Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Recount Results: Updates, Videos & Photos
Heavy ^ | 12/01/2016 | Jessica McBride

Posted on 12/01/2016 11:54:52 AM PST by stylin19a

Up to the minute updates of various Wisc. recount counties.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016recount; wi2016; wisconsinrecount
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-215 next last
To: avkillick

Well, you’re a good excel person. I didn’t want to @sum my way around Milwaukee.

And yeah, human error honestly made will go in both directions. These workers are retirees who wanted something to do for $50/day pay. They got no dog in the fight, most likely.


121 posted on 12/02/2016 4:33:46 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

The Pennsylvania totals that went to Hillary were the absentee and provisional ballots. They had those and knew the exact number outstanding on election night. When the call for trump was made(70k vote lead) they had already figured in that there were not enough ballots outstanding to change the outcome.
Philly is full of fraud. We all know this. But the 22k the witch received this week are on the up and up.


122 posted on 12/02/2016 4:37:26 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Every time mention is made of Milwaukee I cant help but think of Alice Cooper in ‘Wayne’s World’

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5FT3IGXtAk


123 posted on 12/02/2016 4:41:17 PM PST by avkillick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn

If they knew of these votes on election day then DT lead should have matched these numbers vs the 70,000 number settled in for 4 weeks. They are within 0.03% to a recount minus the courts no way they will miss the magic number. I say over the weekend.


124 posted on 12/02/2016 4:56:06 PM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

No idea what that means, but as of so far, the recount looks like it might yield a change from the election day lead of perhaps 70 votes, and in favor of Trump.

Meaning, add 70 votes to the 22,000 vote lead.

Still early tho. Only 11.3% recounted. Some of this recount data we have in is from heavily Clinton areas and it looks honest so far. There is no sign of anything absurd.


125 posted on 12/02/2016 5:03:10 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

No. They knew the amount of ballots that needed to be counted. They didn’t know who they were for. The absentee and provisional ballots must be verified before they can be added to the total. If the number of ballots are not sufficient to change the election outcome, they wait to count them until they have been verified legitimate, legal votes.
Trump was up by 70k election night. They knew that 28k outstanding votes would not have changed the outcome.


126 posted on 12/02/2016 5:07:15 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

You must have smarter voters than we do. During the 2012 election we had people trying to vote for 6 presidential candidates at the same time, and they refused to believe they weren’t allowed to do that.

I didn’t work in that room this year, but from the stories, it was the same deal.

I’d rather not have to look at the ballot, but when the voter is screaming that the machine is racist, and the line is backing up behind them, at some point you have to know WHY the ballot was rejected, and the voter refuses to believe they did anything wrong. Sending them to remake the ballot just means they vote for 6 different presidents again.


127 posted on 12/02/2016 5:12:41 PM PST by Ellendra (Those who kill without reason cannot be reasoned with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a
I am looking at day 2 spreadsheet.
Near as I can figure (from 479 Wards):

Preliminary - both lost votes:
Trump: -113
Hillary: -124

The above totals do not contain Milwaukee County numbers.
Milwaukee County counts do not reflect absentee ballot counts - the individual ward recount numbers are way off from the original counts.

The elections people made some inputing errors - input recounts from one ward into another ward's slot and vice\verse.
I have accounted for these.

Saulk County, City of Woodward, Ward 1 numbers are way too whacked to be accurate so they also are not included.

The big bang for the buck will be in Milwaukee & Dane counties.
128 posted on 12/02/2016 5:18:32 PM PST by stylin19a (obama = Fredo smart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
Trump was up by 70k election night. They knew that 28k outstanding votes would not have changed the outcome.

WAY to dangerous to let this go. Three weeks ago they are in effect saying; look DT is leading by 1.1%. So not to worry, the the 28k will only drop HRC from down 1.1% to down 0.8%. NO WHERE NEAR, the 0.5% that triggers auto recount. THAT, is WAY to close; esp when apparently PA law allows these to hit. In summ on Thur afternoon it took 28,000 votes to drop from 1.1% deficit to 0.8% deficit. ANOTHER 28,000 then hits the magic 0.5% ... and the screaming starts; no judges needed, we be entitled to a recount. At that point PA is lost.

