The Head of DOJ’s Civil Rights Division Is Violating Federal Law and Her Actions May Be Void

Daily Signal ^

[ameribbean expat]

Vanita Gupta, the acting head of the U.S. Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division, apparently has been working in violation of federal law for more than a year and a half.

That may render all of the official actions she has taken during that period—lawsuits, demand letters, hires, you name it—“void” and of no effect.

[philman_36]

She must be one of those lawyers talking about leaving early.

[okie01]

It calls into question the validity of all lawsuits initiated by the division that she authorized; any pleadings filed with the federal courts such as the consent decree with Ferguson that she signed in March 2016 or in DOJ’s litigation against voter ID laws in North Carolina and Texas;...

Somebody needs to get this into the hands of Texas Gov. Greg Abbott and AG Ken Paxton.

The State can sue for relief from the judicial verdict that required re-writing our Voter ID law.

[Swordmaker]

Can of ObamaWorms™

[BigpapaBo]

“Here’s a quarter, go downtown and have a rat rat naw that thing on your face.”
Uncle Buck

[Paul R.]

I’ve skimmed through the actual Act. Maybe I’m missing something: Where are the actual penalties for violating the law? The most I see is:

---

If the Comptroller General of the United States makes a determination
that an officer is serving longer than the 210-day period including the applicable
exceptions to such period under section 3346 or section 3349a, the Comptroller General shall report such determination immediately to —
“(1) the Committee on Governmental Affairs of the Senate;
“(2) the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight of the House of
Representatives;
“(3) the Committees on Appropriations of the Senate and House of
Representatives;
“(4) the appropriate committees of jurisdiction of the Senate and House of
Representatives;
“(5) the President; and
“(6) the Office of Personnel Management.

---

That’s it?

[Paul R.]

http://www.gsa.gov/graphics/admin/Vacancies_Reform_Act1998.pdf

[Thud]

This is great fun.

[10mm]

[ameribbean expat]

Not presently disposed to interpret the nuances of federal law, but if you click on the link in the article, I believe the stipulation mentioned is contained in subpara c2.

[kalee]

I think that’s a mole.

[Whenifhow]

See article and post 16
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3495208/posts?page=16#16

[MinuteGal]

Looky at all the deliciously scandalous and illegal things that have come out on the Obama/Clinton thugocracy during the campaign and continuing today....and tomorrow and the next day...and right up to Inauguration Day.

Then, JUST THINK of what President Trump and the eagles and hawks in his administration will dig up on this federal crime syndicate AFTER he's sworn in.

Oh, man....I can't wait......I can't wait.....

Leni

[reaganaut]

legal ping. What are Trump’s options?

[Rome2000]

Awesome.

[xrmusn]

Forehead dot INCLUDED..!
= = = = = = = = = = = = =
When ‘they’ became convenience employees of choice I knew a Cop who described them in a report after an incident as

Push Start & Pull Start.

Got pretty high up the ‘chain’ but got caught and changed before it caused him trouble.

Guess today they would can him and toss out his 25 years or so of service.

Being a former Marine (Korea + Vietnam) he had absolutely NO problem with the US ‘minorities’....
Though he did believe in ‘equal opportunity’ arrests...<: <:

[trebb]

Many DOJ folks will be self-deporting soon to try to stay out of the sights of the new AG and others....a good number need to be made example of because of the issues when the Justice System goes corrupt. Lynch for sure and wouldn’t it be nice if the net could also snare Holder?

[polymuser]

Identify, isolate, spotlight, ridicule, remove, penalize.