATING INTERNATIONAL ISLAMI VIOLENT EXTREMISM AS A CRIMINAL PROBLEM NOT AS A THREAT TO OUR COUNTRY AS A WHOLE. ACTUALLY GOING TO THE PLACES WHERE ISLAMIST IDEOLOGY IS PROPAGATED, AND KILLING THE PEOPLE WHO RUN AND OPERATE THE ORGANIZATIONS THAT DO THAT, IS A WASTE OF TIME, AND WOULD KILL TOO MANY INNOCENT FOREIGNERS. ID RATHER HAVE INNOCENT AMERICANS KILLED INSTEAD IT MAKES ME FEEL SO MUCH MORE VIRTUOUS.
transparency and accountability serve our national security not just in times of peace, but, more importantly, in times of conflict. And thats why weve made public information about which terrorist organizations were fighting and why were fighting them. Weve released assessments of non-combatants killed in our operations, taken responsibility when mistakes are made. We've declassified information about interrogation methods that were wrong so we learn from past mistakes. And yesterday, I directed our government for the first time to release a full description of the legal and policy frameworks that guide our military operations around the world. THIS PART IS JUST ME MAKING A JOKE. I LOVE TRANSPARENCY EXCEPT WHEN ITS ABOUT WHAT MY ADMINISTRATION DOES TO AMERICANS THROUGH THE THE IRS, OR WHEN ENACTING A HEALTH CARE BILL TO CHANGE THE STRUCTURE OF 17% OF THE US ECONOMY, OR AT THE STATE DEPARTMENT, OR IN NEGOTIATING AGREEMENTS WITH THE PEACE-LOVING LEADERS OF IRAN. THEN, SECRECY IS ESSENTIAL FOR SUCCESS, AND ILL SEE TO SECRECY, EITHER BY CLASSIFYING EVERYTHING RELEVANT, REFUSING TO RELEASE DOCUMENTS THAT ARENT CLASSIFIED, OR IF ALL ELSE FAILS, JUST BY LYING.
AND SPEAKING OF LYING: Just think about what weve done these last eight years without firing a shot. Weve rolled back Irans nuclear program. Thats not just my assessment, thats the assessment of Israeli intelligence, even though they were opposed to the deal. SEE HOW WELL THAT WORKS?
We are fighting terrorists who claim to fight on behalf of Islam. But they do not speak for over a billion Muslims around the world, and they do not speak for American Muslims, IM AN EXPERT ON ISLAM AND ISLAMIC THEOLOGY, AND IM AUTHORIZED TO DEFINE THE OFFICIAL TEACHING OF THAT RELIGION AND TO DEFINE WHAT IS, AND IS NOT, WITHIN THE BORDERS OF ISLAMIC THOUGHT AND THEOLOGY. ALSO, THERE ARE OVER 1.6 BILLION MUSLIMS. IF OVER A BILLION DONT THINK ITS A GOOD IDEA TO BLOW UP ALL THE KUFIR TO GET THE 12TH IMAM TO COME OUT OF A WELL, BUT 500,000 DO THINK THAT, IM SATISFIED THAT WELL ALL BE SAFE (OR SAFE ENOUGH, ANYWAY. ILL BE ACTUALLY SAFE. THE REST OF YOU WILL BE SAFE ENOUGH. SAFE ENOUGH FOR ME.) AND ALSO, I KNOW FOR A FACT THAT THERE ARE NO ISLAMISTS WHO ARE CITIZENS OF THE UNITED STATES. NOT A SINGLE ONE. SO YOU SURE AS HELL CAN'T TAKE ANY STEPS TO FIND ANY OF THOSE. IT WOULD BE A VIOLATION OF EVERYTHING AMERICA STANDS FOR.
And for that reason, its important to remember that The United States of America is not a place where some citizens have to withstand greater scrutiny, or carry a special ID card, or prove that theyre not an enemy from within. NO-ONE, AND I MEAN NO-ONE, SHOULD BE SUBJECTED TO GREATER SCRUTINY BECAUSE HES AFFILIATED WITH ANY ASPECT OF WHAT IT CALLS ITSELF ISLAM, EVEN IF ITS A VERSION OF ISLAM THAT I JUST SAID ISNT ISLAM.
The universal right to speak your mind and to protest against authority, to live in a society thats open and free, that can criticize a President without retribution -- (applause) -- a country where you're judged by the content of your character rather than what you look like, or how you worship, or what your last name is, or where your family came from -- that's what separates us from tyrants and terrorists. SO MAKE SURE THAT, WHILE YOU WEAR YOUR UNIFORM, YOU COMPLAIN AS OFTEN AND AS LOUDLY AS POSSIBLE ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP.
SO MAKE SURE THAT, WHILE YOU WEAR YOUR UNIFORM, YOU COMPLAIN AS OFTEN AND AS LOUDLY AS POSSIBLE ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP.
+====================
US Mlitary Code of Conduct
An Article 15 offense according to the UCMJ...
Very good, much better than Google Translate!

The photo shows a typical current group of fawning little snowflake military members that are supposed to protect us.
Oh, yeah, I'm real confident about being protected by those alternate lifestyle, gender neutal, diverse military members.
I think General Lemay may have left an old cigar butt around, Zero could shove up his yaya!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.