129 posted on 12/02/2016 5:34:22 PM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

I agree Trump and his legal team need to keep eye on Pennsylvania. But they’re (rats) not going to get the vote under 30k, and into the automatic recount trigger margin, no matter what happens.
Democrats excel at getting thousands of fraudulent votes in on Election Day. They’re not going to do be able to sneak in that many now.
I’d bet good money the court rejects her request on Monday.


130 posted on 12/02/2016 5:38:46 PM PST by roostercogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Swanks

“22,000 out of thin air” where did that news come from?


131 posted on 12/02/2016 5:42:11 PM PST by Freedom of Speech Wins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: roostercogburn
I agree Trump and his legal team need to keep eye on Pennsylvania.

Jander Research ( https://janderresearch.blogspot.com/ ) is on this even talking today for 15 min with Trump team. I'm impress with her work. She says: "...Therefore, all recounts currently being considered, and currently ongoing, in Pennsylvania, are strictly barred and completely illegal.

And the fact that nobody on Donald Trump's legal team, or the legal team for the Republican party, has made motions to quash all of these recount efforts in Pennsylvania is frightening.

I spoke with one of the members of Donald Trump's legal team yesterday for 16 minutes, and I am not impressed at all with their filed response to the election contest, or their failure to do anything to stop all of the recounts. That these recounts are taking place in Pennsylvania under their watch borders on malpractice, if not an outright revolution."

132 posted on 12/02/2016 5:48:15 PM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: avkillick

There’s an unofficial rule here, that any mention of AC requires that I be pinged.

:)


133 posted on 12/02/2016 7:02:40 PM PST by Salamander (Leading a life of quiet desperation...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: All

FYI ppl, DU thread making an issue of more votes cast in Wisconsin towns then registered voters in that town.

One commenter pointed out that the registered voter count being used to draw that conclusion cannot be correct because Democrats got same day voter registration installed in Wisc.

So odds are pretty high the vote total exceeds the registration total because the same day registrants are not in that number.


134 posted on 12/02/2016 7:33:00 PM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra; All

Hand counting can be more accurate than machine counting because the well rested human eye and brain can determine results better than an optical scanner. For example if someone only fills in half of one of those little circles either because they are careless, or the lighting is poor (as it was in my polling place), or one has hands that shake from age or chill, the machine will probably reject.


135 posted on 12/03/2016 2:00:28 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Owen; All

In other states the absentee ballots were more for Hillary as they were often mailed before the new FBI statement came out.


136 posted on 12/03/2016 2:02:57 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

No evidence it was anything but human error.

Ongoing recount restarts this morning. The spreadsheet discussed above makes clear that so far, with 11.3% of the vote recounted, there is no substantial variance from election night.

Some details of interest. In recounting absentee ballots it was noticed that two ballot envelopes failed to list an address for a witness. (Their absentee rules require an absentee voter to have two witnesses sign the envelope saying the voter is who he is and give their address). The envelopes were apparently no longer “connected” to ballots, so a decision was made to extract 2 ballots randomly from the pile and not count them. Pretty weird ruling.

This morning’s little time eating controversy is over a ballot on which Hillary was a write in, with Rubio written in as VP. The ballot was not counted Election Day, but the Clinton observers want it counted now in recount.

Yesterday was day 2 and 330K votes were recounted, 11.3% of the total vote. Day 1 was just getting underway and only about 3000 votes were counted. One would expect even more than 330K today. This rate WILL finish on time, but anyone can slow it down at any time. If they don’t, odds are pretty high there will be no substantial change to totals. So far these all look like honest people.


137 posted on 12/03/2016 8:20:49 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Conversation suggests he Hillary/Rubio vote WAS counted Election Day. Recount officials are saying this should not have happened. Decision pending.


138 posted on 12/03/2016 8:48:14 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Owen

Oooooh.

The problem is the vote was not with a /.

It was a write in for Hillary Rubio. As if Rubio is her last name.

Completely bizarre. I can see both sides.


139 posted on 12/03/2016 8:50:51 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Owen

This is all from the live video feed.

Decision is to accept the ballot for Hillary. There is a tiny inkmark that may be a hyphen between Hillary and Rubio.

They are declaring voter intent is for Hillary, and this is a strong Trump county with the decision from a local person. It sounds fair overall.

Both Trump and Clinton observers have praised the 1 hour spent on that one ballot trying to get it right.


140 posted on 12/03/2016 8:55:20 AM PST by Owen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson