Posting this for informational purposes only and do not in any way endorse the veracity of this Slate article. In fact, I regard it with great suspicion and post it here only to help my fellow Freepers stay informed.
The Democrat Candidate shared a link to this article on Facebook this evening.
1 posted on
10/31/2016 7:37:54 PM PDT by
jonatron
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
To: jonatron
Hillary is tweeting this nonsense. It reads like a Coast to Coast show. Incredibly long and way at the end you find it’s not true, NYT disproved it, they admit there are other explanations. It’s all data conspiracy craziness.
2 posted on
10/31/2016 7:41:15 PM PDT by
Williams
(The (republican) party is over.)
To: jonatron
4 posted on
10/31/2016 7:42:27 PM PDT by
dynoman
(Objectivity is the essence of intelligence. - Marilyn vos Savant)
To: jonatron
I love the left’s tactic of asking a question, e.g. “Is Trump a serial groper?”; “Will the GOP rebound after Trump?” “Will Trump’s temper lead us to war?”
The article here is example #7,589, (just this week!).
5 posted on
10/31/2016 7:43:37 PM PDT by
oldplayer
To: jonatron
From the end of the article- “What the scientists amassed wasnt a smoking gun. Its a suggestive body of evidence that doesnt absolutely preclude alternative explanations.” It’s nonsense and Hillary relied on it like a kook.
6 posted on
10/31/2016 7:44:17 PM PDT by
Williams
(The (republican) party is over.)
To: jonatron
Oh, Fer Pete’s Sake. Give. It. Up.
Hillary is TOAST...and should have already been arrested last July. Huma is going to SING like a canary to save her sorry Muslim @ss because the Devil She Knew WILL throw her under the bus!
Best. Election. Ever. EVER!
7 posted on
10/31/2016 7:45:19 PM PDT by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set!)
To: jonatron
Slate.
Okay, it’s got to be gospel.
LOL. I crack me up.
5.56mm
8 posted on
10/31/2016 7:45:21 PM PDT by
M Kehoe
To: jonatron
9 posted on
10/31/2016 7:45:56 PM PDT by
John Robinson
(I am a twit @_John_Robinson)
To: jonatron
What the scientists amassed wasnt a smoking gun. Its a suggestive body of evidence that doesnt absolutely preclude alternative explanations. Translation: we got nothing so we'll make some stuff up and hope it sticks.
To: jonatron
What the scientists amassed wasnt a smoking gun. Its a suggestive body of evidence that doesnt absolutely preclude alternative explanations. If I'd written this crap I'd shoot myself.
To: jonatron
Mike Cernovich 🇺🇸 @Cernovich 2m2 minutes ago
Slate's "Russian server story" is so bad that Daily Beast (owned by Chelsea Clinton) passed on it and Carlos Slims' blog (NYT) debunked it.
13 posted on
10/31/2016 7:49:34 PM PDT by
Miss Didi
("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
To: jonatron
It’s “intelligent” enough for a Hillary supporter!
I’m just an IT dilletante and it seemed like a case of looking too hard for something.
14 posted on
10/31/2016 7:49:42 PM PDT by
mrsmith
(Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
To: jonatron
This is BS and doesn’t belong here. Now is not the time to give crap stories like this a single hit.
15 posted on
10/31/2016 7:49:44 PM PDT by
DesertRhino
(November 8, America's Brexit!!!)
To: jonatron
The stench of Progressive bull crap is in the air.
17 posted on
10/31/2016 7:50:38 PM PDT by
House Atreides
(Send BOTH Hillary & Bill to prison.)
To: jonatron
‘Hello, I am, Natasha in Sverdlovsk...’
To: jonatron
Wow, they’re grasping for straws.
25 posted on
10/31/2016 8:06:51 PM PDT by
ealgeone
To: jonatron
.
This is total crap.
Doesn’t belong on this site.
26 posted on
10/31/2016 8:08:19 PM PDT by
editor-surveyor
(Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
To: jonatron
27 posted on
10/31/2016 8:09:33 PM PDT by
Mariner
(War Criminal #18)
To: jonatron
Who could ever endorse the validity of ANY Slate article ??? The leftwing media (rather an unnecessary descriptor) is so desperate.
29 posted on
10/31/2016 8:11:07 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: jonatron
We dont yet know what this server was forActually your friends over at reddit.com/r/The_Donald have figured this out. It was for marketing hotel services by a company Trump hired to market hotel services. The people who registered the website are in the business of marketing hotel services, it turns out.
To: jonatron
32 posted on
10/31/2016 8:13:13 PM PDT by
CodeToad
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson