Skip to comments.
Failure to find a sexual partner is now a DISABILITY says World Health Organisation
Express (UK) ^
Posted on 10/26/2016 5:44:43 PM PDT by TigerClaws
Until now, infertility - the failure to achieve pregnancy after 12 months or more of regular unprotected sex - was not considered a disability.
But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children - will now be equally classified as disabled.
WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.
(Excerpt) Read more at express.co.uk ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: Rebelbase
I remember a dystopia after a method was devised to let people select the sex of their child 100% and most picked boys. The story featured a girl who was about to be old enough to be sent off for her several years in a brothel as public service.
21
posted on
10/26/2016 6:04:35 PM PDT
by
tbw2
To: TigerClaws
22
posted on
10/26/2016 6:04:55 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either satire or opinion. Or both.)
To: TigerClaws
ok so when do we get our free weekly cialis and free weekly escort allowances? :-)
23
posted on
10/26/2016 6:05:02 PM PDT
by
SteveH
To: Republican Wildcat
This is a threat to feminism. Can the man demand that his wife make a baby even if she doesn’t want to? Or does this only mean the wife can use a sperm donor if her husband doesn’t want children while still keeping him on the hook for child support?
24
posted on
10/26/2016 6:07:19 PM PDT
by
tbw2
To: ctdonath2
Government arranged marriages without regard to race or age ... this becomes like “One Perfect Day”, where they intentionally merged the population to eliminate racial differences.
25
posted on
10/26/2016 6:08:20 PM PDT
by
tbw2
To: SteveH
free weekly cialis and free weekly escort allowances? Now that's a can-do attitude!
Take up to four hours and make your disability HER disability...lol.
To: TigerClaws
Ever get the feeling the UN has outlived its usefulness?
27
posted on
10/26/2016 6:15:11 PM PDT
by
OldNewYork
(Operation Wetback II, now with computers)
To: TigerClaws
You are DISABLE if you don't have a sex partner? How about kids...are they disable if they can't find a partner at 5 or 8 or 13? (ConservaTeen might think he is disabled since his partner is )
Is a Muslim without a camel disabled?
Can you get Social Security for this disability?
28
posted on
10/26/2016 6:17:35 PM PDT
by
Deplorable American1776
(Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is DEPLORABLE :-))
To: skr
hopefully so, i will receive a FORTUNE! HA HA maybe i will buy one of Mr Trump’s nice hotels then
29
posted on
10/26/2016 6:18:39 PM PDT
by
faithhopecharity
("Politicians are not born. They're excreted." Marcus Tullius Cicero.)
To: TigerClaws
So that Syrian refugee that raped the 10 year old boy in the swimming pool and claimed “sexual emergency” in his defense was really just a “handicapped” man desperately seeking assistance.
Sheesh. And the United Nations wonders why so many people have nothing but contempt for the organization.
30
posted on
10/26/2016 6:36:55 PM PDT
by
Captain Rhino
(Determined effort today forges tomorrow.)
To: TigerClaws
... and yet liberalism gets a pass still ?
31
posted on
10/26/2016 6:41:03 PM PDT
by
Celerity
To: TigerClaws; fieldmarshaldj
But now in dramatic move the World Health Organisation will change the standard to suggest that a person who is unable to find a suitable sexual partner or is lacking a sexual relationship to have children - will now be equally classified as disabled. WHO says the change will give every individual “the right to reproduce”.
:o
32
posted on
10/26/2016 6:44:10 PM PDT
by
Impy
(Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
To: Clintonfatigued; GOPsterinMA; NFHale; stephenjohnbanker
33
posted on
10/26/2016 6:44:46 PM PDT
by
Impy
(Never Shillery, Never Schumer, Never Pelosi)
To: billorites
Eeeewwww! That’s just wrong. Funny but still wrong.
34
posted on
10/26/2016 6:51:33 PM PDT
by
Roger Kaputnik
(Just because I'm paranoid doesn't prove that they aren't out to get me.)
To: TigerClaws
Just think of all the high school kids that can sign up for this.
35
posted on
10/26/2016 7:39:32 PM PDT
by
fella
("As it was before Noah so shall it be again,")
To: TigerClaws
I just felt SOMETHING was missing, somehow...
36
posted on
10/26/2016 7:45:48 PM PDT
by
gaijin
To: tbw2
Don’t forget Soros is running things now, and he’s a nazi. The nazis’ breeding program was blond and blue-eyed only.
37
posted on
10/26/2016 8:13:02 PM PDT
by
ryderann
To: billorites
Soon a sexual partner will become an entitlement to be provided by government.Next, they will assign sexual partners. Then, they will assign only GLBTQ sexual partners — to the unwilling.
38
posted on
10/26/2016 8:48:57 PM PDT
by
Albion Wilde
(We will be one People, under one God, saluting one American flag. --Donald Trump (standing ovation)
To: billorites
Soon a sexual partner will become an entitlement to be provided by government.Would anyone really want what the government would supply them with? ("Don't worry, citizen! We're gonna hook you up!") That's a recipe for disaster.
39
posted on
10/26/2016 10:04:56 PM PDT
by
BradyLS
(DO NOT FEED THE BEARS!)
To: rovenstinez
40
posted on
10/26/2016 10:07:07 PM PDT
by
deadrock
(I is someone else.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson