Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why I’m staying at 18F GSA Digital Services
Medium.com ^ | 11/21/2016 | Noah Kunin

Posted on 11/21/2016 6:47:40 AM PST by spintreebob

Over the past year, many people have asked what I’ll do after the election. It’s reasonable to assume my public service is connected to my personal politics. But I don’t see it that way.

For one, my politics have changed quite a bit after serving in the federal government for 6 years. They haven’t shifted across the simple “left-right” spectrum that does the complexity of our country such a disservice.

Instead, while my expectation of what government both can and should do is much more conservative than before, I’ve never been more optimistic that for those things we can do, we can build services that are effective, efficient, open, humane, participatory, and even delightful, at costs lower than ever before. Politicians may (and will) disagree passionately on what government should do. But they all say that for whatever the government does, we should do it well. My oath to this country was not to a particular office, or person, and certainly not to a political party. It was to the Constitution and to the people (emphasis added)

I do solemnly swear that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same…

That’s why I believe that no matter the result of the presidential election, I have to stay. People have to see that the work 18F, the United States Digital Service, and so many other people who have recently signed up for public service, continues. That’s notwithstanding the huge numbers of public servants who have been laboring to do the right thing all along, and have not been given the tools they need to succeed and serve.

This movement is not bound to the current administration. It is not an ideological movement meant to serve a particular President’s agenda, or even a particular Congress’ agenda.

This isn’t just about technology. It’s about whether any of the systems that govern our society can be made to work, or deserve our trust.

Let’s find out.

[Views above are exclusively my own]


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government
KEYWORDS: constitution; oath
I found this interesting. Not everyone is in panic mode.
1 posted on 11/21/2016 6:47:40 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

This person is both articulate and sincere, but I have no idea who they are.


2 posted on 11/21/2016 6:53:51 AM PST by lee martell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

“people who have recently signed up for public service,”

Signing up for Obamacare could be viewed as signing up for “public service” but it depends on who’s doing the viewing.


3 posted on 11/21/2016 6:54:02 AM PST by equaviator (There's nothing like the universe to bring you down to earth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

“many other people who have recently signed up for public service,”

It’s easy to be real patriotic when you’re getting paid double what your worth, exempted from the rules (Obamacare) and can retire 10 years earlier (55) than those citizens you allegedly “serve”.

The term “public service” is offensive.

Fedgov workers all need their salaries cut in half, be forced onto Obamacare Bronze, and all pensions be rolled into the “social security trust fund” where those you “serve” can access it.


4 posted on 11/21/2016 6:58:39 AM PST by JPJones (George Washington's Tariffs were Patriotic. Build a Wall and Build a Wall of tariffs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

For people in technology or some other area of government where it is less ideological, I can see this guy and his attitude. It will be different in other areas, say health care or some other ideologically driven area.


5 posted on 11/21/2016 7:02:31 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JPJones
The term “public service” is offensive.

Yes it is. It's a "service" they are well paid for. Similar to a whore. Comments like that are why my wife refuses to take me to parties with her fellow federal employees anymore. You want brownie points for providing a service - volunteer. Otherwise you're just another paid schlub - just like the rest of us. And an over-paid one too when you're working for the govt.
6 posted on 11/21/2016 7:11:26 AM PST by Garth Tater (What's mine is mine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

I’d think the poor man is bone-weary after all those years trying to swim upstream.


7 posted on 11/21/2016 7:29:58 AM PST by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO! #MyPresident)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lee martell

“...but I have no idea who they are.”
**************************************************
They are “a startup at the White House”... the OBAMA WHITE HOUSE.

I wonder who the Obamaites staffed this bureaucracy with?

www.usds.gov


8 posted on 11/21/2016 7:34:39 AM PST by House Atreides (Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

Has anyone (except the very rich) ever talked to a “public servant” and felt they were dealing with their servant?


9 posted on 11/21/2016 8:06:50 AM PST by fella ("As this was before Noah so shall it be again,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

I’m now in healthcare IT (Medicaid). It is very political both ideologically political and game playing political.

Slavitt, the regulation writer at CMS (of HHS) publicly stated last summer that before Jan 20,2017 his goal was to create a massive number of new rules and regulations to regulate insurance companies, hospitals, doctors and other providers, IT contractors, drug companies ... and yes, you and me.

He is an ideolog and bureaucrat who has worked hard and is keeping his promise. His regulations alone are in the many thousands of pages. Many are very IT specific. Others are very Doctor specific.

Since taking his job, Slavitt has turned doctors into Data Entry Clerks who have no time to examine or talk with patients.

Much of the technology he imposes on IT is very 1990s with no appreciation for the rapid changes in both hardware and software.


10 posted on 11/21/2016 8:50:51 AM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: spintreebob

https://spectator.org/the-curious-case-of-andy-slavitt/


11 posted on 11/21/2016 11:56:14 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator

Good article. Last chapter has yet to be written. Slavitt is doing enough every day for a chapter per day. Can’t sat he’s a slacker.


12 posted on 11/21/2016 2:41:57 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson