Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wisconsin Insider on Recount: Expect MASSIVE DNC Voter Fraud to be Exposed
Gateway Pundit ^ | 11/18/2016 | Jim Hoft

Posted on 11/28/2016 4:03:38 PM PST by GilGil

The Wisconsin Elections Commission set a timetable Monday for a recount of the presidential election but rejected a request for a hand recount. The commission is made up of three Democrats and three Republicans. It adopted the recount plans unanimously.

Meanwhile a Wisconsin insider on 4Chan said to expect the recount to expose massive DNC fraud.

The Anonymous “insider” says the recount will reveal people out of state voting, non citizens voting, people voting numerous times, and nursing home violations.

Be ready for Trump to improve his margin of victory.

Trump won Wisconsin by 27,506 votes.

(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 2016; 2016recount; 4chan; 4chanfakenews; clinton; fakenews; trump; voterfraud; wi2016; wisconsin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: GilGil

What about the prisons . If we can get the rolls cleaned and stop the fraud, the dems are in big trouble. They must be shaking with Trump taking office. Lets take California back and kick these losers to the back of the line.


81 posted on 11/28/2016 5:56:12 PM PST by Carry me back (Cut the feds by 90%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Voter fraud??? It will only confirm that Trump was right....once again....


82 posted on 11/28/2016 5:56:29 PM PST by HarleyD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Remember the little disclaimer on Stein’s scam page .... she gets to keep the money if it is not used in the recounts!


83 posted on 11/28/2016 6:07:02 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (The Mofia is a private crime family; whereas, the DOJ is the gov't's political crime family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I don’t see how recounting ballots would uncover rud. It wouldseem to me you would have to investigate voters instead.


84 posted on 11/28/2016 6:14:07 PM PST by amnestynone (We are asked by people who do not tolerate us to tolerate the intolerable in the name of tolerance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra
According to ALL the leftists and the MSM there was NO voter fraud in this election. What do the call letting out 60,000 felons from prison so they could vote. What about all the illegals who were enouraged by Obama to vote? And there was much more....

I can't wait till they have the proof of massive voter fraud and the numbers so they can shut the leftist' yaps....

85 posted on 11/28/2016 6:26:31 PM PST by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: funfan
Her whole argument is based on J. Alex Halderman who said that Trump could not have won.

As far as I'm aware, nobody has made any rulings based on that argument.

In Wisconsin, apparently, if you can pony up the money needed to fund it, then they'll do a recount.

In the absence of actual evidence of vote fraud, it seems to me that a recount should only proceed if the candidate requesting it can reasonably claim that the outcome could be changed.

So if they find the machines were hacked and you can not attribute who got the votes I say they will disqualify the vote or Trump in particular.

If there were some evidence of "hacking" to emerge, then who knows what would happen next; it would be unprecedented.

They are actually using “Polling” data that had Hillary in the lead as their argument that Trump should not have won.

That's a seriously lame argument, given the evidence of all the other states.

The whole thing stinks.

On that we agree...

86 posted on 11/28/2016 6:33:39 PM PST by sargon (The Revolution is ON! Support President-elect Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

The article is full of beans. Jill Clinton is not trying to FIND fraud, but to commit it under cover of the recount process. After reading the pdf at your link, I’d think pulling anything will be difficult IF Trump fields a team of diligent monitors at every recount venue. If he does not, much mischief could be made from deciding the “intent” of ambiguously marked ballots.


87 posted on 11/28/2016 6:42:04 PM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I though that Wisconsin voting districts are only going to re-tally the vote TOTALS - at least that’s what I heard today on radio news. If that’s the case, then no illegal votes will be detected.


88 posted on 11/28/2016 6:44:55 PM PST by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ellendra

What did they try to do ? Insist on voting without ID, or ID that was not on the list of acceptable IDs ? Or did they try to vote twice, in person even though they’d sent in an absentee ballot, or what ? Enquiring minds want to know.


89 posted on 11/28/2016 6:47:17 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

We keep winning!


90 posted on 11/28/2016 6:54:26 PM PST by Baseballguy (1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Old_Grouch

Another article said they would be verifying signatures in the register books. Whether that just means they have signatures for all the ballots in the boxes of checking the signatures against some other database like deaths or immigration status, it didn’t say.

What do they do if they come up with thousands of ballots in the boxes for which they have no register book signature ? They have no way of knowing how those extra ballots were voted, right ?

If those register books had a removable barcode label next to each name line, and it was attached to the ballot before placed in the box, you could actually remove those ballots. But that certainly isn’t how they do it at my polling place in CA.


91 posted on 11/28/2016 6:58:19 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Hattie

About the only thing they could find with a machine recount would be faulty or hacked reader machines. They might find that there were some machines which had been hacked to assign a predetermined percentage to each candidate, and if a different reader is used in the recount the numbers are WAYYY off.


92 posted on 11/28/2016 7:01:20 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 1riot1ranger

Yeah. “Bill flipped out and started acting like a crazy person!” And then he’s completely calm on anything we saw.

But, I do think people need to stop acting like the Clintons are omnipotent beings who always have a plan and always get their way. It was treated like a given by some that she would easily cheat her way in, but she couldn’t.


93 posted on 11/28/2016 7:05:10 PM PST by Rastus (#NeverHillary #AlwaysTrump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: GilGil
4chan? Good grief.

Wisconsin insider? Yeah, sure. That Pepe sure gets around.

94 posted on 11/28/2016 7:18:58 PM PST by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

All she needs to do is start a foundation. Then she can donate all this money to her foundation. As head of her foundation, she can pay herself administration fees for the rest of her life. Like Hillary.


95 posted on 11/28/2016 7:21:52 PM PST by Dogbert41 (All the days of my life were written in your book before there was one of them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

I thought the recount was just going to be a re-tabulation of the machines’ results. How can thye detect fraud that way?


96 posted on 11/28/2016 7:22:29 PM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

someone on a thread earlier today made it seem a recount does not look at name sod voters. That is was just recounting actual ballots. I’d be glad if they do recheck voter rolls and signatures etc and if they come up with people who should not have voted but did.


97 posted on 11/28/2016 7:23:17 PM PST by b4me (If Jesus came to set us free, why are so many professed Believers still in chains?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dogbert41

Or, congress and trump can go after these people like pittbulls


98 posted on 11/28/2016 7:24:40 PM PST by Professional
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: stylin19a

What gets me is that if they find they have more ballots than they have voters in the poll books, they RANDOMLY REMOVE that many ballots.

This makes no sense to me. If 100,000 extra ballots turn up and they all came from Dim shenanigans, random removal will hurt Trump more than it will Hillary. It would cost Trump 50,000 real votes but leave 50,000 extra fraudulent votes for Hillary. I suppose it doesn’t change the margin of votes he wins by if you subtract 50K from each, but it is still crummy. I’d rather something was done to try to identify which ballots were fakes. Some way to remove the whole 100K just from Hillary.


99 posted on 11/28/2016 7:28:09 PM PST by Kellis91789 (We hope for a bloodless revolution, but revolution is still the goal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GilGil

Don’t spoil the fun.


100 posted on 11/28/2016 7:58:32 PM PST by Norseman (Defund the Left....completely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson