Posted on 11/16/2016 7:26:05 AM PST by dirtboy
So Philly.com knowingly supported a candidate for President who would need a pardon to stay out of prison?
If GWB had done his job, we wouldn’t have been saddled with Clinton corruption. If Trump doesn’t do his duty, it just shows we really are a banana republic. The dems cover for her and the pubbies let her slide.
I’ve been wondering the same thing.
soebarkah’s price for hillary’s pardon just shot up exponentially.
The enemy islamist’s problem is, who’ll pardon his skinny ass?
she’s supremely amoral and wikileaks illustrated that she did not mind repeatedly rubbing elbows with ongoing child molesters.
whether she molested any child herself, is up for any investigation to locate. not even wikileaks produced that kind of smoking gun. going off half cocked about this kind of thing always comes back to bite later.
“...However, a pardon would permanently scar her legacy...”
And a lengthy prison sentence wouldn’t????
Commentary: First on Trump to-do list is pardon prosecute Clinton
We do not live in those times. As I have posted before, I share your bloodlust, but half the people don't. They believe:
1) She is being unjustly pursued by a vast right wing conspiracy.
2) She is innocent.
3) If she did do anything the ends justify the means.
4) The laws don't apply to liberals like Hillary.
5) Any combination of the above.
This is the mindset of almost half of your fellow citizens. It is their reality, not ours. They have truly lost their minds. Imagine their reaction to her prosecution, no matter how much proof you have of her crimes.
Without the threat of jailtime for her and her henchpeople, lots of bad stuff will stay just like it is.
to help restore law and order HILLARY must be prosecuted
it was a campaign promise and people voted for trump as a way of voting to convict hillary
anything less will allow current future corruption to flourish.
corruption is a cancer on the government and must be cut out completely
healing can take place after the punishment.
to let her off the hook again would be a travesty of justice.
file enough serious charges against her to give her a chance to plea guilty to lesser charge
as for the foundation it needs to be destroyed and penniless
chelsea needs to be charged also if indicated to prevent her from running for future office/position in the us
when you clean house make it a clean sweep
Trump looks magnanimous in victory and the Clintons are still in a heap of trouble. What are people going to riot for then? An unconditional pardon???
I suspect she does have material on O. But it’s likely of a nature that if she disclosed it, it would expose her own criminality. Like one bank robber threatening to go to the cops if the other doesn’t cough up more money. So in the end the effect will be as if she had nothing on him.
On the other hand, if O pardons H and the investigation uncovers criminal behavior on his part, he has no bargaining chip. He can’t say “I’ll rollover on Hillary for immunity!”. So I would think he has a vested interest in not pardoning her.
I could imagine Trump publishing a list of the most solid and serious accusations against Hillary and then asking people in polls, what do they think ought to be done.
She is a willfully destructive pest.
“that he may misuse the vast powers of the presidency.”
I think you meant to say obama ‘did’ misuse the vast powers of the presidency.
Pardons are for penalties imposed by a legal authority upon conviction for a crime. So do they want to admit that hillary committed a crime?
I think they amount to the same thing.
She MUST be held accountable for her actions, otherwise why have any laws at all including against acts of TREASON. WHEN will people understand there MUST be ACCOUNTABILITY and BREAKING the LAW has consequences? Make an example of her or forget about restoring LAW and ORDER in the USA.
Trump should say that his AG will confer with the FBI and it’s up to the professionals in law enforement whether to proceed. Too many people have been prosecuted for less than what we know about Mrs. Clinton, we can’t just look the other way because of “who she is.” That is not the American way of everyone being “equal under the law.”
It might get weird if some Republican Senators and other hight-ups are involved. That would just be icing on the cake!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.