Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump to Support Nationwide Concealed Carry
PJ Media ^ | November 11, 2016 | Michael Walsh

Posted on 11/12/2016 3:09:53 AM PST by BradtotheBone

Republican presidential frontrunner Donald Trump -- who said he has a concealed carry permit -- called for the expansion of gun rights Friday, including making those permits applicable nationwide. In a position paper published on his website Friday afternoon, Trump called for the elimination of gun and magazine bans, labeling them a "total failure."

"Law-abiding people should be allowed to own the firearm of their choice. The government has no business dictating what types of firearms good, honest people are allowed to own," Trump wrote.

It's not a departure from what he's said on the trail this year, though it does mark a shift from a position he took in his 2000 book "The America We Deserve," where Trump stated that he generally opposes gun control but that he supported a ban on assault weapons and a longer waiting period to get a gun.

"Opponents of gun rights try to come up with scary sounding phrases like 'assault weapons', 'military-style weapons' and 'high capacity magazines' to confuse people," Trump wrote Friday. "What they’re really talking about are popular semi-automatic rifles and standard magazines that are owned by tens of millions of Americans."

(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: 2ndammendment; banglist; concealedcarry; guncontrol; guns; trump; trumpagenda; trumpbanglist; trumptransition
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-205 next last
To: BradtotheBone

yes!


101 posted on 11/12/2016 6:02:38 AM PST by dadfly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

“Law-abiding people should be allowed to own the firearm of their choice. The government has no business dictating what types of firearms good, honest people are allowed to own,” Trump wrote.

Just savor that for a moment.


102 posted on 11/12/2016 6:02:43 AM PST by avenir (I'm pessimistic about man, but I'm optimistic about GOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

>Donald Trump — who said he has a concealed carry permit — called for the expansion of gun rights Friday, including making those permits applicable nationwide.
>

Methinks the author needs some remedial Civics classes: Permits != Rights.

‘Bout the only ‘expansion’ that is required is the ABOLITION of any/all gun ‘control’ laws.


103 posted on 11/12/2016 6:04:51 AM PST by i_robot73 ("A man chooses. A slave obeys." - Andrew Ryan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ancesthntr

DC proper is a simple matter - too simple, it appears, for Congress to figure out on their own:

“The Congress shall have the power...To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States”

DC reciprocity for all 50 states should be passed IMMEDIATELY when President-elect Trump is sworn in.


104 posted on 11/12/2016 6:08:56 AM PST by Jim Noble (The pump don't work 'cause the vandals took the handles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Whoa. That’s how I imagine Reagan explaining it. Pure common sense concentrated into a single easy to remember sentence.


105 posted on 11/12/2016 6:14:46 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Yes.

Felons who can’t be trusted on the streets with guns— can’t be trusted on the streets.

Courtrooms full of armed people would be as dangerous as Gun Stores and Gun Shows full of armed people.

“Brandishing” is CONDUCT. Like “murder” is CONDUCT, not an unconstitutional restriction on ownership (”keeping”) and carrying (”bearing”).

Then there’s this:

“Brandishing” laws sound cool until you realize that you can be “guilty” under them if someone sees the item’s outline under your clothes. Makes as much sense as “drunk driving” laws which scoop up people sleeping it off in the back seats of their parked cars. I was shocked when I heard that’s a real thing.


106 posted on 11/12/2016 6:17:00 AM PST by ExGeeEye (For dark is the suede that mows like a harvest.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Article Four, Section One of the U.S. Constitution:

Full Faith and Credit shall be given in each State to the public Acts, Records, and judicial Proceedings of every other State. And the Congress may by general Laws prescribe the Manner in which such Acts, Records and Proceedings shall be proved, and the Effect thereof.

If judges and justices followed the Constitution this would be fait accompli and legislation would be unnecessary.

107 posted on 11/12/2016 6:19:54 AM PST by katana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

Fantastic news!

We ought to be able to drive across the USA without worrying about violating the patchwork of gun laws in each state we cross.


108 posted on 11/12/2016 6:22:55 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: papertyger

Let’s go at this the same way the left does. We take a step in the right direction, then we take the next step.

One of the beautiful things about this election is that it’s going to let us take some might big steps!


109 posted on 11/12/2016 6:25:04 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: novemberslady

:-)

I keep waking up to Christmas every day since the election!

Prayers of thanks.


110 posted on 11/12/2016 6:26:31 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: generally

It’s morning in America again

I’ve been a big fan of Trump for a long time

You all have not seen anything yet. You will be amazed.

He’s Amazing


111 posted on 11/12/2016 6:31:28 AM PST by Democrat_media (President Trump has to change the 1965 immigration act so he can get a 2nd term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

..... and I remember those last fall who said “Oh, he’s not Conservative enough!”

He da man


112 posted on 11/12/2016 6:31:49 AM PST by Strac6 (We banded together to defeat The Hildabeast. All the rest will be easy s**t)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
"How about a civil rights czar."

Good idea. But I'd prefer that they start with federal laws and repeal those first.

Return power to the states, then clean them up.

113 posted on 11/12/2016 6:32:47 AM PST by MV=PY (The Magic Question: Who's paying for it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: papertyger; All

It’s morning in America again

I’ve been a big fan of Trump for a long time

You all have not seen anything yet. You will be amazed.

He’s Amazing


114 posted on 11/12/2016 6:35:02 AM PST by Democrat_media (President Trump has to change the 1965 immigration act so he can get a 2nd term)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

A federal law that says concealed carry must be recognized by all states can at some future date be replaced by a law saying concealed carry cannot be recognized across state lines. That’s why concealed carry is, and must be, a state issue and any such law passed by Congress should be overturned on 10th Amendment grounds”

Actually, no.

The second amendment is not a state issue. It is entirely within the federal jurisdiction to not allow constitutional rights to be limited by states.

States may try to pass laws to limit concealed carry (and they have) but it is not constitutional for them to do so.


115 posted on 11/12/2016 6:40:51 AM PST by RFEngineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

While we’re at it, disarm all government agencies that have no business having weapons.


116 posted on 11/12/2016 6:41:20 AM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal the 16th Amendment)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Helicondelta

Yep. More of a right to carry than the left believing health care is a right. But they are such hypocrites. Babies in the womb they deny the right to life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. The ultimate denial of health care . . . they kill them instead.


117 posted on 11/12/2016 6:41:34 AM PST by Qwackertoo (Worst 8 years ever, First Affirmative Action President, I hope those who did this to us SUFFER MOST!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BradtotheBone

i hope this becomes a federal issue again so states like California cant pull the crap they’re doing now. Im all for states rights but the right to bear arms is a constitutional right and states shouldn’t be able to put restrictions on the constitution


118 posted on 11/12/2016 6:44:51 AM PST by jneesy (I want my country back and Trump is gonna give it to me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

I don’t understand this, could you please explain?

If marriage in one state is recognized in all states, and a driver’s license in one state is recognized in all states, then why not a CCW?


119 posted on 11/12/2016 6:46:09 AM PST by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Jack Hydrazine

Because you seem to be suggesting a principles based remedy for a problem that arose from the rejection, or at least diminution, of principles.


120 posted on 11/12/2016 6:47:59 AM PST by papertyger (The semantics define how we think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-205 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson