pure conjecture, the opposite can be said just as easily
Comey will be strung up by his heels a la Il Duce if he does this - by both parties and both campaigns. He better have something because nobody will be amused if it turns out to be another “nothing to see here, folks” move.
No need for another fix. This is just a huge RED HERRING to get the attention in the media away from Hillary-Obama-DOJ-FBI conspiracy and crimes that WIKILEAKS has already exposed.
Nothing new - right out of the DemocRAT handbook.
Besides, there already is "significant" evidence available to impartially indict her. Comey can't be trusted.
“In short, watch out: the fix may be in. “
Wow, haven’t heard that cliche before. Oooooooooooooh let me “watch out”!
Who cares?! That isnt the point right now.
The point is to use this to help win the election. Worry about the outcome later.
Not this time. You are F’d this time Conyers. We are coming after your sorry hide too.
I think considerable damage has already been done. Even the MSM know there is a smoking gun. If this is a rope-a-dope strategy I don’t think it will work this time.
It has to do with the Clinton Foundation. Huma was an employee at the same time of Teneo, the CF, and the State Department. Her emails would reflect the pay for play aspect of the CF. Also, the 12 page Doug Band memo released by Wikileaks is the smoking gun. The CF is a giant slush fund and money making machine for the Clintons. Of course there is criminality there.
They didn’t exonerate her the first time. Comey just said that he didn’t think that a prosecutor would prosecute HER.
What fix? This was not the week for this to come out. It is no doubt going to reduce the votes she receives. I expect Trump to win and then have her indicted.
Nonsense. No LEO would ever announce a major investigation and wrap it up in five business days. They would be laughed out of the profession. There will be no indictment or exoneration before the election. Just many many many questions.
Here’s the thing... in that press conference in July, Comey laid out the case for indicting Clinton. BUT he said that there was no clear intent. If now his minions have shown him emails previously not disclosed which show clear intent he’s in a box, he has no choice but to move forward. In fact, he should have said, I am recommending that she be indicted or I’m recommending that there be a grand jury convened. I don’t know whether he has the authority to indict or convene a grand jury. I don’t think he can. Basically he’s just a cop.
Oh, this is just Conyers not having gone through his stages of grief yet.
Comey would be the biggest fool in all of history to do this without having her dead to rights.
Scenario: President-elect Trump threatens Obama with 2-4 years of litigation if Obama pardons ANYONE without Rudy’s approval. Next the goofy looking congressman from S.C. RESIGNS from his seat to become the special prosecutor. Will O stand up for his lieutenants? Think of the guards at the Berlin wall who shot at escapees. In 89’ somebody went looking for them. Karma’s a bitch.
Now, there's a guy who you can count on to tell the truth.
There is no way they would have reopened the case unless there was vital info that will reverse their decision. If what they have is weak, they would have stated that there is not sufficient evidence to reopen this case.
Much like a convicted felon. They will not reopen that case UNLESS there is clear evidence of innocence.
This works both ways.
Did anyone expect a lapdog to say anything else?