Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sexist Views Could Harm Men's Health: Study
UPI ^ | MONDAY, Nov. 21, 2016

Posted on 11/23/2016 2:09:55 PM PST by nickcarraway

Men who have "playboy" attitudes and believe in power over women may face a higher risk for mental health trouble than men who don't, a broad new research review suggests.

The finding on sexism, and other so-called "traditional views" on masculinity, stems from an analysis of 74 studies conducted between 2003 and 2013. The studies included nearly 19,500 predominantly white male participants, the researchers said.

ADVERTISING

The research "looked at expectations about what it means to be masculine, and how that relates to mental health outcomes among men," explained study lead author Y. Joel Wong.

"What we found overall is that the more that men conformed to masculine norms the poorer their mental health, and the less likely they were to seek mental health services," he said. Wong is associate professor of counseling and educational psychology at Indiana University Bloomington

Wong's team published the findings in the Nov. 21 online issue of the Journal of Counseling Psychology.

Most of the studies involved white males, ranging in age from preteens to seniors over 65.

Wong's team focused on data concerning the embrace of 11 different types of so-called "masculine norms," including the desire to win; to retain emotional control; to take risks; to engage in violence; to exert dominant behavior; to participate in a "playboy" lifestyle; to be self-reliant; to elevate work to the highest level of importance; to retain power over women; to maintain a disdain for homosexuals; and to pursue "status."

In turn, an embrace of such norms was stacked up against the risk for developing a range of mental health issues, including depression, stress, body image trouble, and/or difficulty socializing with others.

In the end, the researchers found that men who adhere to masculine norms are generally in a worse state of mental health, and less motivated to seek psychological help. Key demographic factors, such as race, age and sexual orientation, were not found to have any bearing on the overall finding.

However, digging deeper, the team noted that educational background varied between studies, with a stronger association between the favoring of masculine norms and mental health problems seen among adults who lacked a college education.

What's more, the analysis revealed, only four of the masculine norms were actually "significantly" associated with poor mental health. Those included a preference for retaining emotional control, promiscuous playboy behavior, self-reliance, and power over women.

Of those, self-reliance was the trait most strongly associated with worse psychological outcomes.

On the other hand, while risk-taking was associated with poorer mental health, it was also "significantly" linked to better overall mental health.

Wong also observed that conforming to masculine norms was more likely to be associated with being lonely, hostile or having problems socializing than it was to a risk for depression.

The study team cautioned that what they observed was associations, rather than direct cause-and-effect between adherence to masculine norms and poor psychological well-being.

And, Wong stressed, "the findings don't allow us to answer the question as to why."

He did have theories, however. "I would say that it could be that these norms are increasingly being rejected and thought of as outdated, which means some men might get pushback by people who are uncomfortable with these norms," he said.

"For example, if you were maybe sexually promiscuous in the past, your partner might have just tolerated that. But today you might get pushback. So it could be much more stressful for a playboy today than it would've been in the past," Wong said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: sitzpinkler; sumtingwong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

1 posted on 11/23/2016 2:09:55 PM PST by nickcarraway
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Id love to see a story exactly with this tone on women.

War on men continues unabated.


2 posted on 11/23/2016 2:12:42 PM PST by Secret Agent Man ( Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

I think he’s wong.


3 posted on 11/23/2016 2:12:43 PM PST by RckyRaCoCo (FUMSM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Your tax dollars at work.


4 posted on 11/23/2016 2:13:45 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Freep mail me if you want to be on my Fingerstyle Acoustic Guitar Ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Fake science, conducted by emasculated, pajama boys.


5 posted on 11/23/2016 2:14:03 PM PST by Windflier (Pitchforks and torches ripen on the vine. Left too long, they become black rifles.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

There is sum ting wong with his conclusions!


6 posted on 11/23/2016 2:15:01 PM PST by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

Did they include the Mexican machismo guys?


7 posted on 11/23/2016 2:16:34 PM PST by amihow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

8 posted on 11/23/2016 2:18:45 PM PST by Uncle Miltie (The Media were SuperPacs for Clinton. Throw them in prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: amihow

>>Did they include the Mexican machismo guys?

That would be ray-cess. Same for studying black men.


9 posted on 11/23/2016 2:19:16 PM PST by Bryanw92 (If we had some ham, we could have ham and eggs, if we had some eggs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

......when we were kids in high school (late sixties) we would pass each other in the hallway, hold up our hand extended as far as our arm would go in an open fist and go “Wonnnnnnnng”.

This stupid article reminds me of this stupidity!


10 posted on 11/23/2016 2:20:40 PM PST by Cen-Tejas (it's the debt bomb stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

But women who have militant feminist views are mentally healthy, right?

They and jihadis are in fact the craziest of the world’s crazies. It’s no wonder they’re bedfellows, despite their (apparent) difference of views.

Fact is, fembots and jihadis despise many of the same things — Judeo-Christian values, capitalism, individualism, personal responsibility.....and most of all, white American conservative men.


11 posted on 11/23/2016 2:20:43 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Of those, self-reliance was the trait most strongly associated with worse psychological outcomes.

What a bunch of manufactured poppycock.

12 posted on 11/23/2016 2:20:55 PM PST by blueplum ((March 11, 2016 - the day the First Amendment died?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

The men of my father’s day were not neutered but they were not playboys either.


13 posted on 11/23/2016 2:22:04 PM PST by Socon-Econ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

“Men who have “playboy” attitudes and believe in power over women may face a higher risk for mental health trouble than men who don’t”

***

absolutely stupid. Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to chain up the rest of my women in the basement who fail to call me master..


14 posted on 11/23/2016 2:22:28 PM PST by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: max americana

” I need to chain up the rest of my women in the basement who fail to call me master..”

Don’t forget to do it while wearing a smoking jacket, smoking a cigar and sipping an adult beverage.


15 posted on 11/23/2016 2:24:01 PM PST by TalonDJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway; All

see also

Masculine white men more likely to be mentally ill, says new ‘study’
American Thinker ^ | November 22, 2016 | Ed Straker

Posted on 11/22/2016, 2:02:53 AM by detective

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3497107/posts


16 posted on 11/23/2016 2:24:35 PM PST by SteveH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

More likey to get their butt kicked by their wives.


17 posted on 11/23/2016 2:27:46 PM PST by Fido969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

It’s true. Not getting laid makes me crazy.


18 posted on 11/23/2016 2:33:05 PM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway

So I’m going to wussify myself completely, and start acting in a feminine way - so I can avoid issues of mental health?

Just one more piece of research that uses flawed assumptions and manipulated data to achieve the desired results........

BALDERDASH!!


19 posted on 11/23/2016 2:37:45 PM PST by Arlis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nickcarraway
Men who have "playboy" attitudes and believe in power over women may face a higher risk for mental health trouble than men who don't, a broad new research review suggests.

That's the type of results you get when you let broads do research.

20 posted on 11/23/2016 2:42:38 PM PST by KarlInOhio (" T'was the witch of November come stealin' " And who could the stealing Witch of November be? Hmm?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-32 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson