"Trump’s path to an electoral college victory isn’t narrow. It’s nonexistent." (Oh yeah?)

The Washington Post ^ | October 18, 2016 | Stuart Rothenberg

[Doctor Freeze]

The trajectory of the 2016 presidential race — which will result in a Hillary Clinton victory — remains largely unchanged from May, when Donald Trump and Clinton were in the process of wrapping up their nominations.

But what has changed recently is Clinton’s likely winning margin. For many weeks, even months, I have believed that Clinton would defeat Trump by three to six points. If anything, that range now looks a bit low, with the Democratic nominee apparently headed for a more convincing victory, quite possibly in the four-to-eight-point range.

[Doctor Freeze]

"But the most important question is no longer whether Trump or Clinton will win but how large Clinton’s margin will be and whether she will have coattails." - Stuart Rothenberg, October 18, 2016

We should never let him forget this article for as long as he lives on this earth.

[Chainmail]

Crow. I recommend a large helping of crow for the Left-wing media.

[Red Badger]

Politics Rule #1:

NEVER BELIEVE YOUR OWN PROPAGANDA!.....................

[ScaniaBoy]

No feeling as good as real and pure

SCHADENFREUDE

[IronJack]

Way to go, Stuart. Remind me not to ask you for any winning lottery numbers.

[SERKIT]

[clintonh8r]

If I were married to Rosa Delaura I’d be f’ed up in the head, too....

[manc]

Let them live in al la land, and show us all their baby tantrums when they keep losing.
They have been losing since obama has had the White house, but do not expect the media to ask has the Dem party gone too far left like they asked us going too far right when we lost the senate, house and White House.

[Bernard]

whether she will have coattails

And what they smell like. John Podesta says urine, cabbage, and farts. Based on how he has had his nose in the landing area, he should know.

[abb]

I know Stu. Way back in the days of National Empowerment TV (the old satellite network of Paul Weyrech), I used to visit with Stu quite often. On a visit to DC, my wife and I even went over to his home and shared some Mogen David.

Haven’t corresponded with him in several years. I guess I should email him and ask him when he will do a mia culpa.

[cpforlife.org]

We, the pointy headed intellectuals, forecast that her highness, Secretary Clinton will win 450 - 500 EV. That is all, you are hereby dismissed from our hallowed presence....

…

… . .. ...

…

…

[tflabo]

Crow Sushi-— with wasabi and soy sauce of course.

[SoFloFreeper]

Here is a photo of the genius Stuart Rothenberg. Genius.

He is @StuPolitics on twitter. What a failure. Quit your job, Stu.

[cherry]

"Trump is and has been a disaster as a presidential nominee, and that will not change in the campaign’s final days"

Not only was Trump not a disaster as a candidate, he was unusually effective and efficient, inspiring and reassuring all the same time.....HE WAS AN EXCELLENT CANDIDATE....

this writer also talks about Pa/Wis/Michagan as states that Trump would not win....hardee har har....

and he took North Carolina too....

it makes me so happy to see these punks get their due....

[WKUHilltopper]

MSM...you’ve been exposed as lying traitors. Go away now.

[MNDude]

I just checked out his Twitter account for election night. Another employee from the Washington Post sent him a tweet that said “come down three floors, we have a party raging. “ To which he replied “don’t tempt me. “

It is so delicious to learn that the Washington Post actually had a party going on early Tuesday night.

[ScaniaBoy]

Excellent graph! Thanks for posting!

[notdownwidems]

Not only was Trump not a disaster as a candidate, he was unusually effective and efficient, inspiring and reassuring all the same time

Well that IS a disaster for Stu, here!

[InterceptPoint]

This is a keeper.

[Bob]

It looks like hillary was a lock, at least until the polls started closing. :=)