FBI Clinton Foundation probe finds 'avalanche' of corruption evidence against her - but agents fear

Daily Mail UK ^ | 11/03/2016 | Francesca Chambers

[sevinufnine]

An FBI investigation into the Clinton Foundation is likely to lead to an indictment unless the Justice Department interferes, two sources familiar with the probe told Fox News. The Clintons are accused of running a pay-for-play operation out of the State Department that favored donors to their charity - a charge they have denied. But the feds are 'actively and aggressively pursuing this case,' Fox's Brit Hume said Wednesday, and they have an 'avalanche' of evidence. A Wall Street Journal report says the FBI's pursuit of the case is rooted in recordings of a suspect in a different corruption case who spoke about the Clinton Foundation's alleged dirty dealings.

[sevinufnine]

Fox is now reporting that federal investigators have collected 'a lot of' evidence, including Wikileaks emails to and foundation officials. The probe into the foundation is much larger than has previously been reported, the network says. Some witnesses are being interviewed for a third time. It is a 'very high priority,' Fox's sources said.

An indictment is likely to be handed down in the case, unless investigators are obstructed by the DOJ's prosecutors.

[Buckeye McFrog]

unless investigators are obstructed by the DOJ's prosecutors.

until investigators are obstructed by the DOJ's prosecutors.

There. Fixed it.

[Starboard]

The DOJ is 90% certain that they won’t.

[Senator Goldwater]

She’s been 100% indicted in the court of public opinion.

[LouAvul]

FBI=CLD. Never happen.

[pepsionice]

This will happen in January. I think that the FBI will hand this over, and the Trump DOJ will agree to appoint a independent prosecutor.

What might be interesting is just how many people end up on this list? It won’t be just Hillary.

[Mr. Douglas]

When I see a headline that reads, “Hillary indicted”, I will see this as something other than news churn.

[rightwingintelligentsia]

But whom would they indict? The Clintons, or some low-level staffer?

[sevinufnine]

“She’s been 100% indicted in the court of public opinion.”

Actually, she’s been 100% indicted in the court of public opinion...of those with at least 2 functioning brain cells (and a conscience).

[Ouchthatonehurt]

Well there is a vast FBI conspiracy after all.
Sarc.

[FlingWingFlyer]

The first “historical” U.S. President to be perp walked out of the Oval Office. If the FBI doesn’t do it, the American people will.

[Steely Tom]

When I see a headline that reads, “Hillary indicted”, I will see this as something other than news churn.

Fair enough, but this is coming from the UK Daily Mail, not some blog no one's ever heard of.

[sevinufnine]

“But whom would they indict? The Clintons, or some low-level staffer?”

Oh my friend, you DO know whichever of their staffers was indicted, regardless of their actual lever would immediately become a “low-level” staffer.

[Helicondelta]

At this point, if the FBI doesn’t destroy Hillary, she will destroy them. If Loretta tries to block, they will leak. Hillary is toast.

[Old Retired Army Guy]

“Unless prevented by DOJ”???? I think that is a certainty.

[Don Corleone]

Does anyone actually know who thought up the “Clinton Foundation” scheme in the first place? I don’t think that either Billary or Hillary have the financial acumen to dream it up, only the amorality to have operated it.

[bigbob]

None of us will be able to afford popcorn by the time this is over!

[sport]

When?

[Blood of Tyrants]

Hopefully this will become so hot the DOJ will be afraid to interfere with it.

[my small voice]

Bingo