Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Re: Time to get in the haz mat suits,
Wikileaks ^

Posted on 11/04/2016 6:41:56 AM PDT by detective

From: Jennifer Palmieri To: 'john.podesta@gmail.com' ; Neera Tanden

Sent: Fri Jun 10 19:11:53 2011 Subject: Time to get in the haz mat suits,

Bust in that house and get Huma the hell out of there.

(Excerpt) Read more at wikileaks.org ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: abedin; clinton; palmieri; podesta
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last
What was going on with Huma Abedin in "that house"?
1 posted on 11/04/2016 6:41:56 AM PDT by detective
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: detective

They wanted to get Mrs. Weiner away from Mr. Weiner.


2 posted on 11/04/2016 6:43:44 AM PDT by donozark (It is true after all. Hillary Clinton really IS the Fouke Monster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

They wanted to find that “Life Insurance” file and delete it.


3 posted on 11/04/2016 6:46:13 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

today’s the last day for something big to drop...thinking about GWB’s DWI, indictment of Casper Weinberger, etc.

Time we return the favor. One simple knock out punch.


4 posted on 11/04/2016 6:47:06 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: detective

Why in the world is Neera Tanden on this email, she is part of a PAC and should have no contact with anyone in that group.


5 posted on 11/04/2016 6:49:46 AM PDT by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

Team Clinton has “boundary issues”. :-)


6 posted on 11/04/2016 6:51:10 AM PDT by cgbg (Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude
today’s the last day for something big to drop...thinking about GWB’s DWI, indictment of Casper Weinberger, etc.

While I wouldn't rule out the possibility of one last Trump "scandal" being announced today, I think the parade of women accusers against Trump a few weeks ago was originally supposed to take place yesterday or today, leaving Trump with no time to respond. When all of the Wikileaks revelations started to appear and gain traction, the Clinton crime family decided they needed to play that card sooner than planned to divert the public's attention away from Wikileaks.

7 posted on 11/04/2016 6:57:54 AM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

I don’t expect raids or arrests until Wednesday. Surely the LEOs know Trump will win on Tuesday. So they’ll hold off until until Wednesday morning and avoid appearance of vote tampering. JMHO, of course.


8 posted on 11/04/2016 7:00:30 AM PDT by Tucker39 (Welcome to America! Now speak English; and keep to the right....In driving, in Faith, and politics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

The one major benefit of Early Voting is that the time to unleash the blockbuster revelation is pushed earlier in the cycle. If you wait until the last minute as in the past, millions of early votes have already happened.


9 posted on 11/04/2016 7:01:17 AM PDT by NonValueAdded (#DeplorableMe #BitterClinger #HillNO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: detective

FWIW, sounds to me more like a clean up than an intervention.


10 posted on 11/04/2016 7:01:55 AM PDT by mewzilla (I'll vote for the first guy who promises to mail in his SOTU addresses.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

“today’s the last day for something big to drop...thinking about GWB’s DWI, indictment of Casper Weinberger, etc.”

I think you’re right. If the MSM wants to take full advantage of their usual news cycle they have to drop it today - and, in fact, in the next few hours or they’ll miss the evening news programs. if we’re not waking up to it already (i.e. if it wasn’t released somewhere over night) then it doesn’t exist (that’s just my guess). I wonder if Wikileaks has any last minute surprises?


11 posted on 11/04/2016 7:04:50 AM PDT by vladimir998 (Apparently I'm still living in your head rent free. At least now it isn't empty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

And you expect the dems to follow the rules ?


12 posted on 11/04/2016 7:05:42 AM PDT by onona (Honey this isn't Kindergarten. We are in an all out war for the survival of our Country !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
There was a small news item earlier this week when Gloria Allred canceled a news conference out in California where one of Trump's alleged victims was supposed to be trotted out.

That was a big flag to me, suggesting that they may be shutting down some of these last-minute "bombshells" from the Clinton side.

13 posted on 11/04/2016 7:22:50 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

I suspect they know Trump wasn’t bluffing about suing them into oblivion.
Another reason why Trump was the only hope we had this election.


14 posted on 11/04/2016 7:26:49 AM PDT by Romans Nine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tucker39

I think that if I were in law enforcement.....

Where the job is to enforce/prosecute....

I would actually be inclined towards that. I think you are right.

Law enforcement doesn’t really win if clinton loses. The crimes are still there to prosecute. Same if she wins. Either way she has to be prosecuted. But if they announce something today, it looks like they are saying “here you are voters...now it’s up to YOU to do justice at the ballot box”.

That is sort of cowardly from a true law enforcement perspective. And you are entirely correct...if they announce something, whether she wins or loses (ESPECIALLY if she wins!) their “tampering” just makes their subsequent prosecution more difficult. Maybe even politically impossible.

So I think if I were part of the prosecution team, I’d say let’s lie low. We have our job to do. We will do it in an orderly fashion, and not be be swayed by a timeline of the election which really doesn’t have anything to do with the prosecution.

(And from a “human nature” perspective....don’t you just have to think that there are a few with ambition in there who would actually rather prosecute a President, not a former Secretary of State? The former you go down in history. The latter, not as much).

The downside of this is that the FBI has done, bravely, what it can do here. It fulfilled its duty to Congress, and arguably, by announcing, it did so without regards to the election timeline one way or the other.

Then, they will prosecute these apparently sickening crimes when they are ready.

But as for the election? Well, that has to be decided by the voters with the information available now.

So it seems to me, after reflecting on your post.


15 posted on 11/04/2016 7:29:48 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Romans Nine

Another reason why Trump was the only hope we had this election.”

NO Republican could withstand the democrat attack machine.

You are 10000% correct.


16 posted on 11/04/2016 7:30:50 AM PDT by ConservativeDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Romans Nine
Apparently he already sued a former Miss Universe contestant into oblivion. LOL.

It had nothing to do with allegations like the ones we've seen here, but involved an allegation she made that the Miss Universe contests are rigged.

17 posted on 11/04/2016 7:38:33 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Yo, bartender -- Jobu needs a refill!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Team Clinton finally figured out that the attacks on Trump:

(1)Were just further energizing Trump supporters because it showed how sleazy Clinton was

(2)Were depressing turnout among their supporters because it is liberals who are more likely to get mad at candidates who stoop to negative campaigning

(3)Was ticking off minority voters who had already bought into the earlier Clinton view that stuff that was "just about sex" was irrelevant--and was further evidence that Clinton didn't care about them and their real issues.
18 posted on 11/04/2016 7:38:38 AM PDT by cgbg (Another World War I veteran for Hillary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

Totally agree


19 posted on 11/04/2016 7:57:38 AM PDT by tinyowl (A equals A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

couldn’t agree more!


20 posted on 11/04/2016 8:57:35 AM PDT by village idiot (check out who donated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson