Posted on 11/06/2016 8:16:17 AM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
Pension funds and other asset owners increasingly are investing in U.S. infrastructure, often buying the assets from infrastructure money managers.
This could be a win-win. Investor interest comes at a time when the first crop of infrastructure funds raised in the U.S. in 2004 and 2005 are coming to the end of their 10-year life span. Managers are expected to bring more transactions to market to take advantage of growing interest by direct investors.
Industry insiders expect more infrastructure core projects to change to institutional investor ownership. Investors prize the core projects, even though returns generally are lower than investments in new projects, because of the yield that core infrastructure could generate.
Several deals have been made in this year alone:
More deals are in the works, including Macquarie Infrastructure Partners' 50% stake in the operating company that owns the Dulles Greenway toll road in Virginia and the expected sale of the operator of the Northwest Parkway Toll Authority in Colorado.
Officials at CalPERS, OMERS and CPPIBG declined to comment.
“There's a decent amount of activity in surface transportation projects,” said Michael Likosky, principal and head of infrastructure in the New York office of 32 Advisors LLC, an infrastructure brokerage firm. “Pension funds are playing a larger role than ever before.”
Driving the activity is that more of these projects are being put up for sale, Mr. Likosky said. A number of toll road public-private partnerships have declared bankruptcy or nearly went bankrupt, providing pension fund investors with potential bargains.
What's more, asset owners making these direct investments are not looking for private equity-style returns, he said.
“They are OK with lower returns,” Mr. Likosky said. For example, CalPERS' benchmark for its $2.6 billion infrastructure portfolio is the consumer price index plus 4%. In the 12 months ended Sept. 30, the CPI's all items index rose 1.5% before seasonal adjustment.
Asset owners are more interested in the predictable cash flows generated by existing toll roads, Mr. Likosky said. Because the toll roads have been operating for several years, investors have the luxury of knowing how much traffic revenue is being generated, he said. Original investors relied on often-flawed traffic projections.
Asset owners also are more comfortable investing in infrastructure these days because many are now more experienced in the asset class, Mr. Likosky said.
Ontario Teachers' Pension Plan officials make direct investments in infrastructure on an opportunistic basis, said Deborah Allen, spokeswoman for the Toronto-based pension fund. “Prices are pretty high these days,” she said. “We don't want to overpay. ... It depends on how much it costs and how it balances out with the risks.”
With more deals on the horizon, institutional investors are taking steps to ensure they have the capabilities to invest directly in infrastructure. “We see large institutional investors — insurance companies and pension funds — forming groups or expanding existing groups that can invest in infrastructure directly,” said Michael Gordon, U.S. president and CEO of Lombard International, a global insurance company that partners with fund managers and institutional investors.
The expected increase in direct investments is part of the overall growth in infrastructure investment by institutional investors.
Fundraising approached record levels in the third quarter, with 17 infrastructure funds closing on a combined $23 billion, nearing the highest-ever quarterly fundraising total of $24 billion in the fourth quarter of 2013, according to London-based alternative investment research firm Preqin.
Meanwhile, the largest number of infrastructure deals in the third quarter came in North America, with 71 deals worth a combined $15.2 billion in the U.S., according to Preqin.
“I think there's a lot of interest in U.S. infrastructure, and so as fixed-income yields have not been there, a lot of investors that are looking to match assets and liabilities effectively are looking at infrastructure,” Mr. Gordon said.
The vast majority of asset owners invest in infrastructure through funds because they lack the internal capabilities to invest directly, but there is a growing appetite by public pension funds, sovereign wealth funds and other asset owners for direct investment, said Mark Vecchio, partner and the co-chairman of the New York corporate group at law firm Venable LLP. “Definitely more public pension funds and sovereign wealth funds would more likely be involved,” said Mr. Vecchio, who works with asset owners, including Australian pension funds.
“There is now some enthusiasm because of the noise by the (presidential) campaigns on both sides about the importance of investment in infrastructure,” he added.
Whether the new president and Congress end up enhancing existing infrastructure programs or creating the national infrastructure bank that President Barack Obama has called for, any enhancement of infrastructure financing would entice more investment in U.S. infrastructure, Mr. Vecchio said.
Interesting....thanks.
At the time these things were starting to gain traction here in the U.S., I predicted that their financial performance would be disastrous.
There's a reason why so many of those deals were signed by foreign buyers. U.S. institutional investors were smart enough to steer clear of them.
Tom McClintock says to vote YES on 53 - Revenue Bonds are paid for by the users of the project AND ARE NOT PAID FOR FROM THE STATE’S GENERAL FUND.
So, the taxpayer is off the hook.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.