Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin to Go ‘Rogue’ for Trump in Michigan
Breitbart ^ | 4 Nov 2016 | JOEL B. POLLAK

Posted on 11/04/2016 3:36:38 PM PDT by Resettozero

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last
To: Resettozero
Michigan has a soft spot for Sarah, when McCain was writing us off she was willing to fight for us.
21 posted on 11/04/2016 7:15:16 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Bookmark


22 posted on 11/04/2016 10:23:17 PM PDT by publius911 (IMPEACH HIM NOW evil, stupid, insane ignorant or just clueless, doesn't matter!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: proud American in Canada

Sarah is the original Donald


23 posted on 11/04/2016 10:28:20 PM PDT by joshua c (Cut the cord! Don't pay for the rope they hang you with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred
She should probably just lay low at this point.

That's a ridiculous statement! Sarah palin has alway been our secret weapon and to think that she's not more popular now than ever is crazy.

Go SARAH GO!

24 posted on 11/05/2016 12:26:10 AM PDT by rodguy911 (Go Sarah go! America home of the free because of the brave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KC_Lion

My God she is gorgeous.


25 posted on 11/05/2016 12:46:03 AM PDT by hattend (Firearms and ammunition...the only growing industries under the Obama regime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: hattend

Indeed she is.

Michigan will welcome her.


26 posted on 11/05/2016 12:52:04 AM PDT by weston (SO HERE'S THE STORY: As far as I'm concerned, it's Christ or nothing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Sarah,
Please do not put on your ‘screechy’ voice, that really turns me off, like finger nails on a blackboard, and I am totally a Sarah supporter.


27 posted on 11/05/2016 2:23:37 AM PDT by duckman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: duckman
Please do not put on your ‘screechy’ voice, that really turns me off, like finger nails on a blackboard, and I am totally a Sarah supporter.

If she does anyway, will you cancel your vote for Trump? You know that Trump has been criticized for his speech mannerism also being a turn-off for some who are "totally" Trump supporters anyway.

You really think her "screechy" voice is why McCain was not elected President, for example?

Also, you do not have to listen to her anymore when she speaks, just as I do not have to listen to your rude voice or you mine.
28 posted on 11/05/2016 2:37:01 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Reading much to much into my comments. Have a blessed day. DM


29 posted on 11/05/2016 2:45:40 AM PDT by duckman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: duckman
Reading much to much into my comments. Have a blessed day.

It's true; I do take the actual words posters use in determining what they are trying to say.

Read your own post again and see if you cannot understand why a reader here might think you're yet another of the many posters who "totally support Sarah Palin but...".

I stand by my interpretation of your conflicted choice of wording.
30 posted on 11/05/2016 3:39:26 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

What is the connection between Michigan and Sarah? She is not from MI is she?


31 posted on 11/05/2016 5:57:54 AM PDT by FroggyTheGremlim (Hillary Clinton: the official candidate of the National Sleep Foundation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred; Resettozero

I like Sarah a lot but...

So starts every PDS post
32 posted on 11/05/2016 7:50:36 AM PDT by COBOL2Java ("He may be a sinner but she's the Devil" - a minister on the candidates)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster
No. Although she sounds like she is from the UP. :)

But we are pretty much written off once the primaries are over. Both parties just take it for granted that Detroit is Michigan and just automatically put us in the Democrat column even though we have had a Republican legislator and quite often a Republican Governor.

She was the first one in a long time who was willing to pay any attention to us with the idea that our vote is worth fighting for on a national level.

Detroit and Flint are not the powerhouses they used to be, the Secretary of State has done a great deal to prevent vote fraud.

Donald Trump thought that we were worth fighting for and there is a chance he will take Michigan.

But Sarah was the first.

33 posted on 11/05/2016 8:47:57 AM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Not a Romantic, not a hero worshiper and stop trying to tug my heartstrings. It tickles!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: eCSMaster

He oldest son played AAA Hockey and did the whole away team thing and stayed with a host family in Michigan. I forgot what the name of hosting a kid is, the hockey world has a name for it...


34 posted on 11/05/2016 8:50:53 AM PDT by taildragger (Do you hear the people singing? The Song of Angry Men!....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero

Have they pieced Todd back together. A hell of a thing.


35 posted on 11/05/2016 8:53:54 AM PDT by Stentor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phillyred
Bless Sarah for volunteering to work Michigan, a State with many Conservatives, as well as Leftist automatons. How would Sarah "screw this up." She will certainly look very good, and sound very patriotic, in any comparison with an even better known woman in politics. I mean, she is speaking for herself, not Donald Trump. How is he possibly damaged by having a very nice looking, very patriotic gal, working her heart out for him?

How Can Any American?

How can any American support one, running for President, who does not respect the stated purpose of the Constitution, she has repeatedly sworn to preserve? The Preamble to the Constitution states that purpose, very clearly:

We the people of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Our "posterity," of course, are our lineal descendants. A purpose that is 100% consistent with Donald Trump's call to put America First. It is 100% consistent with the Fifth Commandment, and traditional Western values, in general. Mrs. Clinton's call for open borders, and the failure to properly vet immigrants from lands with very different value systems, is 100% inconsistent with that Constitutional purpose.

