Posted on 10/31/2016 9:22:16 AM PDT by OddLane
This is a remarkable speech-and I haven't even listened to 20 minutes of it. I don't know why this man isn't Trump's chief spokesman.
“No he is not liberal.”
He’s a fag homo. That’s not a lib? You ain’t a conservative if you are.
For better or worse, a heck of lot of your conservative heroes were quietly (or not so quietly, in eras where the press kept politicians’ secrets) homosexual.
So you’re telling me Reagan was a homo? I knew FR was infiltrated by fag lovers. Disgusting.
That is so great. Thanks.
Please note my context! I’m not meaning to put Thiel down! What I meant was simply that both parties always highlight a “crossbencher” (British term, having nothing to do with sexuality) at their convention. Thiel was Trump’s.
Some fault is mine. I was wondering, “who the Hell said anything about the Koch brothers.” ED Koch. (Sounds like Kotch! Remember him?) SCOOP Jackson!
Granted. My point was that if you look at Tjiel he is no token. He is a conservative
I was about to post this too. It’s an amazing speech that would probably even give a lot of prospective Hillary-voters second thoughts. But more than that it is a thoughtful overview of where we are as a country.
He’s an ally against the Leftards. I’ll take an Ally anyday of the week.
Such nastiness is completely uncalled for.
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
What exactly was so nasty? Depends on one’s point of view, doesn’t it? Politically correct speech is mandatory according to some folks, but others are not inclined to follow the rules.
BTTT!
Trying to water down libertarianism for public consumption-while at the same time trying to take over the GOP and cement open borders dogmatism as its outlook-shouldn't be applauded.
Just because cosmotarian bozos and natural rights libertarians/an-caps both distrust the Koches doesn't mean they're on the right track.
This is the same flawed logic that says if the left and the right hate a policy that means it's good.
No, sometimes your ideas are just so terrible that everyone recognizes it.
Pretty sure Thiel would self-identify as a libertarian, small l, rather than conservative.
I was referring to Ed Koch, the liberal who endorsed George Bush, not the Koch brothers.
It was intended to be a string of insults and it was.
No need for that and counterproductive for our efforts here.
“No he is not liberal.”
He’s a fag homo. That’s not a lib? You ain’t a conservative if you are.
______________________________________
He is not a liberal...He is a fiscal conservative and libertarian—A fiscal conservative is for small government, less government, less spending...Social values and mores don’t factor in...perhaps you should educate yourself...
http://www.conservapedia.com/Fiscal_conservatism
Oh and thanks so much for honoring the requests of several on this thread to clean up your language and keeping it smart and classy for yourself and Free Republic.
Ever hear the expression: Love the sinner, hate the sin?
IF not, perhaps you should educate yourself: https://gracethrufaith.com/ask-a-bible-teacher/hate-the-sin-love-the-sinner/
I would argue with your first statement here, but I agree with the concerns expressed in your second statement. No need to alienate anyone who supports our objective of getting Trump elected.
“He is a fiscal conservative and libertarian”
fiscal conservative is code word for “moderate” which is the same idiotic term for “liberal” conservatives. Ergo, it’s an excuse to accept this faggot as conservative. Maybe next year, we’ll accept a conservative who molest kids judging by the goal line being moved in this so-called “conservative” forum.
Max, your hyperbole about the forum is nonsense.
You may consider yourself a true conservative, but your comments about the forum and fiscal conservatives don’t show you in best light. Hate the sin, Love the sinner...oh that is not for judgemental Christians like some...I let God do the judging—between them and God what they do...
I don’t use course language around my children, and I and others certainly don’t appreciate your continued use of it here, especially after you were asked repeatedly by me as well as others to stop...
Frankly, you are not being considerate of anyone here—nor are you accomplishing anything like educating yourself or others...You are just being antagonistic—deliberately— and that reflects back on your character.
“You may consider yourself a true conservative”
I’m not conservative. I’m rightwing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.