Posted on 10/30/2016 10:35:22 AM PDT by Behind Liberal Lines
In an opening statement on her show "Justice with Judge Jeanine," Pirro said the announcement Friday by FBI Director James Comey that the bureau will review newly found emails in connection with Clinton's private email server "disgraces and politicizes the FBI and is symptomatic of all that is wrong in Washington."
NO she Did not !!!!
You all need to calm down and quit spouting off if you didn’t watch Pirro’s show last night. It was awesome. Take a Politico story and flush it before you get pissy and mouth off - especially about someone who is clearly a Trump supporter.
-
Hillary got every break known to man.
They kept finding more illegality, but simply said, she wouldn’t do this. Not Hillary!
How about Sandy Berger?
Why was Susan Rice promoted?
Good source on radio says the NYPD played it so the FBI had no choice.
‘
Did you watch her show? I doubt it. It was a good one....
Politico warping what was said by the judge for their own propaganda purposes.
No way, no how would either of these judges give the democrats cover. Pure misinformation.
I’m sorry you seem so determined to push Politico’s dirty lies.
That’s what I am thinking. She is criticizing the FBI leadership in TOTAL, not just for the latest Weiner related actions.
Before this was posted, did someone listen to her entire recording or was the Politico story just posted and believed? Can you please compare the two entities’ integrity?
Smearing Pirro in favor of Politico isn’t cool.
I really don’t watch TV barely at all.
Sounds like she is making controversy to up ratings.
She has been a law and order judge, so this makes no sense otherwise.
It’s not the same. At all.
I watched her show last night and this headline is horsesh1t.
She is a stalwart defender of Trump and argued forcefully that Clinton should have be in jail, and would be if the original FBI investigation had not been a sham, and if the DOJ had done its job.
Is true that she spent a tiny fraction of her show disapproving of an FBI director publicly (re)opening an investigation on a presidential candidate 11 days before an election.
She made a strong case, and anyone honestly interested in what that case was, should watch the show before drawing false conclusions about whose side she’s on.
FReepers ought to appreciate commentators who speak the truth without regard to political consequences - isn’t that what we love about Trump?
I’m quite sure that nobody making negative comments about Pirro watched the show, certainly not in its entirety.
Is it your position that "Breitbart" is simply parroting Politico?
I fully understand that Poltico is a left wing smear machine, like 90% of the rest of the media. And this precisely why "the Judge" was incredibly stupid to have given them something to spin.
Holding you head in the sand and pretending she didn't play into the Clinton camp's hands on this one by parroting their main talking point--even while attacking Clinton otherwise--is not going to stop the spin.
Judge J, the real “politicization” of the FBI took place in July with the original decision not to prosecute Hillary.
Nation is at the precipice but have just enough time to swing ourself over the cliff to safety. :)
Judge J, the real “politicization” of the FBI took place in July with the original decision not to prosecute Hillary.
Nation is at the precipice but have just enough time to swing ourself over the cliff to safety. :)
Sounds like she is auditioning hard to replace Megyn.
==
Wow, she was the lone holdout on my list at Faux Noose. Now I have no one to watch on that crooked network. So she can take Kelly’s show and she will tank too.
Look who’s talking about the need to calm down. LMAO
You calm down.
If you have something to report, report it dodo bird.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.