How can any American refuse to vote for Donald Trump, who not only understands & accepts what the Constitution requires. He strenuously exposes Mrs. Clinton on issue after issue!

Trump is willing to risk a lifetime of success--his whole career & fortune--to take on a corrupt media, that tries in every unfair, intellectually dishonest, way to cover up Mrs. Clinton's crimes and repeated acts of betrayal, in order to stand for us, our Constitution and our clear interests, on a host of vital issues. Consider:

1. Trump supports and has been endorsed by the border guards. Mrs. Clinton has shown only disdain for those trying to keep America safe from a flood of unauthorized invaders.

2. Trump supports the rights of Americans to efficiently arm themselves, both for their own protection and for the protection of America! Mrs. Clinton has repeatedly sought means to disarm American families.

3. Trump has supported local Police in violent confrontations with neighborhood thugs; while Mrs. Clinton & Obama have allied themselves with virulently anti Police groups--some funded by George Soros--groups determined to deny their law abiding neighbors, the Police protection, necessary to make those neighborhoods safe.

4. Trump understands that making any neighborhood safe, is the key to increasing constructive activity in such neighborhood;--the key to people being able to start local businesses, with some hope of success; the key to better job opportunities, better credit ratings, etc. Mrs. Clinton has shown herself more intent on encouraging and supporting those Soros funded groups.

5. Donald Trump supports all forms of American energy production! He wants to let the coal miners get back to work; to take advantage of improved technology that allows a cleaner use of coal. Mrs. Clinton has insulted the coal miners, by refusing to help them get back to work, while she patronizes them; offering them a new dependence on even more Governmental meddling.

6. Returning to the Constitution--the solemn compact (or contract) that authorizes us to even have a Federal Government;--the charter, that once--when truly honored--made us the envy of the earth:

Donald Trump has pledged to appoint only those who honor the clear intent of that charter, to the Federal Judiciary. Mrs. Clinton has promised to only appoint Judges who agree with her ghoulish view of Feminist issues: such as the idea that it is O.K. for a woman--on mere whim--to have a healthy, already half born baby, killed in cold blood, in something euphemistically labeled a "partial birth abortion!"

7. Donald Trump, daily addresses great rallies, to discuss these and other vital issues; such as the damage to American workers & communities, resulting from trade deals, and immigration policies, that do not protect our rooted population. Mrs. Clinton has avoided in depth discussion of issues; preferring, instead, an incessant attack on Donald Trump's personality; his tone; his supporters;--in each case misrepresenting the same by a combination of lies, cherry picked but misleading data, gross exaggerations, and citations of spurious media smears, engineered by a slavish press, which covers up actual crimes, in a blind, but determined, support for the perpetrator.

Under such circumstances: How can any American vote for Mrs. Clinton? How can any American refuse to vote for Donald Trump?

Note further: There are thousands of organizations, some Faith based (both evangelical & social); some secular, but ideological; some based on Humanist arrogance (Return To Babel). Among them there is something to represent just about any imagined human interest. Our written Constitution is the sole organizational effort focused solely on the interests of the rooted American. How dare any American betray or trivialize our organization; the Constitutional Republic, as it was intended by the Fathers, who won it for their posterity?! How can any American refuse to vote for Donald Trump?

May the living God Bless all those who understand what is truly at stake!

One final note:

The Difference Between Virtue & Sanctimony

As we move into the last days of the 2016 Presidential campaign in America, there remain some, both moderates & conservatives, who feel a need to disparage Donald Trump over matters of personal taste, polish or social decorum, rather than on questions of public policy--rather than on actual issues over the proper functions & purpose of our Federal Government; rather than on issues, which go to the very survival of our traditional way of life.

It is not our purpose, here, to pass judgment of anyone's view of proper social decorum, or on anyone's personality, or methods of argumentation in political exchanges or discussion. Here we have dealt with priorities; with present as well as future perspectives on the valid priorities of the American people: With what matters in relation to future prospects, material & spiritual; to the continuity of America & the Americans; recognizing that the future happiness of hundreds of millions of Americans is on the line: In short what is fifty thousand fold more important than the incident in which Donald Trump responded a bit rudely to a pretty "debate" moderator's insulting questions, or made some gauche comments many years ago. In short, the difference between actual virtue and sanctimony.

William Flax

36 posted on 11/05/2016 8:56:33 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear

Have not been up in our Northern neighbor for some years, but, frankly, suspect that Donald Trump will take Michigan by a clear, if not overwhelming margin. We will see on Tuesday!


37 posted on 11/05/2016 8:59:53 AM PDT by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: taildragger
McCain can't stand Trump and she is doing what his Campaign should have did in 08'!

McCain lost Michigan by 17 points. You really think Palin would have made a difference?

38 posted on 11/05/2016 9:01:27 AM PDT by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero
Sarah Palin to the GOPe:

"Paybacks are a Bitch!"


39 posted on 11/05/2016 9:04:12 AM PDT by Bratch ("The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing." - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stentor
Have they pieced Todd back together. A hell of a thing.

Do believe they have but he's not on this trip with Sarah and her two youngest girls. Todd is probably home keeping tabs on Trig although he has been traveling with his wife to events in the past month or so.
40 posted on 11/05/2016 9:05:21 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-59 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson