Whoever controls the GEMS software, can set the vote to whatever outcome they want. They can specify the percentages they want the final outcome to be.
FRACTION MAGIC VIDEO (Rigging Voting Machines)
10/31/2016 4:56:47 PM PDT · by Mozilla · 10 replies
Black Box Voting ^ | 10/31/16 | Bev Harris
http://www.infowars.com/how-americas-elections-are-hacked/
I caught part of the radio show and this is the biggest fraud if true. If this is true the Democratic party should be decertified and outlawed.
So where’s the states’ attorneys general??
BTTT
.
There is no reason in the world that any vote counting software should NEED to use floating point math with 14 places to the right of the decimal point and not integer math. Votes are a unitary, quantum, one size fits all. There is no such thing as a fractional vote. There can only be an integer vote of one vote to a person. No vote is worth more or less than ONE. . . yet the GEMS software is capable of handling votes valued to 14 decimal place values. WHY?
The reason is that by placing values on votes you can easily steal an election and set any percentage outcome for any side the operator of the GEMS software desires as an outcome! AND, unless there is tedious audit trail to follow from a paper original ballot that is kept which often does not even exist, it is an invisible hack and cannot be proved that the election was hacked, because the software takes care of adjusting every thing at every level down to the precinct to make it all look correct!
Bet Harris is a Liberal Democrat and she is convinced that Hillary Clinton is going to steal the election, quote: "If Hillary wins or loses the election, she's going to win the election," due to this GEMS imbedded software which has been spread to almost every state. Harris is horrified!
This fractional vote tallying software, according to Bennie Smith, the IT guy discoverer of the hidden code, is dated as being present in versions of GEMS as early as 2006. I leave it to all of you to make your own conclusions as to who stole what elections using this capabilities since it was placed inside GEMS since 2006.
I cannot think of a single legitimate reason for this capability to be found in a voting machine.
Very Important issue.
Duplicate of yesterday’s threads on this.
The following link has a great deal of deal on University research on this matter, AG decertifying the top three voting machine vendor’s systems, and issues with Bev Harris.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3487281/posts
The vulnerabilities are legitimate concerns.
However, if you watch the 25 min video, you’ll clearly see it is directed to stir up doubts in the black community about voting integrity.
Bev Harris was on a mission making the case that John Kerry should have won the 2004 election and that Bush & republicans stole it from the dems.
Bev Harris is kind of a Cindy Sheenan character IMHO.
EVERY individual who has the ability to do this programming or any other method of changing outcomes should have to be licensed. A week before any election they should ALL be subjected to a polygraph with the key questions relating to any such changes. Have you ever...did you...were you told to...
Failure to be truthful should warrant revocation of license and prosecution.