Posted on 10/27/2016 5:43:36 PM PDT by governsleastgovernsbest
Message to Ron Reagan: when it comes to this barbaric procedure, it’s not about the nomenclature . . . On this evening’s Hardball, Ron Reagan claimed that “there’s no such thing as partial-birth abortion. Doesn’t exist.” Reagan criticized third-debate moderator Chris Wallace for having used the term.
Would Reagan’s exquisite sensitivities be assuaged if Wallace had used the technical term: intact dilation and extraction? The bottom line is the same: Hillary Clinton supports it and Donald Trump opposes it.
View the video here.
(Excerpt) Read more at legalinsurrection.com ...
Ronald Pooftah Reagan
I agree with Joe Sobran. When it comes to abortion, we should put aside emotion-laden terms and phrases, and use coldly accurate, precise scientific terms.
Thus, we should stop using the manipulative, emotion-laden term “Partial-Birth Abortion,” and use the precise, scientific term, “Birth Canal Brain-Suctioning.”
>> we should put aside emotion-laden terms and phrases
Legal killing.
A woman’s sense of liberty must not be defined by having the right to kill.
Regardless how abortion is described, it remains that the states have never amended the Constitution to give the corrupt feds the specific power to regulate, tax and spend for abortion of any kind.
So why are the feds in the abortion business?
It all began when pro-abortion, activist justices ignored 10th Amendment-protected state soverignty and decided Roe v. Wade against the states, wrongly legislating from the bench the fictitious constitutional right to have an abortion. Not only did justices use stolen state powers to establish that phony right, but consider the following.
Corrupt federal lawmakers then followed in the footsteps of activist justices by explointing women with those same stolen state powers in the following way. Lawmakers took advantange of the 19th Amendment, in conjuction with the ill-conceived 17th Amendment, winning votes from women with the campaign promise of federal funding for abortion, such women evidently not understanding that the states have never given the feds the express constitutional authority to tax and spend for abortion purposes.
Using broad language, a previous generation of state sovereignty-respecting justices had clarified Congress's limited power to regulate, tax and spend as evidened by the following excerpts.
“Congress is not empowered to tax for those purposes which are within the exclusive province of the States.” —Justice John Marshall, Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
In fact, considering that one of the few powers that the states have constitutioonally delegated to the feds to regulate an aspect of domestic policy is to run the US Mali Service (1.8.7), one the few things that women actually gained with respect to having a voice in domestic policy after the 19th Amendment was ratified was a voice in deciding how the Mail Service is run.
Remember in November !
Patriots need to support Trump / Pence by also electing a new, state sovereignty-respecting Congress that will not only work within its constitutional Article I, Section 8-limited powers to support Trump’s vision for making America great again for everybody, but will also put a stop to unconstitutonal federal taxes and likewise unconstitutional inteference in state affairs as evidenced by abortion.
Note that such a Congress will also probably be willing to fire state pro-abortion, activist justices.
Light in the loafers = mental light-weightedness.
Well, I did not know he was still on the MSNBC grift train as a ‘contributor’ ... but it is still so cheesy that he hasn’t been on in a month at least or much longer, as I did not know that his beard had passed ... regretful ...
You are nothing like your father. You, and so many other Americans, are sadly so ignorant. There are - Congressional hearing in the 90’s - Drs. *I use that term loosely*, Haskell and McMahon claimed they personally performed these 3 trimester D & X - pure evil. Doe vs. Bolton people - spread the word to the ignorant.
Doctors, real doctors, state emphatically that this “procedure” D & X, would not be used for the life of the mother cases. Another lie from these devils.
Doe vs Bolton allows this through all nine months of pregnancy.
This can be part of the description of so many federal programs.
That can’t be true.
You exist...
Thank you for emphasizing that.
Babycide
What?
Okay posting without reading the article. Sorry.
His father would be mortified.
And now I will go read the article. LOL!
Exactly. It is infanticide.
Loved the comment, Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
Thanks for the ping, glgb
Ron Reagan is an expert on abortion? - who knew?....
Hard to believe that useless piece of navel lint came from the loins of Ronaldus Magnus.
He’s right! Its called murder.
Newspeak. Rename things for political expediency, don’t call a thing what it is if it makes you feel uncomfortable.
Gay (faggot), reproductive rights (killing unborn babies), politically correct (weak and afraid of disagreements), diverse/inclusive/multicultural (screw white people), safe zone (whites have to shut up), democracy (republic).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.